Close
  Indian J Med Microbiol
 

Figure 4: Line chart sho wing the results of the similarity analysis. The similarity indexes of the 10 samples were all above 0.820. The similarity indexes of samples with a "big" diameter were all above or equal to 0.898, while the indexes of samples with a "small" diameter were all less than 0.898 but above 0.820

Figure 4: Line chart sho wing the results of the similarity analysis. The similarity indexes of the 10 samples were all above 0.820. The similarity indexes of samples with a