Pharmacognosy Magazine

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2019  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 64  |  Page : 288--297

Caesalpinia pulcherrima arrests cell cycle and triggers reactive oxygen species-induced mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis and necroptosis via modulating estrogen and estrogen receptors


Nikhil S Sakle1, Deepak Lokwani2, Santosh Namdeo Mokale1,  
1 Department of Pharmacology, Dr. Rafiq Zakaria Campus, Y. B. Chavan College of Pharmacy, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Medicinal Chemistry, R. C. Patel Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Shirpur, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
Santosh Namdeo Mokale
Dr. Rafiq Zakaria Campus, Y. B. Chavan College of Pharmacy, Aurangabad - 431 001, Maharashtra
India

Abstract

Background: Caesalpinia pulcherrima belonging to the family Fabaceae is used in India as a traditional medicine for a variety of ailments. Globally, traditional medicines are presently being used for the treatment of cancer. Objective: The present study was aimed at investigating the chemomodulatory potential of C. pulcherrima flowers in breast cancer and explaining its possible mechanism. Materials and Methods: The cytotoxic potential of ethyl acetate fraction of C. pulcherrima (EAFCP) flower was tested in MCF-12A (normal breast), MCF-7 (estrogen receptor [ER] positive), and MDA-MB-453 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive) human breast cancer cells by sulforhodamine B assay. Chemomodulatory potential was evaluated in vivo against N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU)-induced mammary carcinoma in female Sprague Dawley® rats. The mechanism for anticancer potential was screened by in vitro studies involving Annexin V-FITC assay (apoptosis), cell cycle patterns, intracellular reactive oxygen species, and mitochondrial membrane potential measurement (FACS based) followed by docking study on estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-α). Results: The fractions showed perceptible cell growth inhibition potency (IC50<50 μg/ml) in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. In MNU-treated animals, antioxidant enzymes and histological examination showed statistically significant (P < 0.001) changes. Treatment of MCF-7 cells with EAFCP reduced cell growth rate by a mechanism associated with both apoptotic and necrotic cell death. Molecular docking study further showed that rutin and catechin have a comparable binding affinity for the ER-α. Conclusion: In this study, we confirmed that EAFCP was most effective in reducing cell viability, scavenging physiological oxidant species, and causing mitochondria-mediated apoptosis and necroptosis in MCF-7 cell by selectively modulating the functions of ER-α.



How to cite this article:
Sakle NS, Lokwani D, Mokale SN. Caesalpinia pulcherrima arrests cell cycle and triggers reactive oxygen species-induced mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis and necroptosis via modulating estrogen and estrogen receptors.Phcog Mag 2019;15:288-297


How to cite this URL:
Sakle NS, Lokwani D, Mokale SN. Caesalpinia pulcherrima arrests cell cycle and triggers reactive oxygen species-induced mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis and necroptosis via modulating estrogen and estrogen receptors. Phcog Mag [serial online] 2019 [cited 2021 Apr 11 ];15:288-297
Available from: http://www.phcog.com/text.asp?2019/15/64/288/265012


Full Text



SUMMARY

Ethyl acetate fraction of Caesalpinia pulcherrima (EAFCP) flower showed cytotoxic potential against breast cancer cells by sulforhodamine B assay. The anticancer and antioxidant potential of EAFCP flower was evaluated against N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced mammary cancer in female Sprague Dawley rats. The in vitro results of the present study showed that EAFCP can induce mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis and necroptosis through reactive oxygen species generation with loss of mitochondrial membrane potential in MCF-7 via modulating the functions of estrogen receptor-alpha in silico.

[INLINE:1]

Abbreviations used: EAFCP: Ethyl acetate fraction of Caesalpinia pulcherrima; MNU: N-methyl-N-nitrosourea; ROS: Reactive oxygen species; ER-α: Estrogen receptor-α; HPLC: High-performance liquid chromatography; TBARS: Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances; HP: Hydroperoxides; LPO: Lipid peroxidation; CAT: Catalase; SOD: Superoxide dismutase; NBT: p-nitro blue tetrazolium chloride; GPX: Glutathione peroxidase; GST: Glutathione-S-transferase; CDNB: 1-Chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene; GR: Glutathione reductase; GSH: Reduced glutathione; MMP: Mitochondrial membrane potential; H and E: Hematoxylin and eosin; TB: Toluidine blue; LBD: Ligand-binding domain; TAM: Tamoxifen; ADR: Adriamycin; ANOVA: Analysis of variance.

 Introduction



Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies in the world and a major cause of cancer-related deaths in women. It has been observed that estrogen level is an important factor in the initiation and development of breast cancer. Estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-α) is a well-characterized mediator in breast cancer for the proliferation of cells.[1] On the other hand, estrogens and estrogenic compounds are a subject of considerable fear in humans and animals during critical periods of development.[2] According to the WHO, medicinal herbs have played an important role in the treatment of cancer and would be the best source to obtain a variety of anticancer drugs.[3] Phytochemicals are an alternative medicine for chemoprevention in humans. These phytochemicals have multiple mechanisms for the prevention of cancer progression.[4] The administration of chemical carcinogen triggers the oxidative stress and elevates the levels of oxygen free radicals, which directly plays a key role in the development of carcinogenesis.[5]

Caesalpinia pulcherrima is commonly known as peacock flower or “Barbados pride” and belongs to the family Fabaceae. The aerial parts of this species have been used in traditional medicine for the treatment of various diseases such as asthma, bronchitis, cholera, diarrhea, dysentery, and malaria. The plant is known to possess antiviral, purgative, emmenagogue, tonic, stimulant, and cathartic activities and can be used for treating pyrexia, menoxenia, wheezing, and bronchitis.[6] The presence of ellagic acid, gallic acid, quercetin, rutin lupeol, β-Sitosterol, myricetin, flavonoids, and homoflavonoids, such as (E)-7-methoxy-3-(4'-methoxybenzylidene) chroman-4-one, (E)-7-hydroxy-3-(3',4',5'-trimethoxybenzylidene) chroman-4-one, isobonducellin, bonducellin and (E)-7-hydroxy-3-(2',4'-dimethoxybenzylidene) chroman-4-one, 3-(4'-hydroxy-benzyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-6,8-dimethyl-chroman-4-one, hyperforin, and platycodigenin in its flowers are reported.[7],[8]

Chemical carcinogen-induced rat mammary carcinoma model is a prime model for studying the efficacy of chemopreventive activity. N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU) is a chemical carcinogen used to induce mammary cancer in a rat model. It is well known that MNU stimulates the growth of estrogen-dependent tumors.[9] Hence, in the present study, we have tried to investigate the effects of ethyl acetate (EA) fraction of C. pulcherrima (EAFCP)flower by in vitro, in vivo, and in silico methods.

 Materials and Methods



Chemicals

All the chemicals and reagents used were of analytical grade. MNU and other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals Private Ltd. (MO, USA).

Plant material

Fresh flowers of C. pulcherrima were collected from the local areas of Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India. Plant taxonomical identification was verified (accession no. 0662) by Prof. Dr. Dhabe, Head of the Botanical Department of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad.

Preparation and phytochemical analysis of the plant extract

Shade-dried flowers (500 g) were powdered and soxhleted with methanol and water (MeOH) for 12 h. The MeOH was removed under vacuum in a rotary vacuum evaporator. The MeOH extract (28 g) rich in polyphenolic compounds was further suspended in 250-ml water, and fractionation was achieved by solvents of increasing polarity (n-hexane, chloroform, and EA). A part of this extract was partitioned with EA which given the fraction with yields 6.6 g. The solvent fractions were concentrated under vacuum in a rotary vacuum evaporator, and the extracts were preserved at 4°C. The flowchart of fractionation is depicted in [Figure 1]. EAFCP has been studied in a further aspect, and it was submitted to high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. The HPLC system was equipped with a dual-pump gradient system, C18 reversed phase column (internal diameter: 4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm). The flow rate and injection volume were 0.7 ml/min and 20 μl, respectively. 0.05% orthophosphoric acid was used as a buffer. Mobile phase A was used as a mixture of buffer: acetonitrile in the ratio of 90:10 and mobile phase B was used as buffer: acetonitrile in the ratio of 10:90 with linear gradient program for elution. The column temperature was maintained at 25°C. The standard solutions of ellagic acid, gallic acid, myricetin, quercetin, rutin, and catechin were injected into the HPLC for analysis.[10] The sample and standard solutions (1 mg/mL) were prepared using appropriate amounts of ellagic acid, gallic acid, myricetin, quercetin, rutin, and catechin dissolved in methanol. The prepared solutions were filtered through a 0.45-mm Durapore ® membrane filter (Millipore; Billerica, MA, USA). The samples were monitored with ultraviolet detection at 280 nm and at ambient temperature separation was achieved with a single linear gradient program. The compounds were identified by comparing the retention time of samples to standards.{Figure 1}

Animals

Virgin female Sprague Dawley ® rats (body weight 160–200 g) were obtained from Wockhardt Research Centre Pvt. Ltd., Aurangabad, India, and housed in standard conditions (12 h light/dark cycle, 20°C ± 2°C; 65% ± 15% relative humidity) with free access to water ad libitum. The entire study was carried out according to the Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA/IAEC/Pharm. Chem.-31/2016-17/129), and efforts were made to reduce animal suffering and number of animals used.

Experimental design

Invitro anticancer screening

In vitro testing was done using sulforhodamine B assay protocols,[11] with each drug tested at five dose levels (10, 25, 50, 100, and 200 μg/ml). Tamoxifen (TAM) and adriamycin (ADR) were run as positive control drugs in each experiment, and each experiment was repeated thrice. Results were presented with reference to growth inhibition (GI) of 50%, total GI, and LC50 values.

In vivo anticancer screening

In this study, animals were divided into the following different groups with six animals in each group: Group I: normal control (0.9% NaCl solution), Group II: cancer induced (MNU and normal saline solution treated), Group III: cancer induced + EAFCP (250 mg/kg, p.o., body weight), Group IV: cancer induced + EAFCP (500 mg/kg, p.o. body weight), and Group V: cancer induced + TAM (2 mg/kg, p.o., body weight) for 4 weeks. Animals in the normal control group and untreated MNU group were given vehicle (0.9% NaCl) according to the experimental protocol.

A fresh solution at a concentration of 10 mg/ml was prepared by wetting the MNU powder with 3% acetic acid and then dissolving it in 0.9% NaCl solution, for each injection. Rats were given intraperitoneal (i.p.) 50 mg/kg of MNU on the 50th day of age. After MNU injection, the presence of mammary tumor masses was assessed by palpation weekly and recorded. MNU gives a high incidence of ER-positive tumor masses. The latency period (time of appearance of the first tumor), tumor burden (number of tumors/rat), and relative size of each tumor were recorded. The tumor diameter was measured by a micrometer caliper, and volume was calculated by using the following formula:

V = 4/3 П r3

Where r is half of the average diameter.

At the end of the treatment, blood was collected from retro-orbital puncture for evaluating estrogen level.[12]

Biochemical assay

Preparation of tissue homogenate

Mammary tumor tissue (100 mg) homogenate was prepared in 0.1 mol/l of Tris-HCl buffer, at pH 7.4, and centrifuged at 3000 ×g for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatant was transferred into a new tube and used for biochemical analysis. The total protein of tumor tissue samples was estimated by Lowry's method.[13]

Lipid peroxidation analysis

Lipid peroxidation (LPO) was estimated colorimetrically by thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances by Niehaus and Samuelsson [14] and by hydroperoxides by the method of Jiang.[15]

Catalase assay

Catalase (CAT) was assayed by the method of Sinha.[16] The enzyme activity was expressed as μM of H2O2 consumed/min/mg protein.

Superoxide dismutase assay

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was assayed according to the method of Kakkar et al.[17] The activity was measured of p-nitro blue tetrazolium chloride (NBT) reduction in light without protein minus NBT reduction with protein. One unit of enzyme activity was established as the amount of enzyme reaction, which gave 50% inhibition of NBT reduction in 1 min.

Glutathione peroxidase assay

Glutathione peroxidase (GPX) assay was measured by the method described by Rotruck.[18] The activity was expressed as μg of reduced glutathione (GSH) consumed/min/mg protein.

Glutathione-S-transferase assay

Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) assay was determined by the method of Habig et al.[19] The activity of GST was expressed as mM of GSH-1-Chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene conjugate formed/min/mg protein using an extinction coefficient of 9.6/mM.

Glutathione reductase assay

Glutathione reductase (GR) activity was measured by the method of Staal et al.[20] The GR activity was expressed as nmoles of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidized/min/mg protein.

Reduced glutathione assay

GSH was determined by the method of Ellman.[21] The values were expressed as mg/100 g tissue.

Histopathological studies

Mammary tumors were removed and washed with an ice-cold buffered saline solution (pH 7.4). They were fixed in 10% formalin for 48 h and were gradually dehydrated in alcohol, cleared of fat with toluene; rehydrated; and embedded in molten paraffin wax. The paraffin-embedded tumors were then cut into thin sections (5 μm) and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) for mammary epithelial cell architecture and toluidine blue (TB) for mast cell analysis.[22],[23]

Annexin V-FITC-propidium iodide assay

MCF-7 cells were plated at 2 × 105 in a six-walled plate and treated with 200 μg/ml of EAFCP for 24 h. The cells were then trypsinized and washed by centrifugation (1200 rpm, 4 min, 4°C) with prechilled phosphate-buffered saline (PBS 1x). The cell pellet was resuspended with 100 μl of the 1x binding buffer with 5 μl of annexin V-FITC and 5 μl of propidium iodide (PI) for 15 min in dark. Then, 400 μl of the binding buffer was added, and the cells were filtered through a cell strainer. Cell cycle analysis was performed on the FACS Aria™, BD, USA scanner (BD Biosciences). Cell debris and aggregates were excluded from the analysis.[24]

Cell cycle analysis

MCF-7 cells were seeded at a density of 2 × 105 cells/ml in a six-walled plate. The cells were preincubated for 12 h and then treated with EAFCP (200 μg/ml) followed by incubation for 24 h. Cells were washed and harvested by trypsinization, collected and fixed in ice-cold 70% ethanol, and again rehydrated with PBS. The pellets were resuspended in 100 μl of PBS containing RNase A (1 mg/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich, #R6513) for 30 min and then incubated in dark at 37°C for 30 min and protected from light. A 10 μl of PI (1 mg/ml) (Sigma, #P4170) was added followed by an incubation of 15 min in dark, and analysis was carried out by BD FACS Aria™ system.[25]

Determination of reactive oxygen species and mitochondrial membrane potential

MCF-7 cells were seeded at a density of 2 × 105 cells/well in a 6-well plate and treated with 200 μg/ml EAFCP for 24 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 and 95% air. Subsequently, the treated cells were collected, washed two times by PBS, and re-suspended in 500 μl of DCFHDA (5 μM) for reactive oxygen species (ROS) estimation and DiOC6 (3) (200 nM) in serum-free media for mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) at 37°C in a dark room for 15 min. The analysis of samples was done using BD FACS Aria™ system.[26]

Docking methodology

Molecular docking study for rutin and catechin was performed using Glide v7.6 program interfaced with Maestro v11.3 of Schrödinger 2017 (Schrodinger, LLC, NY, USA). The crystal structure for ER-α (Protein Data Bank (PDB) ID: Estrogen-related receptor alpha (1ERR)) was taken from RCSB Protein Data Bank and prepared for docking using “protein preparation wizard.” The structure of both compounds was built using Maestro build panel and optimized to low-energy conformers using Ligprep v3.3. The docking study was performed according to previously reported [27] procedures using extra precision docking mode.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's test, and the results were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 6),aP < 0.001,bP < 0.01,cP < 0.05,d nonsignificant.

 Results



High-performance liquid chromatography analysis

The analysis of the EAFCP of the extract showed that the fraction is rich in polyphenols.[8] The HPLC profile of EAFCP showed the presence of several peaks. Chromatographic peaks were identified by comparing the Retention time (RT) of individual standards with the fraction. HPLC chromatogram [Figure 2]a and [Figure 2]b of the extract showed sharp peaks for rutin and catechin.{Figure 2}

In vitro anticancer activity

C. pulcherrima fractions were evaluated for their cytotoxic activity against MCF-12A, MCF-7, and MDA-MB-453 cell lines. TAM and adriamycin were taken as the standard. After treatment, EAFCP revealed inhibitory effect on the growth of MCF-7 with LC50 value of 23.6 μg/ml [Table 1] and [Figure 3].{Table 1}{Figure 3}

Effect of treatment on mammary tumorigenesis

Chemomodulatory effect was observed in the rats treated with EAFCP. Oral administration of EAFCP at doses of 250 and 500 mg/kg extended the latency and reduced the tumor load and volume significantly compared with MNU-treated rats. EAFCP at a dose of 500 mg/kg showed the highest reduction of mammary tumor incidences (66.6%) next to TAM-treated group (33.3%). The data for tumor latency, burden, and volume are summarized in [Table 2].{Table 2}

Effect of treatment on serum estrogen levels

Estrogen levels were analyzed in rat serum after completion of treatment. The MNU and control group estrogen levels were compared which showed notable difference. The mean of the serum estrogen levels of normal and treated groups is summarized in [Table 3]. The treatment makes clear that EAFCP has affinity toward ER as TAM.{Table 3}

Effect of treatment on the oxidative markers

Enhanced LPO of cellular membranes can damage cells, tissues, and organs. The increased LPO in rats exposed to MNU might result from change in the antioxidant enzymes such as CAT, SOD, GPx, GST, GR, and GSH, compared to normal control rats. These enzymes are important scavengers of superoxide ions, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl free radicals. EAFCP administration significantly decreased LPO and increased the activities of antioxidants in a dose-dependent manner [Figure 4].{Figure 4}

Histopathological studies

Histopathological studies of H and E-stained mammary gland [Figure 5]a, [Figure 5]b, [Figure 5]c, [Figure 5]d revealed that the normal architecture was disturbed by MNU induction. Microscopic examination of the section showed tumor tissue comprising of tubules, glandular structure, and cribriform arrangement of cells having hyperchromatic nuclei and scanty cytoplasm. Furthermore, dense lymphoid aggregates and eosinophilic secretions were seen along with fibroadipose tissue and congested blood vessels. An abnormal mitosis was not observed in microscopic analysis. EAFCP-treated rats showed the highest number of necrotic cells and reduced tumor cells. This is due to the potent inhibition of mammary tumor growth. Histopathological examination of TB staining for mast cells is shown in [Figure 5]e, [Figure 5]f, [Figure 5]g, [Figure 5]h. MNU-treated rats (Group II) showed significant increase in mast cell population which was changed by the treatment with TAM and EAFCP.{Figure 5}

Annexin V-FITC-propidium iodide assay

The FITC annexin V apoptosis assay was conducted to check whether the extract is inducing apoptosis or necrosis. Annexin staining showed that the extract induced both apoptosis and necrosis with 24-h treatment [Figure 6]a, [Figure 6]b, [Figure 6]c. The reduction in viable cells and the PI staining were significant, indicating cell death by necroptosis at 47.85% after 24 h.{Figure 6}

Cell cycle analysis

Analysis of cell cycle was conducted to check whether the extract arrests any cell cycle phase. PI staining indicated that treatment of cells for 24 h with EAFCP (200 μg/ml) increased the percentage of cells in subG1 phase population which represents apoptotic population [Figure 7]a, [Figure 7]b, [Figure 7]c. There are few changes in various phases of cell cycle but are not significant with 24-h treatment.{Figure 7}

Reactive oxygen species and mitochondrial membrane potential

MCF-7 was treated with EAFCP (200 μg/ml) for 24 h, and the levels of ROS and MMP were evaluated. A considerable rise in intracellular ROS and MMP level was experienced in the EAFCP-treated MCF-7 cells as compared to the control [Figure 8]a and [Figure 8]b. The results showed that EAFCP might be inducing antiproliferative effect through ROS generation with loss of MMP 24 h after treatment, which proves the role of mitochondria in the cell death observed due to EAFCP treatment.{Figure 8}

 Discussion



The present study demonstrates the chemomodulatory action of EAFCP in MNU-induced carcinogenesis in rat mammary gland. One of the ways to treat cancer is administering natural or synthetic compound for prevention, suppression, or reversion of cancer. Diet rich in vegetables and fruits is associated with reduced incidences of cancer and other diseases.[28] Herbs have been regarded as one of the most visible options for new potent anticancer agents and cancer treatment.[29] It produces diverse biological effects, such as detoxification, scavenging of ROS, and cell proliferation and its regulation.[30]

EAFCP exhibits strong cytotoxic and anti-oxidant activities,[31] which may possibly inhibit the carcinogenesis to transform a normal cell into malignant cells. The presence of rutin and catechin in the fraction is important because this fraction showed the best activity. All the treated groups with EAFCP had statistically significantly (P < 0.001) diminished tumor incidences and increased latency as compared to MNU-treated group. Reduced tumor volume in the treated group indicates that EAFCP seems to be reversing the tumorigenesis. Multistep carcinogenesis process has been divided into initiation, promotion, and progression.[32] The cancer-preventing agent may act dominantly at the initiation or promotion stage of carcinogenesis as an antipromoting agent. Thus, it can be presumed that EAFCP may interfere at the initiation or promotion stage to suppress the growth of the tumor. Decreased tumor burden indicates that EAFCP may also act as an antimetastatic agent. Breast cancers express the ER and progesterone receptor (PR) which respond to therapy with hormones or aromatase inhibitors and shrink breast cancer masses in patients.[33],[34] Elevated serum estradiol levels (E2) are connected with higher risk of breast cancer.[35] E2 promotes cell proliferation and suppresses apoptosis by altering the genetic expression, and thus is considered a key target for treatment.[36] MNU-induced tumors are more estrogen responsive. Natural phytoestrogen may stimulate the apoptotic pathway via modulating estrogen and ERs.[37] Thus, EAFCP may act by modulating estrogen and ERs and regulate the cell death by mitochondria-mediated necroptosis in subG1 phase, which may be due to the presence of polyphenols. In the present study, the activities of antioxidant enzymes such as LPO, CAT, SOD, GPx, GST, GR, and GSH were estimated in mammary tumors of rats. The antioxidant system contributes toward the inhibition of carcinogenesis. Exogenous sources such as environmental pollutants, drugs, radiation, and pathogens are involved in the production of free radicals.[38] Increased production of ROS and a decrease in antioxidant level might be responsible for the increase in LPO. This has been associated with altered membrane structure and enzyme inactivation.[39] Data obtained revealed that a statistically significant (P < 0.001) increase in the antioxidant enzymes and decreased LPO level were found in treated mammary tissue homogenates. In the present study, the protein levels in mammary tumor-induced rats and EAFCP extract-treated rats had a significant difference. The impaired protein levels may influence the course of the disease.

Histopathological study of mammary tissue of rats illustrates ductal carcinoma of the cribriform type with infiltrating malignant tumor. EAFCP- and TAM-treated rats increased tumor tissue necrosis and altered inflammation and tumor tissue ratio. Inflammatory mast cells are the major effector cells and significant for the pro-angiogenic factor to induce tumor growth.[40] An increased number of mast cells create tumor cellular environment for the progression, angiogenesis, and metastasis.[41] In the present histological analysis, mammary tissue showed an increase in mast cell population, which is in conformity with that of the preceding study observations of histological signs in mammary tissue.[42] Alteration in the mammary tissue architecture of EAFCP- and TAM-treated rats may possibly due to its anti-inflammatory activity.

In order to visualize the binding affinity, interaction, and orientation of catechin and rutin, on ligand-binding domain (LBD) of ER-α, the docking studies were performed using Glide and docking scores of catechin and rutin which were found to be −12.626 and −7.262, respectively. Upon ligand binding, the flexible and hydrophobic nature of LBD of ER-α remodels their shapes and stabilizes the ligand–receptor complex by making specific hydrogen bonds and complementary hydrophobic interactions. Thus, both the compounds, catechin and rutin, bind to LBD of ER-α with a comparable binding affinity [Figure 9]a and [Figure 9]b. The hydroxyl groups of both catechin and rutin formed hydrogen bonds with amino acid residues Leu346, Thr347, Asp351, Glu353, Arg394, Met421, and His524 in the LBD of ER-α, which stabilizes the ligand–enzyme complex. Apart from hydrogen bonds, catechin also formed pi–pi bonding with Phe404 to enhance hydrophobic interaction with LBD of ER-α.{Figure 9}

 Conclusion



The results of this study showed that the number of phytoconstituents of EAFCP may have synergistically participated in the preventive MNU-induced mammary carcinogenesis in rats. A positive correlation was found between catechin, rutin, and binding affinity for the ER-α of EAFCP, which indicates that it could be the major contributors in the chemoprevention. Our results strongly highlight the possible use of EAFCP as an economic value added in ingredients in nutraceutical products to prevent/treat mammary carcinoma.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Mrs. Fatima Rafiq Zakaria, Chairman, Maulana Azad Educational Trust, Dr. Rafiq Zakaria Campus, Aurangabad 431001 (MS), India, for providing the laboratory facility. The authors are also grateful to Dr. Sachin Kale, M.D. (Pathology), and Dr. Shrikant Satale, M.V. Sc. (veterinary pathologist), for making critical comments and suggestions on the histopathology.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Suba Z. Triple-negative breast cancer risk in women is defined by the defect of estrogen signaling: Preventive and therapeutic implications. Onco Targets Ther 2014;7:147-64.
2Yang J, Nakagawa H, Tsuta K, Tsubura A. Influence of perinatal genistein exposure on the development of MNU-induced mammary carcinoma in female Sprague-Dawley rats. Cancer Lett 2000;149:171-9.
3Desai AG, Qazi GN, Ganju RK, El-Tamer M, Singh J, Saxena AK, et al. Medicinal plants and cancer chemoprevention. Curr Drug Metab 2008;9:581-91.
4Arumugam A, Agullo P, Boopalan T, Nandy S, Lopez R, Gutierrez C, et al. Neem leaf extract inhibits mammary carcinogenesis by altering cell proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. Cancer Biol Ther 2014;15:26-34.
5Saha SK, Lee SB, Won J, Choi HY, Kim K, Yang GM, et al. Correlation between oxidative stress, nutrition, and cancer initiation. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18. pii: E1544.
6Yamuna ST, Padma PR. Antioxidant potential of the flowers of Caesalpinia pulcherrima, Swartz in an in vitro system subjected to oxidative stress. J Pharm Res 2013;7:661-5.
7Chew YL, Chan EW, Tan PL, Lim YY, Stanslas J, Goh JK. Assessment of phytochemical content, polyphenolic composition, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of leguminosae medicinal plants in Peninsular Malaysia. BMC Complement Altern Med 2011;11:12.
8Srinivas KV, Koteswara Rao Y, Mahender I, Das B, Rama Krishna KV, Hara Kishore K, et al. Flavanoids from Caesalpinia pulcherrima. Phytochemistry 2003;63:789-93.
9Rajakumar T, Pugalendhi P, Thilagavathi S. Dose response chemopreventive potential of allyl isothiocyanate against 7,12-dimethylbenz (a) anthracene induced mammary carcinogenesis in female Sprague-Dawley rats. Chem Biol Interact 2015;231:35-43.
10Goh KL. Malaysian Herbs. Vol. 2. Klang: Goh Kong Ling; 2004.
11Dube PN, Mokale SN. Design and synthesis of some novel estrogen receptor modulators as anti-breast cancer agents: In vitro and in vivo screening, docking analysis. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 2016;16:1461-7.
12Mokale SN, Begum A, Sakle NS, Shelke VR, Bhavale SA. Design, synthesis and anticancer screening of some novel3-(3-(substituted phenyl) acryloyl)-2H-chromen-2-ones as selective anti-breast cancer agent. Biomed Pharmacother 2017;89:966-72.
13Sharmila G, Bhat FA, Arunkumar R, Elumalai P, Raja Singh P, Senthilkumar K, et al. Chemopreventive effect of quercetin, a natural dietary flavonoid on prostate cancer in in vivo model. Clin Nutr 2014;33:718-26.
14Niehaus WG Jr., Samuelsson B. Formation of malondialdehyde from phospholipid arachidonate during microsomal lipid peroxidation. Eur J Biochem 1968;6:126-30.
15Jiang ZY, Hunt JV, Wolff SP. Ferrous ion oxidation in the presence of xylenol orange for detection of lipid hydroperoxide in low density lipoprotein. Anal Biochem 1992;202:384-9.
16Sinha AK. Colorimetric assay of catalase. Anal Biochem 1972;47:389-94.
17Kakkar P, Das B, Viswanathan PN. A modified spectrophotometric assay of superoxide dismutase. Indian J Biochem Biophys 1984;21:130-2.
18Rotruck JT, Pope AL, Ganther HE, Swanson AB, Hafeman DG, Hoekstra WG, et al. Selenium: Biochemical role as a component of glutathione peroxidase. Science 1973;179:588-90.
19Habig WH, Pabst MJ, Jakoby WB. Glutathione S-transferases. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J Biol Chem 1974;249:7130-9.
20Staal GE, Visser J, Veeger C. Purification and properties of glutathione reductase of human erythrocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1969;185:39-48.
21Ellman GL. Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Arch Biochem Biophys 1959;82:70-7.
22Russo J, Russo IH. Atlas and histologic classification of tumors of the rat mammary gland. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2000;5:187-200.
23Migliaccio AR, Rana RA, Sanchez M, Lorenzini R, Centurione L, Bianchi L, et al. GATA-1 as a regulator of mast cell differentiation revealed by the phenotype of the GATA-1low mouse mutant. J Exp Med 2003;197:281-96.
24Freitas DD, Morgado-Díaz JA, Gehren AS, Vidal FC, Fernandes RM, Romão W, et al. Cytotoxic analysis and chemical characterization of fractions of the hydroalcoholic extract of the Euterpe oleracea mart. Seed in the MCF-7 cell line. J Pharm Pharmacol 2017;69:714-21.
25Gao F, Liu W, Guo Q, Bai Y, Yang H, Chen H. Physcion blocks cell cycle and induces apoptosis in human B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells by downregulating HOXA5. Biomed Pharmacother 2017;94:850-7.
26Chiang JH, Yang JS, Ma CY, Yang MD, Huang HY, Hsia TC, et al. Danthron, an anthraquinone derivative, induces DNA damage and caspase cascades-mediated apoptosis in SNU-1 human gastric cancer cells through mitochondrial permeability transition pores and bax-triggered pathways. Chem Res Toxicol 2011;24:20-9.
27Lokwani D, Shah R, Mokale S, Shastry P, Shinde D. Development of energetic pharmacophore for the designing of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine derivatives as selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2012;26:267-77.
28Boeing H, Bechthold A, Bub A, Ellinger S, Haller D, Kroke A, et al. Critical review: Vegetables and fruit in the prevention of chronic diseases. Eur J Nutr 2012;51:637-63.
29Ivanova D, Gerova D, Chervenkov T, Yankova T. Polyphenols and antioxidant capacity of Bulgarian medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol 2005;96:145-50.
30Mahassni SH, Al-Reemi RM. Apoptosis and necrosis of human breast cancer cells by an aqueous extract of garden cress (Lepidium sativum) seeds. Saudi J Biol Sci 2013;20:131-9.
31Bashkaran K, Zunaina E, Bakiah S, Sulaiman SA, Sirajudeen K, Naik V. Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of Tualang honey in alkali injury on the eyes of rabbits: Experimental animal study. BMC Complement Altern Med 2011;11:90.
32Barrett JC. Mechanisms of multistep carcinogenesis and carcinogen risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect 1993;100:9-20.
33Deroo BJ, Korach KS. Estrogen receptors and human disease. J Clin Invest 2006;116:561-70.
34Ellis MJ, Suman VJ, Hoog J, Lin L, Snider J, Prat A, et al. Randomized phase II neoadjuvant comparison between letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-rich stage 2 to 3 breast cancer: Clinical and biomarker outcomes and predictive value of the baseline PAM50-based intrinsic subtype – ACOSOG Z1031. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:2342-9.
35Haakensen VD, Bjøro T, Lüders T, Riis M, Bukholm IK, Kristensen VN, et al. Serum estradiol levels associated with specific gene expression patterns in normal breast tissue and in breast carcinomas. BMC Cancer 2011;11:332.
36Katzenellenbogen BS, Katzenellenbogen JA. Estrogen receptor transcription and transactivation: Estrogen receptor alpha and estrogen receptor beta: Regulation by selective estrogen receptor modulators and importance in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2000;2:335-44.
37Bilal I, Chowdhury A, Davidson J, Whitehead S. Phytoestrogens and prevention of breast cancer: The contentious debate. World J Clin Oncol 2014;5:705-12.
38Ansari KN. The free radicals the hidden culprits an update. Indian J. Med. Sci 1997; 51:319-36.
39Niki E, Yoshida Y, Saito Y, Noguchi N. Lipid peroxidation: Mechanisms, inhibition, and biological effects. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005;338:668-76.
40Tomita M, Matsuzaki Y, Onitsuka T. Effect of mast cells on tumor angiogenesis in lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:1686-90.
41Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature 2002;420:860-7.
42Bak MJ, Das Gupta S, Wahler J, Suh N. Role of dietary bioactive natural products in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Semin Cancer Biol 2016;40-41:170-91.