Home | About PM | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact us |  Login 
Pharmacognosy Magazine
Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
 


 
  Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 16  |  Issue : 72  |  Page : 713-721  

Bioactivity-guided isolation, characterization, and estimation of esculetin – A Potential Marker from Launaea pinnatifida cass


PhD Scholar, School of Pharmacy, RK University, Rajkot, Gujarat, India

Date of Submission29-Jun-2020
Date of Decision25-Aug-2020
Date of Acceptance03-Dec-2020
Date of Web Publication16-Feb-2021

Correspondence Address:
Himanshu Makwana
PhD Scholar, School of Pharmacy, RK University, Rajkot, Gujarat
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/pm.pm_264_20

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Background: Loss of expertise in Sanskrit language and medicinal plant identification as per ayurvedic texts has resulted in the creation of “Controversial Drugs,” i.e., plants with different botanical identities being used by the same name Launaea pinnatifida Cass. It is one of the species of one such traditional Indian ayurvedic herb known as “Gojihva.” As per the ayurvedic and modern research, Gojihva possesses hepatoprotective, diuretic, galactagogue, and blood-purifying properties. The present study was aimed at bioactivity-guided isolation, characterization, and estimation of a marker compound obtained from L. pinnatifida. Materials and Methods: Fractions were obtained through the successive solvent extraction technique and subjected to in vitro antioxidant and hepatoprotective bioassays which signified that the methanol extract of leaves had significantly better pharmacological activity. Hence, the methanol extract was subjected to further isolation of the active compound. Estimation of the isolated compound was carried out by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and high-performance thin-layer chromatography fingerprinting. Results: A marker compound was isolated from chloroform:ethyl acetate (90:10) fraction and elucidated to be esculetin based on its spectral analysis (Fourier transform infrared, liquid chromatography–mass spectroscopy, 13C nuclear magnetic resonance, and ultraviolet). The percentage purity and yield of esculetin in methanol extract of leaf fractions was found to be 99.75% and 0.927%, respectively, by HPLC. Conclusion: Esculetin has been reported for the first time in L. pinnatifida. Hence, it can be used as the bioactive marker for this plant. This marker can also be useful in the development of hepatoprotective formulations as well as standardization and quality control of L. pinnatifida formulations.

Keywords: Antioxidant assay, bioactivity-guided isolation, Gojihva, hepatoprotective activity, Launaea pinnatifida, spectral technique


How to cite this article:
Makwana H, Pandya D. Bioactivity-guided isolation, characterization, and estimation of esculetin – A Potential Marker from Launaea pinnatifida cass. Phcog Mag 2020;16:713-21

How to cite this URL:
Makwana H, Pandya D. Bioactivity-guided isolation, characterization, and estimation of esculetin – A Potential Marker from Launaea pinnatifida cass. Phcog Mag [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 9];16:713-21. Available from: http://www.phcog.com/text.asp?2020/16/72/713/309311



SUMMARY

  • Methanolic extract of leaves of Launaea pinnatifida and esculetin isolated there from possesses marked antioxidant and hepatoprotective activity in a dose-dependent manner. Esculetin may serve as a marker for the standardization of this plant, which can help in differentiating it from other species of the controversial plant Gojihva.


Abbreviations used: NMR: Nuclear magnetic resonance; LC-MS/MS: Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry; HepG2: Liver hepatocellular carcinoma; DPPH: 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl; FRAP assay: Ferric reducing antioxidant power assay; H2O2 assay: Hydrogen peroxide assay; TAC assay: Total antioxidant capacity assay; PCM: Paracetamol; MTT: Methylthiazolyldiphenyl-tetrazolium bromide; DMSO: Dimethyl sulfoxide; SSE: Successive solvent extraction; HPLC: High-performance liquid chromatography; HPTLC: High-performance thin-layer chromatography; 13C NMR: Carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance; ANOVA: Analysis of variance; TLC: Thin-layer chromatography; UV: Ultraviolet; VLC: Vacuum liquid chromatography; FTIR: Fourier transform infrared; LCMS: Liquid chromatography–mass spectroscopy; NSAIDs: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; IC50: Half-maximal inhibitory concentration; L. pinnatifida: Launaea pinnatifida; LPLPE: Launaea pinnatifida leaf petroleum ether extract; LPLC: Launaea pinnatifida leaf chloroform extract; LPLM: Launaea pinnatifida leaf methanol extract; LPLW: Launaea pinnatifida leaf water extract; LPRPE: Launaea pinnatifida root petroleum ether extract; LPRC: Launaea pinnatifida root chloroform extract; LPRM: Launaea pinnatifida root methanol extract; LPRW: Launaea pinnatifida root water extract; ROS: Reactive oxygen species; GBD: Global burden of disease; WHO: World Health Organization.




   Introduction Top


The liver is also known as the fighting organ of the human body, playing a vital role in many physiological processes.[1],[2] Many essential body functions were done by the liver, such as storage, secretion, and most vital metabolism.[3] Detoxification of noxious substances is the most fundamental function of the liver.[4] Generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) leads to the induction of liver diseases such as hepatocellular carcinoma, fever, and hepatitis. Overproduction of ROS plays an essential role in liver damage; many plant antioxidants have been isolated and used as a medicinal agent to prevent liver damage. Secondary metabolites such as polyphenols, flavonoids, and coumarins are conscientious for the antioxidant properties of plants, which play a significant role in the neutralization of ROS.[5] Many environmental factors are responsible for the generation of ROS, which leads to cell damage and cell death. Liver cirrhosis is a result of almost all liver diseases identified by necrosis and fibrosis. Currently, alcohol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and viral hepatitis are the main causative factors that lead to liver damage. According to the information given by the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) project by the WHO,[6] liver disease rates are gradually escalated since the last few years. Recently, almost 50 million peoples, including adults, would be suffering from chronic liver disease.[7] Hence, there is an urgent need to isolate new photochemical and evaluate its potency scientifically. In India, only very few herbal formulations are used to treat liver damage with clinically proven data. Among such herbal formulation, Liv 52 DS tablet from Himalaya Health Care is the more trusted drug in the Indian market for maintaining liver health.[8],[9] Clinical trials with human volunteers are not all the time for the herbal formulation to evaluate the efficacy and potency; hence, in vitro cell lines are the first choice in such cases. In vitro cell line assay is a rapid analytical measure to evaluate the therapeutic potency and efficacy of the herbal drug.

Almost 30% of herbal plants mentioned in the Indian classical system of medicine belong to the class of controversial plants because of its mistaken morphological and botanical identity.[10],[11],[12],[13] Thirty-two percent of medicinal plants belong to the controversial drug but are widely used in herbal industries because of the lack of authentification of correct species.[13] Hence, there is a need to isolated phytochemicals from such plants and established the reference standard or phytochemical biomarkers for the standardized plant. Launaea pinnatifida (L. pinnatifida) also recognized as Launaea sarmentosa (Willd.) belongs to family Asteraceae (Compositae).[12],[14] It has been traditionally used as a folk herbal remedy for many diseases. As per the ayurvedic literature, L. pinnatifida belongs to the class of controversial drug “Gojihva” (shape and texture of the leaves of the plant are similar to cow's tongue).[15] The plant is well known for its medicinal properties but scientifically not much explored. According to the literature survey, six different medicinal plant species are considered as Gojihva, namely L. pinnatifida, Onosma bracteatum, Elephantopus scaber, Anchusa strigosa, Macrotomia benthami, and Coccinia glauca.[15] However, the plant remains largely unexplored. Systematic pharmacological evaluation of the plant by modern methods is not yet done, and the traditional medicinal uses suggest that it may yield important bioactive phytoconstituents; the basic aspect of medicinal plant research is plant authentication as per ayurvedic literature. Our work is mainly concerned with the bioactive-guided isolation, characterization, and estimations of the active compound by in vitro assay methods to explore the plant in the direction of phytochemistry and generate authentic data to standardize and distinguish the plant among other species of Gojihva.


   Materials and Methods Top


Chemical and reagents

All chemicals and reagents were analytical grades that were purchased from Finar Ltd., Ahmedabad. DPPH and all the high purity standards, namely gallic acid and ascorbic acid, were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Silica gel G 100–200 mesh was purchased from Finar Ltd., Ahmedabad. Silica gel G 60-120 mesh (for column chromatography) was purchased from Spectrochem Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai. Fetal bovine serum (FBS), 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM), phosphate-buffered saline, trypsin, glucose, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and hydrogen peroxide were obtained from Hi-Media Laboratories Ltd., Mumbai.

Plant material

The fresh leaves and roots of plant L. pinnatifida were collected in May 2017 from Nagoa Beach, Diu (A union territory in West India). The authentification of the plant was done by Dr. Hitesh Solanki, Professor, Department of Botany, School of Science, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad. The geographical coordinate of plant location was 20°42′30.5 ′′N, 70°53′35.3 ′′E. The voucher specimen (Voucher no. HM1) was deposited at the Herbarium Unit of the Department of Botany, School of Science, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, for future reference. In this study, dried leaves and roots of the plant have been used.

Preparation of extracts and fractions

The powdered shade-dried leaves (300 g) and roots (200 g) were extracted with series of solvents of increasing priority in the Soxhlet apparatus as follows: petroleum ether (60°C–80°C), chloroform, methanol, and water. The material was thoroughly dried each time before extracting it with the next solvent. A total of 8 fractions were prepared in the same manner. The percentage yield of L. pinnatifida leaf petroleum ether fraction (LPPE), chloroform fraction (LPLC), methanol fraction (PLLM), and water fraction (LPLW) were found to be 1.706%, 2.121%, 10.128%, and 7.839%, respectively. Furthermore, the percentage yield of L. pinnatifida root petroleum ether fraction (LPRPE), chloroform fraction (LPRC), methanol fraction (LPRM), and water fraction (LPRW) was found to be 1.606%, 0.887%, 14.410%, and 12.811%, respectively.

All crude fractions were filtered and dried under reduced pressure at 40°C using a rotary evaporator. Among all fractions, methanol fraction (LPLM) showed more hepatoprotective and antioxidant activity. Therefore, LPLM fraction was subjected to bioactivity-guided fractionation assay for the isolation of more potent compound.[16],[17] Further, LPLM (10.128 g) was subjected to vacuum liquid chromatography (VLC1). The bioactive fraction was adsorbed on silica (60–120 mesh size) with a 1:1 ratio. Ethyl acetate and methanol were used with different ratios for isolation of bioactive compound, for example, 100% ethyl acetate (LPLM/F1, 0.6896 g and 4.31%), 50:50 v/v ethyl acetate:methanol (LPLM/F2, 5.2766 g and 32.97%), and 100% methanol (LPLM/F3, 8.9331 g and 55.89%). The volume of each fraction collected was 900 ml. Each fraction was concentrated under reduced pressure at 40°C using a rotary evaporator. The most active fraction of LPLM/F3 was subjected to second VLC (VLC 2). This time only two solvents were used for separation of compounds: 100% ethyl acetate fraction (LPLM/F3/EA) and 100% methanol fraction (LPLM/F3/MEOH). LPLM/F3/EA showed significant bioactivity and subjected to silica gel column chromatography (LPLM/F3/EA 1.7 g with 10 g silica gel 230-400 #), eluting with a gradient mixture of ethyl acetate and chloroform (100/0; 90/10; 80/20; 70/30; 60/40; 50/50; 40/60; 30/70; 20/80; 10/90; 0/100). Glass column length was 18” and diameter of 1”. Fraction 46–51 (assigned as F46) shown a single bend on thin-layer chromatography (TLC); hence, all the fractions were pooled together and concentrate on dryness. The TLC was done using chloroform:ethyl acetate:formic acid (7:2.5:0.5) as the mobile phase. Isolated compound esculetin (90 mg) was subjected to the 4–5 solvent system for TLC development to identify the non-polar and polar impurities. The purity of the isolated compound was achieved by a repeated recrystallization technique using methanol. TLC solvent system chloroform:ethyl acetate:formic acid (7:2.5:0.5) indicates the single spot at Rf value 0.30 (under ultraviolet [UV] 366 nm). Hence, a further study was carried out for the elucidation of structure.

Characterization of the isolated compound

The isolated bioactive pure compound was then characterized by the various spectral techniques, namely Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), 1H NMR, liquid chromatography–mass spectroscopy, and UV as well as a comparison of these data with data in the literature.

Ultraviolet-visible analysis

The full scan of 200–800 nm was performed to find out λmax by UV-visible spectrophotometer, Shimadzu 1800, Japan, with serial no. A11455009148.

Liquid chromatography–mass spectroscopy analysis

The isolated compound in LPLM fraction was evaluated using an Agilent UHPLC 1290 instrument coupled to Agilent LC-QToF 6545 mass spectrometer. The mass spectrometric behavior of active fractions was studied for positive ion mode. The sample was prepared in methanol. The following instrument settings were used for analysis: column Agilent C18 Poroshell (100 mm × 4.6 mm × 2.7 μm); the column was kept at room temperature; ionizing voltage, 3500 V; nebulizer gas (N2), 35 psig, 11 L/min; fragmentor voltage, 130 V; nozzle voltage, 1000 V; drying gas (N2), 11 L/min; acquisition range, 100–1500 m/z; a mixture of ammonium acetate (A) and CAN (B) gradient, 80:10%; and ammonium acetate for 30 min was selected as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.4 ml/min.

13C nuclear magnetic resonance analysis

13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of the isolated compound were measured by Bruker Ultrashield 500 Mz instrument at the National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India. DMSO was used as a solvent and TMS was used as an internal standard. Chemical shift values were recorded δ (ppm) and are depicted in [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Characterization of an isolated compound by (a) 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of an isolated compound, (b) Fourier transform infrared spectra of an isolated compound

Click here to view


Fourier transform infrared analysis

FTIR study was performed and FTIR spectra were recorded on Bruker compact FTIR spectrometer with software OPUS version 7.5 at AUM Research Labs., Ahmedabad. Isolated compound C1 were pelleted with potassium bromide (KBr). FTIR spectral data were recorded and are depicted in [Figure 1]b. Functional group stretching and bending wavelength was matched with literature published data.[18]

Estimation of an isolated compound in Launaea pinnatifida leaf methanol extract fraction

High-performance liquid chromatography analysis

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) estimation of the isolated compound was performed using Agilent 1200 infinity instrument (Agilent Technology, USA) and equipped with a DAD detector, an autosampler, a column heater, and Welchrom® C18 (4.67 mm ID, 250 mm, 5 μm particle size) column.The mobile phase consisted of two solvents: (A) 0.140 g of anhydrous potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate (KH2PO) dissolved in 900 ml HPLC grade water with addition of 0.5 ml orthophosphoric acid, made up to 1000 ml with water and filtered through a 0.45 μ membrane filter and degassed in a sonicator for 3 min.; and, (B) Acetonitrile (HPLC grade). With a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min, gradient elution was performed using the two solvents at 348 nm detection wavelength. AQ4μ20 μl sample volume was injected into the system by the autosampler. 10.97 mg of the isolated Esculetin was dissolved in 10 ml methanol, whereas 6.26 mg LPLM (considered as sample) was also dissolved in 10 ml methanol. HPLC was then performed for both standard and sample. Analytical HPLC chromatogram of isolated compounds and LPLM are depicted in [Figure 2]a and [Figure 2]b, respectively.
Figure 2: Analytical high-performance liquid chromatography chromatogram of (a) isolated compound from Launaea pinnatifida methanol fraction. (b) Crude methanol fraction (LPLM) from Launaea pinnatifida

Click here to view


High-performance thin-layer chromatography analysis

HPLTC analysis of LPLM and LPLM/F3 fractions was performed on percolated high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) plate silica gel 60 F254 (20.0 × 10.0 cm) manufactured by E. MERCK using a Camag Linomat V sample applicator and a Hamilton syringe with 100 μl volume capacity. Total 12 bands were spotted on a silica plate with a 6 mm bandwidth, 15 mm margin at X position, and 8 mm margin from Y position (bottom). A constant application rate of 150 nl/s was used using inert gas. TLC plate was developed in the mobile phase of chloroform:methanol:formic acid (8.5:1:0.5) for separation. Camag twin trough glass chamber (20 × 10 cm) was used for the linear ascending development, which is 30 min presaturated with 10 ml of the mobile phase. After the completion of plate development, the HPTLC plate was dried with a hairdryer at 50°C for 5 min. The slit dimension settings of length 4 mm and width 0.30 mm and a scanning rate of 20 mm/s were employed. Densitometric scanning was performed with reflectance mode at λmax at 348 nm using on Camag TLC scanner 2.01.02 and incorporation with by win CATS software. Deuterium lamp (D2 lamp) was used as a source of radiation. The estimation of the isolated compound was done via height and peak area [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Analytical high-performance thin-layer chromatography chromatogram, (a) Calibration curve as per peak area, (b) 3D chromatogram of various standard concentrations, LPLM and LPLM/F3 fraction, (c) Isolated compound esculetin as standard, (d) LPLM fraction as sample, (e) Thin-layer chromatography plate spotted with standard (1–8 spots), LPLM (9 and 10), and LPLM/F3 (11 and 12)

Click here to view


Procedure

The isolated compound served as standard and LPLM fraction as a sample. Sample and standard were applied on the HPTLC plate, and the plate was developed in chloroform:methanol:formic acid (8.5:1:0.5) solvent system. The plate was dried using a hairdryer. The plate was scanned at 348 nm. The Rf value of the selected band was recorded.

Biological activities

In vitro antioxidant activity

1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging activity

The DPPH-free radical scavenging activity of all fractions obtained from SSE and VLC was carried out as per the methods given by Gyamfi et al.[19] Ascorbic acid was the reference standard, and the experiment was performed in triplicate. The IC50 value was calculated for each fraction. A decrease in absorbance indicated higher free radical scavenging activity. The following equation calculated the percentage of DPPH scavenging effect:

% inhibition = [(Abs control − Abs sample]/Abs control) × 100.

Ferric reducing antioxidant power assay

Ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) model was used as an alternative radical scavenging activity.[20] Ascorbic acid was chosen as a reference standard. Various concentrations of sample and standard were evaluated for % inhibition. Absorbance was measured on an ultraviolet spectrophotometer at 700 nm; results were given in terms of IC50. % inhibition of FRAP by each concentration of fractions was calculated as:

% inhibition = ([Absorbance of control − Absorbance of test]/Absorbance of control) × 100.

Hydrogen peroxide scavenging (H2O2) assay

The hydrogen peroxide scavenging (H2O2) method was performed to determine the antioxidant activity of all fractions.[5],[21] In this method, ascorbic acid was used as a reference standard. Different concentrations of fractions (10, 50, 100, 250, and 500 μg/ml) in distilled water were added to a hydrogen peroxide solution (3 ml, 40 mmol/L). The absorbance value was measured using a UV spectrophotometer at 230 nm. % inhibition of H2O2 by each concentration of fractions was calculated as:

% inhibition = ([Abs control − Abs sample]/Abs control) × 100.

All tests were performed in a set of triplicates, and results were expressed in terms of IC50 value.

Total antioxidant capacity

The total antioxidant capacity assay of all the fractions and extracts of L. pinnatifida was carried out by the phosphomolybdenum method employing ascorbic acid as a reference standard.[22] The final absorbance was measured at 695 nm using a UV-visible spectrophotometer against a blank. The IC50 value was calculated from the standard calibration curve.

In vitro hepatoprotective cell line assay

HepG2 cells (human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line) were obtained from National Centre for Cell Science NCCS Complex, Savitribai Phule Pune University Campus, Pune, Maharashtra State, India. The cell line was subcultured in minimum essential medium (MEM) and incubated at 37°C in a CO2 incubator.[5] HepG2 cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 100 units/ml penicillin, 10% FBS, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. Isolated compound and all fractions were subjected to cell line assay. Silymarin (125, 250, 500, and 1000 μg/ml) was used as a positive control, whereas paracetamol (PCM, 25 mM)[23] was used as a negative control. Cytotoxicity was assessed by measuring the percentage cell viability of HepG2 cells in the presence of PCM by MTT reduction assay. Enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay reader measured absorbance at 570 nm, and it is directly proportional to the cell viability of the cell. The percentage of cell viability was calculated using the following formula:

% cell viability= ([Abs control/Abs test] × 100).

Statistical analysis

All the results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was done by one-way ANOVA test followed by Dunnett's multiple comparisons test using GraphPad Prism software with the latest version 8. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.


   Results and Discussion Top


Extraction and bioactivity-guided isolation of active compounds

In this study, methanol fraction of L. pinnatifida leaves was found to be more active in antioxidants and hepatoprotective in vitro assay as compared among all other fractions. Hence, this fraction was selected for further partition. Afterward, VLC1 was carried out and three fractions were obtained. The percentage yield of all the LPLM/F1, LPLM/F2, and LPLM/F3 was found to be 4.31, 32.97, and 55.89, respectively. LPLM/F3 showed more antioxidant and hepatoprotective activity.

Further fractionation was carried out for LMLM/F3 fraction by VLC, which results in two new subfractions (LPLM/F3/EA and LPLM/F1/MEOH). LPLM/F3/EA showed significant hepatoprotective activity as compared to LPLM/F1/MEOH. Further, column chromatography was performed for LPLM/F1/EA fraction, which yielded Esculetin from the fraction F46. Further purification of esculetin was done by repeated recrystallization. In this way, broad bioactivity-guided isolation leads to first-time isolation of florescent coumarin esculetin from L. pinnatifida leaves.

Structure elucidation of the isolated compound esculetin

LPLM fraction was fractionated with bioactivity-guided isolation, and one compound was isolated and then elucidated by UV, LC-MS, 13C NMR, and FTIR spectral technique. Esculetin was obtained as off white to pale yellowish color amorphous powder. Melting point decomposes at 272°C–275°C, matched with the Combined Chemical Dictionary database, which was matched with esculetin.[24] UV results confirmed the λmax, 348 nm. The molecular formula, C9H6O4, was established based on MS ([M + H] + ion peak at 179.03) and NMR data. Fragmentation pattern indicates the presence of esculetin in LPLM fraction. 13C NMR was carried out in DMSO. Additional structural information was conclusively revealed regarding the pure isolated compounds by the 13C NMR. NMR signals were matched with literature, which showed the similarity with the 13C NMR spectra of Esculetin. These 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO D6) spectra revealed the following δ values which indicated the presence of specific functional groups (mentioned in the brackets): 161.26 (CO), 150.82 (C), 148.94 (C), 144.86 (C), 143.31 (C), 112.76 (CH), 111.95 (CH), 111.95 (CH), 111.22 (CH) and 103.10 (CH). The FTIR spectroscopy is an advanced instrumentation technique for the identification of functional groups in the compound. FTIR (KBr) spectra revealed the peaks at 3183.0239 cm-1, 2416.5986 cm-1, 1564.8022 cm-1, 1464.6614 cm-1 and 1195.9922 cm-1. Analysis and comparison of all the spectral data with already published literature data[25] allowed us to elucidate the structure of esculetin [Figure 4].
Figure 4: Structure of an isolated compound esculetin

Click here to view


Estimation of isolated compound esculetin by high-performance liquid chromatography

The isolated compound was used as a standard for the quantification of esculetin in the LPLM fraction. Samples were analyzed at various concentrations to minimize experimental error and improve the accuracy and precision of the method. All the validation parameters, including the lower limit of quantification and relative standard deviation (RSD), were performed. Standard and LPLM fraction showed a characteristic peak of esculetin at a retention time of 9.8884 and 9.810 min, respectively. L. pinnatifida contains the highest amount of esculetin in LPLM fraction, which was calculated as 0.927% concerning 99.75% purity of standard esculetin.

Quantification of an isolated compound in Launaea pinnatifida leaf methanol extract and Launaea pinnatifida leaf methanol extract/F3 fractions by high-performance liquid chromatography

ICH Q2-R1 guidelines were followed for the quantification of standard marker compounds in plant fractions.[26] [Table 1] indicates the calibration curve data (as per peak area) of the isolated compound by HPTLC methods, whereas [Figure 3] indicates the chromatograms of standard and fractions. HPTLC fingerprint profile showed that the fluorescent violet color band at Rf 0.40 was in both LPLM and LPLM/F3. The florescent violet band (under 348 nm) at Rf 0.40 was selected as a marker compound and acknowledged as esculetin standard.
Table 1: Calibration curve data and estimation of esculetin in Launaea pinnatifida leaf methanol and Launaea pinnatifida leaf methanol/F3 fraction by high-performance thin-layer chromatography analysis

Click here to view


The percentage (w/w) amount of isolated compound esculetin was found to be 0.1261% and 0.4204% (as per peak height), respectively, whereas 0.1232% and 0.4088% (as per peak area) in LPLM and LPLM/F3 fractions, respectively.

In vitro antioxidant activity

The antioxidant properties of the L. pinnatifida leaf and root fractions were carried out by standard listed methods. In all four antioxidant assays, ascorbic acid showed at least IC50 which proves the best antioxidant potential as a standard drug, followed by LPLM/F3 and LPLM fractions.

The DDPH scavenging activity of all the extracts and fractions of L. pinnatifida was determined and the IC50 values are given in [Table 2]. Among all the fractions obtained by SSE, LPLM fractions showed significant DPPH scavenging activity with the 17.94 ± 0.37 μg/ml IC50 value which is nearest to the IC50 value of standard ascorbic acid (16.53 ± 1.28 μg/ml). The LPLM/F3 showed the highest activity (IC50 = 21.77 ± 2.47 μg/ml) among all other subfractions obtained through VLC1.
Table 2: In vitro antioxidant assay results in terms of IC50 (μg/ml) for 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl, ferric reducing antioxidant power, H2O2, and total antioxidant capacity assays

Click here to view


The extract and fractions showed concentration-dependent DPPH discoloration assay with scavenging activity with LPLM and LPLM/F3 showing the least IC50 value of 17.94 ± 0.37 μg/ml and 21.77 ± 2.47 μg/ml for LPLM and LPLM/F3, respectively; hence, fraction F3 was considered to be the most potent and shown highest % scavenging of DPPH radicals. FRAP-free radical scavenging increased with increasing concentrations of fractions with LPLM and LPLP/F3 showing the lowest IC50 values (26.18 ± 2.67 and 21.92 ± 4.55 μg/ml, respectively). The LPLM extract showed 26.18 ± 2.67 μg/ml, 85.84 ± 9.18 μg/ml, and 14.78 ± 1.84 μg/ml in

FRAP, H2O2, and TAC assays, respectively. The LPLM/F3 fractions showed IC50 21.77 ± 2.47 μg/ml, 21.92 ± 4.55 μg/ml, 85.29 ± 11.53 μg/ml, and 10.29 ± 3.67 μg/ml in DPPH, FRAP, H2O2 and TAC assays, respectively. The IC50 values are recorded in [Table 2].

The potency of the extract/fractions was found to be in the following order: LPRC > LPRPE > PLRW > LPLC > LPLPE > LPLM/F1 > LPLW > LPLM/F2 > LPRM in all antioxidant assays. The highest % scavenging activity was observed by standard ascorbic acid (3.442 ± 0.89 μg/ml) followed by LPLM/F3 (10.29 ± 3.67 μg/ml) in TAC assay. The free radical scavenging potential of the entire fraction is directly proportional to the concentration of sample, and a lower IC50 value indicates the batter antioxidant potential. Based on in vitro assay results, LPLM/F3 fraction was selected and subjected to further isolation of a more potent bioactive compound using column chromatography.

In vitro hepatoprotective activity

In this study, the hepatoprotective effect of bioactive compounds isolated from L. pinnatifida on the HepG2 cell line was investigated. The treatment of HepG2 cells with PCM (25 mM) significantly decreases the percentage cell viability to 73.29 ± 4.79, 40.75 ± 0.34, 38.93 ± 0.52, and 14.27 ± 0.4 at concentration of 125, 250, 500, and 1000 μg/ml, respectively, with respect to control cells. Pretreatment with only LPLM with similar concentration significantly protected HepG2 cell death induced by PCM in a dose-dependent manner [Figure 5]. Fraction of LPLM/F3 showed the strongest protective effect of 63.93 ± 0.862 at 1000 μg/ml, whereas the isolated compound showed a significant protective effect of 54.06 ± 1.04 at 1000 μg/ml, as shown in [Table 3]. Standard hepatoprotective marker drug silymarin showed the highest protective effect of 80.94 ± 3.24 at 1000 μg/ml was further confirmed through the cell morphology by phase-contrast microscopic images [Figure 6]. Exposure of HepG2 cells to PCM significantly (P < 0.05) decreased cell viability, whereas exposure of HepG2 cells to an isolated compound in the presence of PCM significantly (P < 0.05) increased cell viability concerning control cells. Hence, it indicated that isolated compounds at a dose of 1000 μg/ml possessed marked hepatoprotective activity. Many studies have suggested the hepatoprotective activity of coumarin compounds because of their strong antioxidant potential. Coumarin has the potency to reduce free radical formations and also leads to scavenging free reactive radicals. Cell damage due to free radicals was effectively reduced by esculetin by its antioxidant property. Moreover, esculetin remarkably reduced the CCl4-induced cell damage in rats, probably by free radical scavenging property.
Figure 5: % cell viability of Launaea pinnatifida extracts, (a) PCM-treated group with various concentrations, (b) Fractions obtained from SSE, (c) Fractions obtained from VLC1, (d) Fractions obtained from VLC2 and isolated compound

Click here to view
Table 3: Percentage cell viability of L. pinnatifida fractions by methylthiazolyldiphenyl-tetrazolium bromide assay

Click here to view
Figure 6: Phase-contrast microscopic analysis: Protective effect of Launaea pinnatifida plant extract on paracetamol-induced damage to HepG2 cell line, (a) Control cells, (b) Cell treated with paracetamol (25 mM), (c) Cell treated with silymarin 250 μg/ml in the presence of paracetamol, (d) Cell treated with LPLPE fraction 250 μg/ml in the presence of paracetamol, (e) Cell treated with Launaea pinnatifida leaf chloroform extract fraction 250 μg/ml in the presence of paracetamol, (f) Cell treated with LPLM fraction 250 μg/ml in the presence of paracetamol, (g) Cell treated with LPLW fraction 250 μg/ml in the presence of paracetamol, (h) Cell treated with isolated compound (250 μg/ml) in the presence of paracetamol

Click here to view



   Conclusion Top


This is the first report on the bioactivity-guided isolation of L. pinnatifida, which shows that the methanolic extract of leaves and esculetin isolated there from possesses marked antioxidant and hepatoprotective activity in a dose-dependent manner. Esculetin may serve as a phytochemical reference marker for the standardization of the plant. Moreover, because of the limited studies on Gojihva species, these qualitative and quantitative studies combined with bioactivity evaluation will shed new light for advanced studies as well as serve as quality control parameters for this plant. The plant could be an alternative source for the development of a new formulation for free radical-mediated degenerative diseases, mainly regarding the liver. The work also broadens the horizon for further phytochemical and pharmacological research on the plant.

Acknowledgements

I would like to express my deep and sincere gratitude to the School of Pharmacy, RK University, Phyto Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd, and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Saurashtra University, for their valuable technical support on this research work. I am extremely grateful to my research supervisor, Dr. Devang Pandya, for providing valuable guidance throughout this research.

Financial support and sponsorship

I would like to acknowledge the financial assistance given by Phyto Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India (Reference No. PLPL/HMNS/1716) for the research-related facilities.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Strnad P, Tacke F, Koch A, Trautwein C. Liver - guardian, modifier and target of sepsis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;14:55-66.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Muriel P, Arauz JJ. Coffee and liver diseases. Fitoterapia 2010;81:297-305.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Setty SR, Quereshi AA, Swamy AV, Patil T, Prakash T, Prabhu K, et al. Hepatoprotective activity of Calotropis procera flowers against paracetamol-induced hepatic injury in rats. Fitoterapia 2007;78:451-4.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Nijveldt RJ, Teerlink T, Siroen MP, van Lambalgen AA, Rauwerda JA, van Leeuwen PA. The liver is an important organ in the metabolism of asymmetrical dimethylarginine (ADMA). Clin Nutr (Edinb). 2003;22:17-22.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
He Q, Luo Y, Zhang P, An C, Zhang A, Li X, et al. Hepatoprotective and antioxidant potential of radish seed aqueous extract on cadmium-induced hepatotoxicity and oxidative stress in mice. Pharmacogn Mag 2019;15:283.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global burden of disease study. Res J Pharm Technol 1997;349:1436-42.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Negi AS, Kumar J, Luqman S, Shanker K, Gupta M, Khanuja SJ. Recent advances in plant hepatoprotectives: A chemical and biological profile of some important leads. Med Res Rev 2008;28:746-72.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Fallah Huseini H, Alavian SM, Heshmat R, Heydari MR, Abolmaali K. The efficacy of Liv-52 on liver cirrhotic patients: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled first approach. Phytomedicine 2005;12:619-24.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
De Silva HA, Thabrew MI, Pathmeswaran A, Fonseka MM, De Silva HJ. Liv. 52 in alcoholic liver disease: A prospective, controlled trial. J Ethnopharmacol 2003;84:47-50.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Vaidya B. Some Controversial Drugs in Indian Medicine. 3rd ed. Varanasi, India: Chaukhambha Orientalia; 2010.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Dhami N, Mishra AD. Phytochemical variation: How to resolve the quality controversies of herbal medicinal products? J Herb Med 2015;5:118-27.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Makwana HT, Pandya DJ. Launaea pinnatifida cass. A species of the controversial drug gojihva: Comprehensive review. Int J Pharmacogn Phytochem 2019;11:240-3.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Thomas V, Nair SV, Ved D, Shankar DJ. Controversial identities of medicinal plants in classical literature of Ayurveda. J Ayurveda Integr Med 2020;11:565-72:  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Salih Y, Harisha CR, Shukla VJ, Acharya R. Pharmacognostical evaluation of Launaea sarmentosa (Willd.) schultz-bip. ex Kuntze root. Ayu 2013;34:90-4.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Khare CP. Indian Medicinal Plants: An Illustrated Dictionary Indian Medicinal Plants. New York, NY: Springer; 2007. p. 364.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Pasayeva L, Üstün O, Demirpolat E, Karatoprak GS, Tugay O, Kosar MJ. Bioactivity-guided isolation of cytotoxic and antioxidant phytochemicals from four Cousinia species from stenocephala bunge section. Pharmacogn Mag 2019;15:682.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Ustun O, Berrin O, Baykal T. Bioactivities of ethanolic extract and its fractions of Cistus laurifolius L. (Cistaceae) and Salvia wiedemannii Boiss. (Lamiaceae) Species. Pharmacogn Mag 2016;12 Suppl 1:82-5.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Erdogdu YJ. Investigations of FT-IR, FT-Raman, FT-NMR spectra and quantum chemical computations of Esculetin molecule. Spectrochim Acta A 2013;106:25-33.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Gyamfi MA, Yonamine M, Aniya YJ. Free-radical scavenging action of medicinal herbs from Ghana: Thonningia sanguinea on experimentally-induced liver injuries. Gen Pharmacol 1999;32:661-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Tumbas-Saponjac V, Akpoveso OO, Oyeniran OI, Desančić J, Četojević-Simin DJ. Antioxidant activity and enhanced cytotoxicity of aqueous Mucuna pruriens L. leaf extract by doxorubicin on different human cancer cell lines. Pharmacogn Mag 2020;16:224.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Karthik V, Suresh P, David DC. In vitro hydrogen peroxide scavenging activity and alpha amylase inhibitory activity of croton tiglium extract. Res J Pharm Technol 2019;12:3045-7.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Jan S, Khan MR, Rashid U, Bokhari JJ. Assessment of antioxidant potential, total phenolics and flavonoids of different solvent fractions of Monotheca buxifolia fruit. Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2013;4:246-54.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Palabiyik SS, Karakus E, Halici Z, Cadirci E, Bayir Y, Ayaz G, et al. The protective effects of carvacrol and thymol against paracetamol-induced toxicity on human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines (HepG2). Hum Exp Toxicol 2016;35:1252-63.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Minamikawa T, Akazawa T, Uritani IJ. Isolation of Esculetin from sweet potato roots with black rot. J Nat 1962;195:726.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Coruh N, Ozdogan NJ. Fluorescent coumarin components of the bark of Aesculus hippocastanum. J Liq Chromatogr R T 2014;37:1334-50.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Guideline IH, editor Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Q2 (R1). Geneva, Switzerland: International Conference on Harmonization; 2005.  Back to cited text no. 26
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
    Results and Disc...
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed210    
    Printed6    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded69    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal