Home | About PM | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact us |  Login 
Pharmacognosy Magazine
Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
 


 
  Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 16  |  Issue : 71  |  Page : 464-470  

Neuroprotective effect of the essential oil of Lavandula officinalis against hydrogen peroxide-induced toxicity in mice


1 Unit of Macromolecular Biochemistry and Genetics, Faculty of Sciences of Gafsa, Sidi Ahmed Zarrouk, Gafsa, Tunisia
2 Center for Studies and Research of Medicinal Plants, Federal University of Vale do São Francisco, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil
3 Unit of Macromolecular Biochemistry and Genetics, Faculty of Sciences of Gafsa, Sidi Ahmed Zarrouk, Gafsa; Laboratory of Environmental Physiopathology, Valorization of Bioactive Molecules and Mathematical Modeling, Faculty of Sciences Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia
4 Laboratory of Environmental Physiopathology, Valorization of Bioactive Molecules and Mathematical Modeling, Faculty of Sciences Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia
5 Laboratory of Plant Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia

Date of Submission11-Dec-2019
Date of Decision21-Jan-2020
Date of Acceptance21-Apr-2020
Date of Web Publication20-Oct-2020

Correspondence Address:
Jackson Roberto Guedes da Silva Almeida
Center for Studies and Research of Medicinal Plants, Federal University of Vale do São Francisco, 56304-205, Petrolina, Pernambuco
Brazil
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/pm.pm_460_19

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Background: Brain is the main organ that manages all other organs and has significant oxygen requirements, which makes it vulnerable to reactive oxygen species, thus causing different neurological disorders. The aim of this work is the evaluation of Lavandula officinalis essential oil neuroprotective effect against hydrogen peroxide (HP)-induced toxicity in mice. Materials and Methods: Essential oil was extracted by hydrodistillation using a Clevenger-type apparatus. Essential oil analysis is performed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Biological activity evaluation carried out the ferric reducing antioxidant power test, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) fragmentation assay, the histopathological study of the brain, and determination of antioxidant enzyme activities. Results: Chemical characterization of essential oil using GC-MS identified 47 compounds, accounting for almost 80% of the total oil and indicates the occurrence of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes. The identified major compounds are pentanone (16.55%), propanal (15.89%), methyl ethyl ketone (13.51%), naphthalene (10.81%), terpinen-4-ol (6.55%), cyclopentanecarboxylic acid (4.77%), and isoborneol (2.27%). This study allowed us to investigate the effects of HP on brain function in Mus musculus adult mice by assessing DNA degradation, cell morphology, oxidative balance and brain weight variation. Furthermore, we have highlighted the beneficial effects of L. officinalis essential oil, which could significantly counteract all these alterations by its active compounds, which are endowed with potent biological activities. Conclusion: We can conclude that HP-induced damage in histomorphological changes in mice brain, significant atrophy, as well as an important alteration of the genetic expression.

Keywords: Brain, DNA, essential oil, Lavandula officinalis, oxidative stress


How to cite this article:
Akermi S, da Silva Almeida JR, Khedher A, Bouzenna H, Dhibi S, Feriania A, Mufti A, Daoud A, Elfeki A, Hfaiedh N. Neuroprotective effect of the essential oil of Lavandula officinalis against hydrogen peroxide-induced toxicity in mice. Phcog Mag 2020;16:464-70

How to cite this URL:
Akermi S, da Silva Almeida JR, Khedher A, Bouzenna H, Dhibi S, Feriania A, Mufti A, Daoud A, Elfeki A, Hfaiedh N. Neuroprotective effect of the essential oil of Lavandula officinalis against hydrogen peroxide-induced toxicity in mice. Phcog Mag [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 30];16:464-70. Available from: http://www.phcog.com/text.asp?2020/16/71/464/298694



SUMMARY

  • Lavandula officinalis essential oil has neuroprotective effect against hydrogen peroxide (HP) induced toxicity in mice
  • Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of essential oil identified 47 compounds, mainly mono and sesquiterpenes as major constituents
  • This study allowed to investigate the effects of HP on brain function in Mus musculus adult mice.




Abbreviations used: CAT: Catalase; DNA: Deoxyribonucleic acid; FeCl3: Ferric chloride; FRAP: Ferric reducing antioxidant power; GABA: Gama-aminobutiric acid; GC-MS: Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; GPx: Glutathione peroxidase; H2O2: Hydrogen peroxide; HP: Hydrogen peroxide; K3Fe(CN)6: Potassium ferricyanide; MDA: Malondialdehyde; NBT: Nitrobluetetrazolium; ROs: Reactive oxygen species; SOD: Superoxide dismutase; TBARS: Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances; TBS: Tris-Buffered-Saline; UI: International units.


   Introduction Top


During the last decades, the increasing use of natural and synthetic substances, thus causing adverse effects on human health, led scientists to seek effective solutions. In particular, peroxidized compounds have attracted a lot of attention because they induce several damages.[1] In this context, the use of hydrogen peroxide (HP) in many areas implies that a lot of people around the world have been receiving higher or lower doses of HP. In fact, HP is used such as oxidizing agent with a wide number of industrial applications, for example in wood pulp, hair, and cosmetics, as a disinfectant and neutralizing agent in wine distillation,[2] in glass bottles cleaning, in the hospital environment (mixture with per acetic acid), in the swimming pool water treatment industry (in replacement of chlorinated products), in the food and juice processing and packaging.[3]

Moreover, peroxidic compounds administered by different routes have been shown to cause adverse effects inducing then certain neuronal damage.[4] It is therefore important to detect the potential toxicity of these substances. The brain plays a vital role in the control and functioning of almost all our organs that are influenced by exogenous agents, and it has become clear that these substances may act directly or indirectly on the neuronal tissue to produce a variety of biological effects of both physiological and pathological significance.[5]

Scientists have proven that despite HP's involvement in many biological processes, repeated and uncontrolled use can be a cause of oxidative stress. This causes consequently, many disorders.[6] Indeed, several antioxidants have been proved efficient in protecting some affection against HP treatment deleterious effect.[7] Many efforts have been made by researchers to implicated strategies to prevent or treat chemical-induced complications, among which we can quote phytotherapy, which is the use of a plant or one of its active ingredients to oppose more or less serious complications.[8]

Lavender (Lavandula officinalis) has proved successful in protecting different organs against oxidative stress in various situations.[9],[10] It is an aromaic plant of the “Lamiaceae” family from the Western Mediterranean basin. It is not only widely used as traditional medicine, but also known to possess important biological properties.[11] The essential oil extracted from the leaves of L. officinalis has been reported to possess antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and hypnotic effects.[12] It has also been demonstrated that the efficiency of this oil is attributed to the active plant components. However, the therapeutic effect of L. officinalis against HP-induced neurotoxicity has not been studied yet.

In this context, the present study was conducted to explore the protective effect of Lavender essential oil on neuronal damage induced by HP in mice.


   Materials and Methods Top


Plant material

L. officinalis leaves were collected from a rural area around Gafsa (34.4311°N, 8.7757°E, Tunisia) in spring. A voucher specimen (n° LO02) was deposited at the herbarium of the Faculty of Sciences of Gafsa, University of Gafsa. The plant material was dried, ground using a blender, and subjected to hydrodistillation.

Extraction of essential oil

Essential oils were extracted by hydrodistillation of dried plant material (50 g of Lavender in 500 ml of distilled water) using a Clevenger-type apparatus for 5 h, as described in the European Pharmacopeia (NIST/EPA/NIH Mass Spectral Library with Search Program: Data Version, NIST 08). We performed repetitions to have enough quantity for our tests. The essential oil was collected, dried under anhydrous sodium sulfate, and stored at 4°C until future use.

Analysis of the essential oils by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

The essential oils were analyzed using an Agilent-Technologies 6890 N Network GC system equipped with a flame ionization detector and HP-5MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm, film thickness 0.25 μm; Agilent-Technologies, Little Falls, CA, USA). The injector and detector temperatures were set at 220 and 290°C, respectively. The column temperature was programmed from 80 to 220°C at a rate of 4°C/min, with the lower and upper temperatures being held for 3 and 10 min, respectively. The flow rate of the carrier gas (Helium) was 1.0 ml/min. A sample of 1.0 μl was injected, using split mode (split ratio, 1:100). Retention index comparison was used to identify the components, relative to n-alkane index and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) spectra from a home-made library, constructed based on the analysis of reference oils, laboratory-synthesized components and commercially available standards.

Ferric reducing antioxidant power test

The reductive power test consists of evaluating the ability of the sample to give an iron-converting electron of Fe3+ form to Fe2+ form, which can be quantified by measuring the blue color formation at 700 nm. Therefore, a high absorbance indicates that the sample has great reducing power. One millilitre of a phosphate buffer solution (0.2 M, pH = 6.6) and 1 ml of 1% potassium ferricyanide [K3 Fe(CN)6] are added to 0.5 ml of the different concentrations of the samples prepared in DMSO. After incubation for 20 min in a water bath at 50°C., 1 ml of a 10% TCA solution is added to the reaction medium. After centrifugation for 10 min at 3000 rpm, 1.5 ml of the water and 100 μl of 0.1% ferric chloride are added to 1.5 ml of the supernatant. The absorbance is determined at 700 nm against a blank containing all the reagents in the absence of the sample tested.

Experimental design of animals

A total of 24 Mus musculus adult female mice, approximately 37 g body weight, obtained from the animal production unit, Sfax, were maintained for a 2-week adaptation period under the same conditions of temperature (22°C ± 2°C), relative humidity (50% ± 4%) and a constant photoperiod (12 h light/dark cycle). Animals were fed pellets (SNA, Sfax, Tunisia). After the adaptation period, the animals were placed in four groups, with six mice in each group. Before starting any type of treatment, we have carried out toxicity tests for the plant as well as the HP treatment was then administered as follows: Group I (C): that received vehicle only (olive oil) and considered as the normal control group.

Group II (Lav): that receivedessential oil of L. officinalis diluted in the olive oil (200 mg/kg body weight).[12]

Group III (HP): that receiveddaily HP dissolved in olive oil at a dose of 774 mg/kg body weight/day.[13]

Group IV (HP + Lav): that receivedessential oil of L. officinalis and, at the same time, treated with the HP.

The treatment was orally (gavage) for four successive weeks. Mice of the 2nd and 4th groups were treated with essential oil of L. officinalis for 14 days before HP administration.

Animals from each group were sacrificed rapidly by decapitation to avoid the effect of stress. The brains were removed, cleaned, and weighed to study the variation of their weights and finally stored at −80°C until use.

Animal ethics statement

The animals were treated in accordance with the Tunisian code of practice for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes as well as the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes (Council of Europe NO123, Strasbourg, 1985).

Deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation assay

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) samples in the brain tissue required for the DNA fragmentation analysis of normal and experimental mice were isolated using the method previously reported.[14] The DNA fragmentation assay was performed by electrophoresing genomic DNA samples on agarose/EtBr gel following the procedure previously described.[15]

Histopathological study of the brain

To study the cellular architecture, we conducted to dip parts of experimental mice's brain for 48 h into a fixative solution (10% formalin neutral buffer solution). First, we wash trimmed tissues with tap water, then dehydrated them through a graded alcohol series and passed them through xylol and paraffin series before embedding them in paraffin. Blocks were cuted into 5–6 μm sections using a microtome, stained in hematoxylin and eosin, and finally examined under the optical microscope.

Determination of antioxidant enzyme activities

Small pieces of the brain (1 g) were immersed in 2 ml ice-cold Tris-Buffered-Saline (pH 7.4) and then centrifuged (5000 ×g, 30 min, 4°C). Supernatants were collected and then used for determining the levels of lipid peroxidation (Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances [TBARS]) and also the variation of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and catalase (CAT) as following:

TBARS: 175 μl of 20% trichloracetic acid containing 1% butyl hydroxytoluene were added to 125 μl of supernatant. Lipid peroxidation was evaluated by measuring the substances which react with thiobarbituric acid (TBARS) containing aldehydes (including malondialdehyde) and lipid hydroperoxides, according to Yagi.[16]

SOD: we have determined the total SOD by measuring its ability to inhibit the photoreduction of nitrobluetetrazolium (NBT), referring to the method of Misra and Fridovich.[17] One unit of SOD represents the amount inhibiting the photoreduction of NBT by 50%. The activity was expressed as units/mg of proteins at 25°C.

GPx: 1 μmol of reduced glutathione peroxide oxided by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (1 min, pH 7.4 at 25°C) corresponds to one unit of GPx according to the method of Flohel and Gunzler.[18]

CAT: we have used the method of Aebi.[19] One millilitre of the reaction mixture contained 100 mM of phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 100 mM H2O2, and 20 μl of the brain (=1.5 mg of protein). We have measured the decrease of absorbance at 240 nm for 1 min that refers to the H2O2 decomposition. We used an extinction coefficient of 0.043/mM/cm to calculate the enzyme coefficient that is expressed in International Units, i.e. in μmoles H2O2 destroyed/min/mg of proteins.

Statistical analyses

Data were expressed as mean, standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA, followed by a Tukey's post hoc test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


   Results Top


The chemical characterization of the essential oil using GC-MS identified 47 compounds, accounting almost 80% of the total oil and indicates the occurrence of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes. The identified major compounds were pentanone (16.55%), propanal (15.89%), methyl ethyl ketone (13.51%), naphthalene (10.81%), terpinen-4-ol (6.55%), cyclopentanecarboxylic acid (4.77%) and isoborneol (2.27%). [Table 1] shows the identified constituents, their retention time, and the corresponding amount.
Table 1: Chemical composition of the essential oil of Lavandula officinalis

Click here to view


The chromatogram, as shown in [Figure 1], illustrates the major compounds found in L. officinalis essential oil.
Figure 1: Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry chromatogram of the essential oil of Lavandula officinalis. Peaks: (1) Camphene (2) β-Myrcene (3) Propanal (4) Geranylbromide (5) Cyclopentane carboxylic acid (6) Methylethylketone (7) Pentenone (8) Naphtalene (9) Isoborneol (10) Isobornylformate (11) Terpinen-4-ol (12) Bornyl acetate (13) Caryophyllen (14) Globulol (15) Cubenol (16) Isoaromadendrene epoxide. The essential oils were analyzed using an Agilent-Technologies 6890 N Network GC system equipped with a flame ionization detector and hydrogen peroxide -5MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm, film thickness 0.25 μm)

Click here to view


As can be clearly seen in [Figure 2], the essential oil of L. officinalis was able to reduce Fe3+ to Fe2+ at different concentrations ranges. The reducing power of this natural product increased with increasing concentrations and was able to serve as an electron donor. The reducing power of Lavender's oil at 3 mg/ml was found to be 0.66 ± 0.15 and thus, significantly lower than that of ascorbic acid, which was used as the positive control (1.27 ± 0.37), at the same concentration.
Figure 2: Reducing power of the essential oil of Lavandula officinalis and the synthetic antioxidant ascorbic acid at different concentrations

Click here to view


[Figure 3] illustrates the significant reduction by 44.44% in brain weight in HP-treated mice compared to control mice as well as in mice receiving lavender oil (42.31%) and in animals pretreated with lavender and then with HP (37.50%).
Figure 3: Variations in brain weights of mice after 6 weeks of treatments in controls (c), (Lav) mice receiving only the essential oil of Lavandula officinalis,(hydrogen peroxide) mice treated with hydrogen peroxide, (Lav + hydrogen peroxide) mice pretreated with Lav then treated with hydrogen peroxide. Values correspond to the mean of 6 measurements ± standard deviation. ** P < 0.05 versus control group; ++: P <0.05 versus HP group

Click here to view


[Figure 4] shows the qualitative changes in the integrity of the genomic DNA extracted from the brain tissues. The gel electrophoresis DNA isolated from control samples (lane 1) and Lav-treated tissues (lane 2) presented intact bands. However, a clear degradation of DNA, characterized by mixed smearing and laddering of the DNA marker of apoptosis were observed in the HP-treated group (lane 3). In the Lav+HP treated groups (lane 4), a less fragmentation nearly the same as controls was observed.
Figure 4: Agarose gel electrophoresis of deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation. Deoxyribonucleic acid isolated from experimental brain tissues was loaded into 0.8% (w/v) agarose gels. Lane 1: Deoxyribonucleic acid isolated from control brain tissue; Lane 2: Deoxyribonucleic acid isolated from Lav treated brain samples. Lane 3: Deoxyribonucleic acid isolated from hydrogen peroxide intoxicated brain; Lane 4: Deoxyribonucleic acid isolated from Lav + HP treated brain samples

Click here to view


In [Figure 5], we illustrate histopathological changes in the brain. The control brain has shown no microscopic lesion. HP hippocampal sections revealed remarkable damage. We notice apoptosis, congestion of blood capillary, nuclei were pyknotic, and there is chromatic condensation, neuronal atrophy, and cellular atypia. The administration of lavender to mice has significantly prevented these lesions.
Figure 5: Histological structures of the brain of mice stained with hematoxylin eosin GX40: controls (C), receiving lavender (Lav), treated with hydrogen peroxide alone (hydrogen peroxide) and in combination with lavender (Lav + HP). 1: Congestion of blood capillary; 2: Chromatin condensation; 3: Apoptotic particles; 4: Neuronal atrophy; 5: Cellular atypia

Click here to view


TBARS concentration is a good marker of cell homeostasis. In our experimental conditions, we find that the lipoperoxidation was increased in the brain after 2 weeks of HP administration (P < 0.05) compared to the control group. A significant decrease was observed in the group pretreated with L. officinalis then receiving HP [Figure 6]. We notice a remarkable decrease in the levels of the antioxidant enzymes that protect cells from oxidative injury. In fact, CAT, SOD, and GPx were found to be reduced by (0.024; 0.119 and 0.110 UI/mg of proteins), respectively, in the tissues of mice treated only by HP compared to normal mice. These changes, which indicate an inability to counter the negative effects of HP, were corrected in mice treated with L. officinalis.
Figure 6: Levels of lipid peroxidation (expressed as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, nmol/mg protein) and activities (international units/mg protein) of catalase, superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase in brain tissues after 6 weeks of treatment in controls (c), (Lav) mice received the essential oil of Lavandula officinalis,(hydrogen peroxide) group given hydrogen peroxide for 2 weeks and (Lav + HP) animals pretreated with lavender then gavaged by hydrogen peroxide. Values are the mean of 6 measurements ± standard deviation.+P < 0.05 compared to hydrogen peroxide group, * P < 0.05 compared to control Group (c), ** P < 0.01 compared to Hydrogen peroxide group, **P < 0.01 compared to control Group (c)

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


There has been a growing appreciation of the important role of oxidative stress in many diseases. The study of HP has, in fact, attracted the attention of many researchers. However, the precise nature by which HP functions as a potent agent in vertebrates has remained unknown. Neurodegenerative diseases are a major worrying situation, inviting specialists to provide effective solutions. One of the most relevant strategies used by researchers to oppose these complications is herbal medicine and more specifically, the use of essential oils. In this context, the present work was undertaken to explore the protective effects of the essential oil of L. officinalis on the HP-induced neuronal toxicity.

In this study, we have evidenced the effects of HP by studying the integrity of the DNA, the histological examination, the variation of the brain weight, and the study of oxidative balance. We have demonstrated that the repeated administration of HP resulted in an alteration of the expression of the DNA, an involvement of hippocampal neurons, a loss of the brain weight as well as an imbalance in the redox system indicating then a massive damage in neural function.

Neurons are, by nature, particularly sensitive to oxidative stress because of their high energy consumption, higher oxygen exposure, metal ion enrichment, higher polyunsaturated fatty acid composition sensitive to oxidation, and finally, their low content in antioxidant molecules. Otherwise, peroxides are known to be able to form oxygen free radicals that are extensively implicated in several biological mechanisms.

HP and its derivatives, particularly reactive oxygen species (ROs) have significant physiological and pathological effects.[20] Proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids are targeted by oxidative reactions and damaged by free radicals.[21]

The redox regulation of the initiation of transcription appeared as an important element of the control of the gene expression.[22] In eukaryotes, a factor of murine transcription, activated by HP, binds to the DNA sequence recognized by OxyR.[23] A large number of eukaryotic transcription factors are sensitive to the redox balance in the cell; its variation really rules the activity of many transcription factors. Their degree of sensitivity is variable. The AP-1 (activator protein 1) complex is composed of a dimer that reacts quickly to various stresses;[24] it is activated in vivo by HP as well as ultraviolet (via ROs). Our findings are in agreement with Lassmann et al.[25] Lucassen[26] who confirm that severe brain diseases contain more cells with DNA damage and more specifically with Shimada et al.[27] who affirm that the DNA damage that occurs during neuronal apoptosis has been evidenced by examination of nuclear DNA strand breaks.

In neurodegenerescence, the antioxidant system can no longer counter the production of free radicals ROs that accumulate in neurons and lead them slowly towards their death, especially by the mechanism of apoptosis. In fact, the alteration of the DNA is confirmed by the histological data obtained. We found significant changes in neuronal sections, such as a decrease in the total number of cells with atrophy of the cell body. The apoptotic cell appears as an isolated form, retracted with eosinophilic cytoplasm with fragments of dense nuclear chromatin. In fact, apoptosis can occur in a wide variety of situations. The death of neurons by apoptosis, common during development, also occurs when the neuron detects an abnormality in its own functioning. It is triggered by abnormalities due to the accumulation of free radicals in the cell, or by an excess of intracellular calcium due to a tear in the membrane.[28] It is an active process requiring activation signals, signal transduction, expression of genes, and protein synthesis. It can be induced or prevented by the addition or suppression of particular stimuli.[29]

We also found that there was a decrease in the relative weights of the brains of mice administered by HP. Atrophy defines a decrease in the size of an organ or tissue; this results in an imbalance between the formation of new cells not compensating apoptosis or programmed cell death. Cerebral atrophy, therefore, represents a decrease in the size of the brain that affects part or all of the brain.

According to our results, this loss of weight confirms the histological data and the genetic profile, thus testifying the induction of a neurodegenerative process. In fact, the mice brain exposed to HP showed a dose-dependent decrease which promotes atrophy of the brain as observed by[30] who demonstrates that brief exposure to HP is sufficient at clinically relevant concentrations to induce substantial neuronal injury involving calcium channels and glutamate receptors. This is also confirmed by the work of Mesiwala et al.[31] who proved that 3% HP particles caused lesions following its diffusion in the human brain. Tissues have different oxygen requirements and are not evenly distributed in the body.

Although the brain accounts for only 2% of the total body weight, it consumes more than 20% of the total required oxygen.[32] Given this high demand with the abundance of highly peroxidizable substrates, the brain is therefore threatened by the deleterious effects of ROs. ROs overproduction or antioxidant systems failure results in an imbalance of cell redox state, which is called oxidative stress. Many studies have highlighted the relationship between oxidative stress and a range of neurodegenerative diseases and new approaches in vivo andin vitro propose its great impact on these diseases.[33] The neuron, as one of the main types of brain cells, is responsible for the massive consumption of oxygen and glucose. In the case of cellular stress, the partially reduced forms of oxygen are very active because the free radical is unstable and seeks to be a donor or to accept an electron. ROS interacts chemically with biological molecules because of their high reactivity resulting in structural and functional changes or even cell death. These species target different substrates, which cause the oxidation of DNA, proteins, and lipid peroxidation. To avoid the accumulation of ROs causing deleterious effects, each cell of the body has enzymatic and non-enzymatic proteins, as well as molecules of food and metabolic origin that eliminate them. SOD is the first barrier to this antioxidant defense. The existence of three different types of this enzyme whose activity and localization in the cell are complementary has been demonstrated; they ensure the elimination of oxidized anions and HP in the intracellular compartments. They catalyze the disproportionation of O2- to HP.[34]

HP and lipid peroxides are reduced by multiple isoenzymes which belong to the family of GPx s using GSH as electron donor.[35] There are three different isoforms of GPx with different locations in the cell, and it should be noted that GPx 1 is one of the major antioxidant enzymes in the brain. It has been suggested that its regulation could be used in the prevention of neuronal damage.[36] CAT, which is located in peroxisomes and cytoplasm, is responsible for converting HP to water and oxygen.[33]

Herbal medicine helps to improve memory or delay various types of neurodegenerations. It is believed that extracts and essential oils from aromatic plants are potent candidates with their active compounds having positive effects on nerve cells.

These compounds exert a protective action against DNA damage, trap free radicals responsible for oxidative stress, protect cell membranes and provide neurotransmission.[37],[38]

In this context, Zali et al.[39] have demonstrated the efficacy of L. officinalis in the treatment of the most important neurodegenerative conditions related to the massive loss of brain weight. Here, this plant was explored for its ameliorative and neuroprotective mechanism. In fact, the phytochemical screening of the essential oil of L. officinalis leaves revealed a complex composition with high levels of terpenic compounds, which is consistent with the work of Benyagoub et al.[40] with the dominance of oxygenated monoterpenes and monoterpenic hydrocarbons. These compounds attribute high pharmacologic activities to the essential oil of L. officinalis.[41],[42] These compounds enter the brain through the blood-brain barrier nonselectively and react with the central nervous system.

The protective mechanism can be explained by its action on the antioxidant balance, calcium channel blocking[43],[44] membrane stability and depolarization, vesicle trafficking, etc., the neuroprotective effects of lavender might also be related to the activities of glutamate, and gama-aminobutiric acid since these two markers are quantitatively the most important exciters and inhibitors of brain neurotransmitters in mammals[45] so that they are actively sensible to the action of lavender's constituents.[46] In addition, Mudher and Lovestone[47] proved that these monoterpenes play an important role in the activation of some protective proteins such as Snca, Hspa, Apoa1, NF-L etc…that trigger mechanisms such as anti-lipid peroxidation and anti-inflammatory effects. Besides, the Nuclear Factor NF was proved to be an important factor in the neuronal caliber that interacts with lavender since it reduces the frequency of cell death by the apoptotic process via the action of Prdx 2 and Hsp5 that were evidenced to be targeted with the major components of L. officinalis. Therefore, our findings showed that the essential oil of L. officinalis exhibited an excellent neuroprotective effect and may be considered as a useful source of cellular defense agents in the brain against HP.


   Conclusion Top


HP induced damage in histomorphological changes in the brain of mice, significant atrophy, as well as an important alteration of the genetic expression. However, the essential oil of L. officinalis offered significant protection against the toxicity of HP by restoring these parameters to normal, that's maybe attributed to its constituents.

Financial support and sponsorship

This research was funded by the Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Tunis, Tunisia, through the Integrated Physiology Laboratory; Macromolecular Biochemistry and Genetics. Faculty of Sciences of Gafsa, Tunisia and Laboratory of Environmental Physiopathology, Valorization of Bioactive Molecules and Mathematical Modeling, Faculty of Sciences, Sfax, Tunisia.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Du L, Chen J, Xing YQ. Eupatilin prevents H2O2-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis in human retinal pigment epithelial cells. Biomed Pharmacother 2017;85:136-40.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Deed T. Wansbrough H. The manufacture of Hydrogen peroxide. Chemicals-E-Hydrogen Peroxide. Du Pont Peroxide Ltd.; 2017. p. 1-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Note relative au peroxyde d'hydrogène en solution aqueuese. DRA-14-141624-06616. 2014. p. 12-4.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Baharnoori M, Lazarou J. A case of acute cerebral gas embolism due to ingestion of hydrogen peroxide. J Neurol 2012;259:381-3.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Leach RM, Rees PJ, Wilmshurst P. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy. BMJ 1998;317:1140-3.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Plafki C, Peters P, Almeling M, Welslau W, Busch R. Complications and side effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Aviat Space Environ Med 2000;71:119-24.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Le Stress Oxydatif A.R.L., Lausanne. 2010 Dr Méd. DanyMercanUnilabs dany.mercan@unilabs.com.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Burns A, O'Brien J; BAP Dementia Consensus group, Auriacombe S, Ballard C, Broich K, et al. Clinical practice with anti-dementia drugs: A consensus statement from British Association for Psychopharmacology. J Psychopharmacol 2006;20:732-55.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Chu CJ, Kemper KJ. Lavender (Lavandula spp.). Longwood Herbal Task Force 2001. p. 32.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Gören AC, Topçu G, Bilsela G, Bilsela M, Aydoǧmus Z, Pezzuto JMZ. Constituents and Biological Activities from Muehlenbeckia hastulata. Naturforsch. 2002; 57c: 797-800.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Alnamer R, Alaoui K, Bouidida EH, Benjouad A, Cherrah Y. Toxicity and psychotropic activity of essentials oils of Rosmarinus officinalis and Lavandula officinalis from Morocco. J Essent Oil Bear PL 2011;15:716-26.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Pont D. An evaluation of the stability and palatability of hydrogen peroxide in water and its potential genotoxicity in bone marrow when administered to mice in drinking water. Haskell Laboratory; 1995. p. 723-94.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Bachiri L, Ibijbijen J, Nassiri L. Phytochemical Study and Antibacterial Activity of Two Indigenous Lavender Species In Morocco: “Lavandula stoechas L. and Lavandula dentata L.”. Eur Sci J 2016;12:30.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Kanno S, Shouji A, Hirata R, Asou K, Ishikawa M. Effects of naringin on cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C)-induced cytotoxicity and apoptosis in P388 cells. Life Sci 2004;75:353-65.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Sellins KS, Cohen JJ. Hyperthermia induces apoptosis in thymocytes. Radiat Res 1991;126:88-95.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Yagi K. A simple fluorometric assay for lipoperoxide in blood plasma. Biochem Med 1976;15:212-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Misra HP, Fridovich I. The role of superoxide anion in the autooxidation of epinephrine and a simple assay of superoxide dismutase. J Biol Chem 1972;247:3170-5.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Flohel L, Gunzler WA. Assays of glutathione peroxidase. Methods Enzymol 1984;105:114-21.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Aebi H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol 1984;105:121-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Chan PH, Yurko M, Fishman RA. Phospholipid degradation and cellular edema induced by free radicals in brain cortical slices. J Neurochem 1982;38:525-31.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Schneider B, Hanrath P, Vogel P, Meinertz T. Improved morphologic characterization of atrial septal aneurysm by transesophageal echocardiography: Relation to cerebrovascular events. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;16:1000-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Demple B, Amábile-Cuevas CF. Redox redux: The control of oxidative stress responses. Cell 1991;67:837-9.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Duh J, Zhu H, Shertzer H, Nebert D, Puga A. The Y-box motif mediates redox-dependant transcriptional activation in mouse cell. J Biol Chem 1995;270:30499-507.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Guyton KZ, Xu Q, Holbrook NJ. Induction of the mammalian stress response gene GADD153 by oxidative stress: Role of AP-1 element. Biochem J 1996;314(Pt 2):547-54.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Lassmann H, Bancher C, Breitschopf H, Wegiel J, Bobinski M, Jellinger K, et al. Cell death in Alzheimer's disease evaluated by DNA fragmentation in situ. Acta Neuropathol 1995;89:35-41.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Lucassen PJ, Chung WC, Kamphorst W, Swaab DF. DNA damage distribution in the human brain as shown by in situ end labeling; area-specific differences in aging and Alzheimer disease in the absence of apoptotic morphology. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1997;56:887-900.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Shimada A, Keino H, Satoh M, Kishikawa M, Seriu N, Hosokawa M. Age-related progressive neuronal DNA damage associated with cerebral degeneration in a mouse model of accelerated senescence. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2002;57:B415-21.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
RRaff MC, Barres BA, Brune IF, Coles HS, Yishizaki Y, Jacobson MD. Programmed cell death and the control of cell survival: lessons from the nervous system. Science. 1993;262:695-700.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Elemental damage to cells, tissues and organs. French College Patholgists. 2011. Available from: Campus.cerimes.fr. [Last accessed on 28 November 2019].  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Coombes E, Jiang J, Chu XP, Inoue K, Seeds J, Branigan D, et al. Pathophysiologically relevant levels of hydrogen peroxide induce glutamate-independent neurodegeneration that involves activation of transient receptor potential melastatin 7 channels. Antioxid Redox Signal 2011;14:1815-27.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Mesiwala AH, Farrell L, Santiago P, Ghatan S, Silbergeld DL. The effects of hydrogen peroxide on brain and brain tumors. Surg Neurol 2003;59:398-407.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Halliwell B. Oxidative stress and neurodegeneration: Where are we now? J Neurochem 2006;97:1634-58.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Gandhi S, Abramov AY. Mechanism of oxidative stress in neurodegeneration. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2012;2012:428010.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Fridovich I. Superoxide anion radical (O2-.), superoxide dismutases, and related matters. J Biol Chem 1997;272:18515-7.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Oelze M, Kröller-Schön S, Steven S, Lubos E, Doppler C, Hausding M, et al. Glutathione peroxidase-1 deficiency potentiates dysregulatory modifications of endothelial nitric oxide synthase and vascular dysfunction in aging. Hypertension 2014;63:390-6.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Parks JK, Smith TS, Trimmer PA, Bennet JP, Parker D. Neurotoxic Aβ peptides increase oxidative stress in vivo through NMDA-receptor and nitric-oxide synthase mechanisms, and inhibit complex IV activity and induce a mitochondrial permeability transition in vitro. J Neurochem 2001;4:1050-6.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
DeKosky ST, Williamson JD, Fitzpatrick AL, Kronmal RA, Ives DG, Saxton JA, et al. Ginkgo biloba for prevention of dementia a randomized controlled trial; for the Ginkgo Evaluation of Memory (GEM). JAMA 2008;300:2253-62.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Razzaghi-Asl N, Garrido J, Khazraei H, Borges F, Firuzi O. Antioxidant properties of hydroxycinnamic acids: A review of structure- activity relationships. Curr Med Chem 2013;20:4436-50.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Zali H, Zamanian M, Azodi M, Tavirani R, Akbarzadeh A. Protein drug targets of Lavandula angustifolia on treatment of rat Alzheimers disease. IJPR 2015;14:291-302.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Benyagoub E, Nabbou N, Sirat M, Dahlis Z. Antibacterial properties and phytochemical constituents of lavender extracts from the Tlemcen region and their effects on some bacterial species responsible for food infections. RBRS 2014;4:18.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Kashani MS, Tavirani MR, Talaei SA, Salami M. Aqueous extract of lavender (Lavandula angustifolia) improves the spatial performance of a rat model of Alzheimer's disease. Neurosci Bull 2011;27:99-106.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Gilani AH, Aziz N, Khan MA, Shaheen F, Jabeen Q, Siddiqui BS, Herzig JW. Ethnopharmacological evaluation of the anticonvulsant, sedative and antispasmodic activities of Lavandula stoechas. LJ Ethnopharmacol 2000;71:161-7.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Zheng W, Wang SY. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in selected herbs. J Agric Food Chem 2001;49:5165-70.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Hohmann J, Zupkó I, Rédei D, Csányi M, Falkay G, Máthé I, et al. Protective effects of the aerial parts of Salvia officinalis, Melissa officinalis and Lavandula angustifolia and their constituents against enzyme-dependent and enzyme-independent lipid peroxidation. Planta Med 1999;65:576-8.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Rang HP, Dale MM, Ritter JM, Moore PK. Pharmacology. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2007.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Videira R, Castanheira P, Grãos M, Salgueiro L, Faro C, Cavaleiro CA. Necrodane monoterpenoid from Lavandula luisieri essential oil as a cell-permeable inhibitor of BACE-1, the β-secretase in Alzheimer's disease. Flavour Frag J 2013;28:380-8.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Mudher A, Lovestone S. Alzheimer's disease, do tauists and baptists finally shade hand?). Trends Neurosci 2002;25:22-6.  Back to cited text no. 47
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed471    
    Printed18    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded120    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal