|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 56 | Page : 338-343
Efficient preparation of narcissin from Opuntia ficus-indica fruits by combination of response surface methodology and high-speed countercurrent chromatography
Guijae Yoo1, Youngse Oh1, Heejung Yang2, Tae Bum Kim3, Sang Hyun Sung3, Seung Hyun Kim1
1 College of Pharmacy, Yonsei Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Yonsei University, Incheon, Korea
2 College of Pharmacy, Kangwon National University, Chunchon, Korea
3 College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
|Date of Submission||12-Sep-2017|
|Date of Acceptance||19-Oct-2017|
|Date of Web Publication||14-Aug-2018|
Seung Hyun Kim
College of Pharmacy, Yonsei University, 162-1, Songdo-Dong, Yeonsu-Gu, Incheon - 406 840
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background: Narcissin is well known for their various biological activities. Objective: To recover narcissin from the Opuntia ficus-indica fruits (OFIF), an efficient method was developed by a combination of response surface methodology (RSM) and high-speed countercurrent chromatography (HSCCC). Materials and Methods: Optimization of extraction conditions of narcissin from OFIF was determined using RSM with three-level-three-factor Box-Behnken design (BBD). Then, a rapid and efficient method for the isolation of narcissin from the rich narcissin extracts was developed using HSCCC. Results: Regression analysis showed a good fit of the experimental data and the optimal condition was obtained as extraction time (X1), 6.02 h; solvent to material ratio (X2), 8.16 mL/g; and ethanol concentration (X3), 93.48%. Then, the rich narcissin extracts were separated by HSCCC with a two-phase solvent system composed of n-hexane: ethyl acetate: methanol: water (1.5:5:5:1.5, v/v/v/v) in one step within 60 min. As a result, 12 mg of narcissin was isolated from 100 mg of crude extract with purities of 98.5%, as determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Conclusion: This study can be useful to the development of industrial extraction processes, including further studies concerning the optimal number of sequential steps to enhance the efficacy of a large-scale extraction system.
Abbreviations used: BBD: Box-Behnken design; HPLC: High-performance liquid chromatography; HSCCC: High-speed countercurrent chromatography; OFIF: Opuntia ficus-indica fruits; RSM: Response surface methodology
Keywords: Box-Behnken design, high-speed countercurrent chromatography, Opuntia ficus-indica, narcissin, response surface methodology
|How to cite this article:|
Yoo G, Oh Y, Yang H, Kim TB, Sung SH, Kim SH. Efficient preparation of narcissin from Opuntia ficus-indica fruits by combination of response surface methodology and high-speed countercurrent chromatography. Phcog Mag 2018;14:338-43
|How to cite this URL:|
Yoo G, Oh Y, Yang H, Kim TB, Sung SH, Kim SH. Efficient preparation of narcissin from Opuntia ficus-indica fruits by combination of response surface methodology and high-speed countercurrent chromatography. Phcog Mag [serial online] 2018 [cited 2021 Mar 2];14:338-43. Available from: http://www.phcog.com/text.asp?2018/14/56/338/238886
- The optimum conditions for the extraction of narcissin from Opuntia ficus-indica fruits were determined using response surface methodology
- Box-Behnken design was utilized to evaluate the effects of three-independent variables
- Rapid and efficient method for the isolation of narcissin from the rich narcissin extracts was developed using high-speed countercurrent chromatography.
| Introduction|| |
Opuntia ficus-indica var. saboten Makino commonly called prickly pear, tuna, or nopal cactus, belongs to the dicotyledonous angiosperm Cactacea e family, a family that includes about 1500 species of cactus. They are distributed throughout most of the warm weather parts of America, Africa, Southern Europe, and Asia. Among the Opuntia species, O. ficus-indica is found on Jeju Island in Korea, which is widely cultivated for use in food additives and supplements such as juice, jam, and tea. Its fruits and stems have been traditionally used as oriental folk medicine for edema, burns, wounds, bronchial asthma, indigestion, and diabetes. It also has been reported to have biological activities such as reduction of gastric damage, antitumoral, anti-inflammatory, and anti-allergic effects.,,,,,,,
Previous studies on the chemical constituents of the O. ficus-indica fruits (OFIF) revealed the presence of alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, polysaccharides, and organic acids.,, Among the constituents, flavonoid such as narcissin was known as the most characteristic constituent of OFIF. Narcissin, as a kind of the major compositions in OFIF, is well known for their various biological activities, such as hepatoprotective activities, α-glucosidase inhibitory activities, antioxidative activities, and apoptosis-inducing activities against human myelogenous erythroleukemia cells.,,, Due to these pharmacological effects, it is necessary to establish an efficient method for separation of narcissin from this plant.
To recover bioactive compounds from plant raw materials, extraction is widely used and constitutes the first important step for natural product researches. The optimum conditions for extraction of narcissin from the OFIF were determined using response surface methodology (RSM). RSM is effective statistical technique for optimizing the extraction process variables, thereby deduce optimal conditions for certain process.,,
Then, a rapid and efficient method for the separation and purification of narcissin from the rich narcissin extracts was developed using high-speed countercurrent chromatography (HSCCC). HSCCC is a liquid—liquid separation technique, where the mobile phase flows over the stationary phase that is retained within a spinning coil., HSCCC does not need any solid-phase support, so loss of sample due to irreversible adsorption to solid absorbents can be prevented. Moreover, it is rapid and more reproducible than conventional column chromatography. In addition, advantages such as higher loading capacities and ease of scaling up have been well documented.,
In this study, efficient method was developed for preparation of narcissin from OFIF by combination of RSM and HSCCC and separated narcissin was identified through quadrupole-time of flight liquid chromatography/mass (Q-TOF LC/MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra.
| Materials and Methods|| |
The OFIF were collected from Jeju Island (Republic of Korea) and the certificate of identity and quality is also provided. A voucher specimen (YIPS-OP-161114) was deposited at the Herbarium of College of Pharmacy, Yonsei Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Yonsei University, Incheon, Korea.
Reagents and apparatus
All organic solvents, such as hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate, ethanol, methanol, and n-butanol used for extraction and column chromatography were of analytical grade and purchased from Duksan Chemical (Anseong, Korea). HSCCC was carried out with a model TBE-300A (Shenzhen, Tauto Biotech, China). Thin-layer chromatography was performed on a precoated silica gel 60 F254(0.25 mm, Merck, USA). High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was carried out using an Agilent 1260 HPLC system. ESI-MS spectra were obtained using an Agilent 6550 iFunnel Q-TOF LC/MS system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA). 1H NMR (400 MHz) and 13C NMR (100 MHz) spectra were recorded on an Agilent 400-MR NMR spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) and TMS was used as an internal standard. Data processing was carried out with the MestReNova 6.0.2 program. All other chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade.
Preparation of Opuntia ficus-indica fruits
The OFIF were finely chopped. The pulp was separated from the seeds and crushed in a grinding mill. The obtained mash was filtered and then sterilized at 65°C for 30 min. The extracted juice was mixed with dextrin at a ratio of 7:1 and freeze-dried.
An optimization of extraction conditions for the extraction of narcissin from the OFIF was conducted using RSM. For RSM, the levels of independent variables for the extraction of narcissin were selected based on the results obtained from our preliminary experiments. Briefly, 15 experimental runs were conducted with three independent variables and three levels were developed according to the Box-Behnken design (BBD) as shown in [Table 1]. The BBD was used for designing the experiments to evaluate the nonlinear relationship between response values and factors. It has the advantage of being able to reduce the number of combinations compared with the other designs. The independent variables were extraction time (X1, h), solvent-to-material ratio (X2, mL/g), and ethanol concentration (X3, %), while the response variable was the yield of narcissin from OFIF. The generalized second-order polynomial model used in the response surface analysis was as following equation,
|Table 1: Experimental design and responses of the dependent variables to extraction conditions|
Click here to view
where β0 is the intercept; βi, βii, and βij are the linear, quadratic, and interaction terms, respectively, and Xi and Xj are the independent variables. The three-dimensional surface response plots were generated showing the relationship between the response and independent variables.
The Design Expert software (Version 9.0, Minneapolis, USA) was used to conduct the statistical analysis. Results for the yield of narcissin were expressed as means ± standard deviations. A response surface analysis and an analysis of variance (ANOVA) were employed to determine the regression coefficients, statistical significance of the model terms, and to fit the mathematical models of the experimental data that aimed to optimize the overall region for response variables.
Selection of high-speed countercurrent chromatography solvent system
The partition coefficient (K) of the target compound is critical for the isolation by HSCCC. A small amount of the rich narcissin extracts was added to a test vial, to which 3 mL of preequilibrated two-phase solvent system was added. The test vial was shaken vigorously to equilibrate the sample between two phases thoroughly. The upper and lower phases were separated and evaporated under N2 gas, respectively. Dried residues of each phase were dissolved in methanol of 1 mL and analyzed by HPLC. The K value was obtained by the ratio of peak area upper and lower phase.
Preparation of two-phase solvent system and sample solutions
Based on the partition coefficient (K) value, a two-phase solvent system composed of n-hexane: ethyl acetate: methanol: water (1.5:5:5:1.5, v/v/v/v) was selected for the HSCCC separation. The upper and lower were separated, and then degassed by sonication for 30 min before use. The sample solution was prepared by dissolving 100 mg of the rich narcissin extracts in 10 mL mobile phase and then filtered through a 0.2 μm membrane.
High-speed countercurrent chromatography separation procedure
The multilayer coil column was first entirely filled with the upper phase as stationary phase, then the lower phase as mobile phase was pumped into the column at the flow rate of 3 mL/min in the head-to-tail elution mode; the column was rotated at 800 rpm. Once the mobile phase front emerged and the hydrodynamic equilibrium was established within the column, the sample solution was injected; effluent was continuously monitored with a UV detector at 254 nm.
Identification of high-speed countercurrent chromatography peak fractions
The peak fractions from the HSCCC separation were analyzed by HPLC. The analysis was performed with a Shiseido C18 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) at column temperature of 30°C. The gradient elution system consisted of solvent A (acetonitrile) and solvent B (0.1% formic acid). The gradient elution was performed as follows: 0—10 min, 0%—12% A; 10—20 min, 12%—20% A; 20—30 min, 20% A; 30—35 min, 20%—40% A; 35—40 min, 40%—90% A; 40—42 min, 90%—100% A; 42—45 min, 100% A. The sample injection volume was 10 μL. The detection wavelength was 254 nm and the flow rate was 1 mL/min. All solvents were filtered through a 0.2 μm membrane before use. The HSCCC peak fractions were further identified by Q-TOF LC/MS [Figure 1]d, NMR and literature searches.
|Figure 1: (a) High-speed countercurrent chromatography chromatogram of the rich narcissin extracts from Opuntia ficus-indica fruits, (b) High-performance liquid chromatography chromatogram of the rich narcissin extracts from Opuntia ficus-indica fruits (c) High-performance liquid chromatography chromatogram of narcissin isolated from Opuntia ficus-indica fruits by High-speed countercurrent chromatography, and (d) mass spectrum and chemical structure of narcissin isolated from Opuntia ficus-indica fruits|
Click here to view
| Results and Discussion|| |
Optimization of the extraction condition was performed by BBD. According to the BBD design, 15 experiments were performed. Extraction time (hr, X1), solvent-to-material ratio (mL/g, X2), and ethanol concentration (%, X3) were chosen as three variables, which could potentially affect contents of narcissin. As shown in [Table 1], the narcissin contents were varied notably depending on extraction condition. ANOVA was statistically significant (P < 0.05) and suggested that at least one of the parameters of the model can explain the experimental variation of narcissin contents. Correlation coefficient, adjusted correlation coefficient, and lack-of-fit values for both dependent variables are shown in [Table 2]. The results suggested that the model fitted well for the experimental data.
Effect of extraction parameters on the yield of narcissin
The mathematical expression for the relationship of narcissin contents with variables X1, X2, and X3 is given in an equation as follows.
In the models [Table 3], the linear term of extraction time (X1) had the most significant effect (P < 0.01) on narcissin contents. The linear term of solvent-to-material ratio (X2) also showed a significant effect (P < 0.05). However, other linear variable X3; interaction terms of variables X1 X2, X1 X3, and X2 X3; and quadratic terms of X12, X22 and X32 were shown not to be significant. [Table 2] shows the ANOVA of the fitted quadratic polynomial model for narcissin contents. The fitness of the predicted model for narcissin contents was supported by a F = 5.31 and a P = 0.04. The value of coefficient determination (R2) of the predicted model in this response was 0.9053, which suggested the high degree of correlation between observed and predicted value. In addition, P value for lack of fit was 0.386 which is insignificant relative to the pure errors. In general, lack-of-fit test for the model describes the variation in the data around the fitted model. If the model does not fit the data well, the value of lack of fit will come out to be statistically significant, and when investigation proceeded with the model, the optimization of the fitted response surface is likely to give misleading results. In this study, statistical analysis supported the good fit of experimental values and the predicted ones and availability of this polynomial model for further optimization. To visualize the relationship between the response and experimental levels of the independent variables for the narcissin contents, three-dimensional surface plots were constructed according to the quadratic polynomial model equations [Figure 2]. As shown in [Figure 2]a, when ethanol concentration (%) was fixed at the center point (75%), narcissin contents decreased as the extraction time increased from 14 h to 24 h and reached the maximum value when ethanol concentration was elevated from 5.5 mL/g to 10 mL/g. [Figure 2]b shows the effect of the interaction of extraction time and ethanol concentration on the narcissin contents at a fixed solvent to material ratio of 7 mL/g. Narcissin contents increased when ethanol concentration increased from 60% to 100%; however, the narcissin contents decreased when extraction time exceeded 9 h. As shown in [Figure 2]c, when extraction time was fixed at the center point (14 h), narcissin contents increased as the solvent-to-material ratio increased from 5.5 mL/g to 10 mL/g and reached the maximum value when ethanol concentration increased from 60% to 100%.
|Table 3: Regression coefficients and their significances in the second-order polynomial regression equations for narcissin content|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Three-dimensional response surface graph and contour plots for the effects of extraction conditions for narcissin from Opuntia ficus-indica fruits: (a) extraction time and solvent-to-material ratio, (b) extraction time and ethanol concentration, and (c) solvent-to-material ratio and ethanol concentration|
Click here to view
Experimental validation of the optimum conditions
The predicted maximum contents and experimental contents of narcissin were presented in [Table 4]. To ensure that the predicted model was similar to the practical value, further trials were carried out under following modified optimal conditions: the extraction time of 6 h, solvent-to-material ratio of 8 mL/g, and ethanol concentration of 90%. A mean value of 0.55 ± 0.3 mg was gained from the actual experiment, which was found to be significantly in agreement with predicted value (P > 0.05). Hence, the RSM could be applied effectively to the prediction of narcissin extraction from OFIF.
|Table 4: Predicted and experimental values of the response variables under the optimum conditions|
Click here to view
Selection of high-speed countercurrent chromatography solvent system
The selection of the two-phase solvent system is one of the most important steps in performing HSCCC. Suitable two-phase solvent system provides an optimum range of partition coefficient (0.5 ≤ K ≤ 2.0) for the targeted compounds. In general, small K values (<0.5) always result in a poor peak resolution, while large K values (>2) lead to excessive sample band broadening as well as a long separation procedure. Several two-phase solvent systems were tested; their K values are listed in [Table 5]. Based on K value, a two-phase solvent system composed of n-hexane: ethyl acetate: methanol: water (1.5:5:5:1.5, v/v) was selected for the HSCCC separation.
|Table 5: The K values (partition coefficient) of narcissin in different solvents systems|
Click here to view
High-speed countercurrent chromatography separation
Narcissin was successfully separated by HSCCC [Figure 1]a and [Figure 1]b. The purity of isolated narcissin was >95% as evaluated by HPLC-UV at 254 nm [Figure 1]c. The structure was confirmed by ESI-MS, 1H, and 13C NMR spectra by comparing previous literature [Figure 1]d.,
| Conclusion|| |
Narcissin is well known for their various biological activities. To recover narcissin from OFIF, an efficient method was developed by combination of RSM and HSCCC. First, optimization of extraction conditions was studied by the RSM to enrich narcissin extracts. The results indicated that the optimal extraction condition was extraction time, 6.02 h; solvent-to-material ratio, 8.16 mL/g; and ethanol concentration, 93.48%. Then, a rapid and efficient method for the isolation of narcissin from the rich narcissin extracts was developed using HSCCC. The two-phase solvent system used for HSCCC separation was composed of n-hexane-ethyl acetate-methanol-water (1.5:5:5:1.5, v/v/v/v). The isolation was accomplished within 60 min and the purity of narcissin was over 98%.
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korea government (No. 2016R1A2B4006742) and by BrainKorea21PLUS program funded by National Research Foundation of Korea.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Feugang JM, Konarski P, Zou D, Stintzing FC, Zou C. Nutritional and medicinal use of cactus pear (Opuntia spp
.) cladodes and fruits. Front Biosci 2006;11:2574-89.
Butterweck V, Semlin L, Feistel B, Pischel I, Bauer K, Verspohl EJ, et al.
Comparative evaluation of two different opuntia ficus-indica extracts for blood sugar lowering effects in rats. Phytother Res 2011;25:370-5.
Ahn D. Illustrated Book of Korean Medicinal Herbs. Seoul: Kyohaksa; 1998. p. 497.
Alimi H, Hfaiedh N, Bouoni Z, Hfaiedh M, Sakly M, Zourgui L, et al.
Antioxidant and antiulcerogenic activities of Opuntia ficus indica f
. Inermis root extract in rats. Phytomedicine 2010;17:1120-6.
Vázquez-Ramírez R, Olguín-Martínez M, Kubli-Garfias C, Hernández-Muñoz R. Reversing gastric mucosal alterations during ethanol-induced chronic gastritis in rats by oral administration of Opuntia ficus-indica
mucilage. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:4318-24.
Kim SH, Jeon BJ, Kim DH, Kim TI, Lee HK, Han DS, et al.
Prickly pear cactus (Opuntia ficus indica
var. Saboten) protects against stress-induced acute gastric lesions in rats. J Med Food 2012;15:968-73.
Lim KT. Inhibitory effect of glycoprotein isolated from opuntia ficus-indica var. Saboten MAKINO on activities of allergy-mediators in compound 48/80-stimulated mast cells. Cell Immunol 2010;264:78-85.
Zou DM, Brewer M, Garcia F, Feugang JM, Wang J, Zang R, et al.
Cactus pear: A natural product in cancer chemoprevention. Nutr J 2005;4:25.
Budinsky A, Wolfram R, Oguogho A, Efthimiou Y, Stamatopoulos Y, Sinzinger H, et al.
Regular ingestion of opuntia robusta lowers oxidation injury. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 2001;65:45-50.
Park EH, Kahng JH, Lee SH, Shin KH. An anti-inflammatory principle from cactus. Fitoterapia 2001;72:288-90.
Summers WK, Martin RL, Cunningham M, DeBoynton VL, Marsh GM. Complex antioxidant blend improves memory in community-dwelling seniors. J Alzheimers Dis 2010;19:429-39.
Lee EH, Kim HJ, Song YS, Jin C, Lee KT, Cho J, et al.
Constituents of the stems and fruits of Opuntia ficus-indica
var. Saboten. Arch Pharm Res 2003;26:1018-23.
Alarcon-Aguilar FJ, Valdes-Arzate A, Xolalpa-Molina S, Banderas-Dorantes T, Jimenez-Estrada M, Hernandez-Galicia E, et al.
Hypoglycemic activity of two polysaccharides isolated from Opuntia ficus-indica
and O. Streptacantha. Proc West Pharmacol Soc 2003;46:139-42.
Saleem M, Kim HJ, Han CK, Jin C, Lee YS. Secondary metabolites from Opuntia ficus-indica
var. Saboten. Phytochemistry 2006;67:1390-4.
Cejudo-Bastante MJ, Chaalal M, Louaileche H, Parrado J, Heredia FJ. Betalain profile, phenolic content, and color characterization of different parts and varieties of Opuntia ficus-indica
. J Agric Food Chem 2014;62:8491-9.
Pham AT, Malterud KE, Paulsen BS, Diallo D, Wangensteen H. A-glucosidase inhibition, 15-lipoxygenase inhibition, and brine shrimp toxicity of extracts and isolated compounds from Terminalia macroptera
leaves. Pharm Biol 2014;52:1166-9.
Gevrenova R, Kondeva-Burdina M, Denkov N, Zheleva-Dimitrova D. Flavonoid profiles of three bupleurum species and in vitro
hepatoprotective of activity bupleurum flavum forsk. Pharmacogn Mag 2015;11:14-23.
Su BN, Pawlus AD, Jung HA, Keller WJ, McLaughlin JL, Kinghorn AD, et al.
Chemical constituents of the fruits of Morinda citrifolia
(Noni) and their antioxidant activity. J Nat Prod 2005;68:592-5.
Boubaker J, Bhouri W, Ben Sghaier M, Ghedira K, Dijoux Franca MG, Chekir-Ghedira L, et al.
Ethyl acetate extract and its major constituent, isorhamnetin 3-O-rutinoside, from Nitraria retusa
leaves, promote apoptosis of human myelogenous erythroleukaemia cells. Cell Prolif 2011;44:453-61.
Mahugo Santana C, Sosa Ferrera Z, Esther Torres Padrón M, Juan Santana Rodríguez J. Methodologies for the extraction of phenolic compounds from environmental samples: New approaches. Molecules 2009;14:298-320.
Youssef EH, Nicolas L, Catherine N, Richard GM. Low cost process for phenolic compounds extraction from cabernet sauvignon grapes (Vitis vinifera L.
cv. Cabernet sauvignon
). Optimization by response surface methodology. J Nutr Food Sci 2012;31:89-103.
Zhao LC, Liang J, Li W, Cheng KM, Xia X, Deng X, et al.
The use of response surface methodology to optimize the ultrasound-assisted extraction of five anthraquinones from Rheum palmatum L
. Molecules 2011;16:5928-37.
Liyana-Pathirana C, Shahidi F. Optimization of extraction of phenolic compounds from wheat using response surface methodology. Food chem 2005;931:47-56.
Conway WD. Counter-current chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1991;5381:27-35.
Ito Y. Origin and evolution of the coil planet centrifuge: A personal reflection of my 40 years of CCC research and development. Sep Purif Rev 2005;342:131-54.
Sutherland IA. Recent progress on the industrial scale-up of counter-current chromatography. J Chromatogr A 2007;1151:6-13.
Sutherland I, Hawes D, Ignatova S, Janaway L, Wood P. Review of progress toward the industrial scale-up of CCC. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol 2005;2812:1877-91.
Bayat Y, Ebrahimi H, Fotouhi-Far F. Optimization of reductive debenzylation of hexabenzylhexaazaisowurtzitane (the key step for synthesis of HNIW) using response surface methodology. Org Process Res Dev 2012;1611:1733-8.
Bhuyan DJ, Van Vuong Q, Chalmers AC, van Altena IA, Bowyer MC, Scarlett CJ. Microwave-assisted extraction of Eucalyptus robusta
leaf for the optimal yield of total phenolic compounds. Ind Crops Prod 2015;691:290-9.
Baş D, Boyacı İH. Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology. J Food Eng 2007;783:836-45.
Umesh Kumar PK, Chand K. Application of response surface method as an experimental design to optimize clarification process parameters for sugarcane juice. J Food Process Technol 2015;62:422-8.
Wu J, Ge F, Wang D, Xu X. Combination of supercritical fluid extraction with high-speed countercurrent chromatography for extraction and isolation of ethyl p-methoxycinnamate and ethyl cinnamate from Kaempferia galanga L
. Sep Sci Technol 2016;5110:1757-64.
Olennikov DN, Tankhaeva LM, Partilkhaev VV, Rokhin AV. Chemical constituents of Caragana
bungei shoots. Rev Bras Farmacogn 2012;223:490-6.
El-Aasr M, Kabbash A, El-Seoud KA, Al-Madboly A, Ikeda T. Antimicrobial and immunomodulatory activities of flavonol glycosides isolated from Atriplex halimus
l. Herb J Pharm Sci Res 2016;810:1159-68.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]