|Year : 2017 | Volume
| Issue : 51 | Page : 472-476
Hepatoprotective flavonoids in Opuntia ficus-indica fruits by reducing oxidative stress in primary rat hepatocytes
Jung Wha Kim1, Tae Bum Kim1, Hyun Woo Kim1, Sang Wook Park2, Hong Pyo Kim3, Sang Hyun Sung1
1 Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2 Department of Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
3 Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Ajou University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
|Date of Submission||09-May-2016|
|Date of Acceptance||11-Jul-2016|
|Date of Web Publication||19-Jul-2017|
Sang Hyun Sung
Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826
Republic of Korea
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background: Liver disorder was associated with alcohol consumption caused by hepatic cellular damages. Opuntia ficus-indica fruit extracts (OFIEs), which contain betalain pigments and polyphenols including flavonoids, have been introduced as reducing hangover symptoms and liver protective activity. Objective: To evaluate hepatoprotective activity of OFIEs and isolated compounds by high-speed countercurrent chromatography (HSCCC). Materials and Methods: The extract of O. ficus-indica fruits was fractionated into methylene chloride and n-butanol. The n-butanol fraction was isolated by HSCCC separation (methylene chloride-methanol-n-butanol-water, 5:4:3:5, v/v/v/v). The hepatoprotective activity of OFIEs and isolated compounds was evaluated on rat primary hepatocytes against ethanol-induced toxicity. Antioxidative parameters such as glutathione reductase and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) enzymes and the GSH content were measured. Results: Two flavonoids, quercetin 3-O-methyl ester (1) and (+)-taxifolin, and two flavonoid glycosides, isorhamnetin 3-O-β-d-glucoside (3) and narcissin (4), were isolated from the n-butanol fraction by HSCCC separation. Among them, compound 2 significantly protected rat primary hepatocytes against ethanol exposure by preserving antioxidative properties of GR and GSH-Px. Conclusions: OFIEs and (+)-taxifolin were suggested to reduce hepatic damage by alcoholic oxidative stress.
Keywords: (+)-Taxifolin, alcoholic oxidative damage, high-speed countercurrent chromatography, Opuntia ficus-indica, rat primary hepatocytes
|How to cite this article:|
Kim JW, Kim TB, Kim HW, Park SW, Kim HP, Sung SH. Hepatoprotective flavonoids in Opuntia ficus-indica fruits by reducing oxidative stress in primary rat hepatocytes. Phcog Mag 2017;13:472-6
|How to cite this URL:|
Kim JW, Kim TB, Kim HW, Park SW, Kim HP, Sung SH. Hepatoprotective flavonoids in Opuntia ficus-indica fruits by reducing oxidative stress in primary rat hepatocytes. Phcog Mag [serial online] 2017 [cited 2021 Jan 18];13:472-6. Available from: http://www.phcog.com/text.asp?2017/13/51/472/211022
Jung Wha Kim, Tae Bum Kim
These two authors have contributed equally to this work.
- Hepatoprotective Flavonoids were isolated from Opuntia ficus-indica by high -speed countercurrent chromatography (HSCCC).
| Introduction|| |
Threatening cases of liver disorder such as fatty liver, fibrosis, and cirrhosis were associated by alcohol consumption. In spite of world-wide need for liver-protective agent against ethanol, medicines to satisfy our expectation have not yet existed. Accordingly, various natural products have been attempted to search hepatoprotective activities. Opuntia ficus-indica (Cactaceae) is found on Jeju Island in Korea, which is widely cultivated for the use in food additives and supplements such as juice and cookie. Its traditional uses have been known, which are hypertension, asthma, burns, edema, and indigestion. It has also been reported its biological activities such as hypoglycemic effect, reduction of gastric damage, anti-allergic effect, and enhancement of long-term memory.,,,,, With these activities, O. ficus-indica extracts (OFIEs) were introduced as reducing hangover symptoms, apparently by inhibiting the production of inflammatory mediators. Animal experiments also supported its liver protective activity.,,, In the context of its phytochemical composition, the reddish fruit is rich source of natural pigments, betalains. With betacyanin compounds, various flavonoids and megastigmane glycosides from this plant also previously have been reported., There are already ample reports on the separation of various natural products; however, we first focused on the isolation of hepatoprotective compound in OFIEs by high-speed countercurrent chromatography (HSCCC). HSCCC invented by Ito is attractive methodology in separation of natural products. Among advantages using HSCCC, one of important merits is that HSCCC does not need any solid phase support, so no loss of sample by irreversible adsorption occurrs in solid absorbents. Also, HSCCC shows more reproducible and more rapid separation with high reproducibility than conventional column chromatography such as opened column chromatography because it is controlled by well established solvent system. With these benefits of HSCCC, many researchers have isolated compounds from various natural materials with saving time and costs. In this study, preparative HSCCC apparatus was performed for successful isolation of major flavonoids in OFIEs. Isolated compounds were evaluated their protective activities in hepatocytes against oxidative stress due to ethanol exposure.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Preparation of Opuntia ficus-indica fruit extracts
The fruits of O. ficus-indica were collected from Jeju Island (Republic of Korea). A voucher specimen (DW-1) has been deposited at the Herbarium of Medicinal Plant Garden, College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University (Goyang, Korea). The dry powdered fruit of O. ficus-indica (5 kg) was extracted with 70% ethanol (10 L) three times. After removal of the solvents by evaporation, the residue (385 g) was suspended in distilled water and then successively fractionated with methylene chloride to remove lipids. The water-soluble fraction was fractionated with n-butanol (1.5 L, repeat 3 times). Major flavonoids were in n- butanol fraction while high-polar compounds were removed to water fraction. The n-butanol fraction was evaporated, lyophilized, and stored in a refrigerator before use.
Determination of K (partition coefficient) values using high-performance liquid chromatography
Approximately 5 mg of n-butanol fraction was weighed in a 20 ml test vial into which 3 ml of each phase of the preequilibrated two-phase solvent system was added. The test vial was shaken violently for several minutes to get equilibrium. The upper and lower phases were separated and evaporated under N2 gas, respectively. Dried residues of each phase were dissolved in methanol of 1 mL and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography ultraviolet (HPLC-UV). The K value was obtained by the ratio of peak area between upper and lower phase. The analytical HPLC-UV system consisted of a Finnigan Surveyor HPLC system with a pump, an autosampler, a PDA detector and the Finnigan LCQ Advantage MAX with the Xcalibur® software (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., MA, USA). All of analytes were analyzed by an Ascentis® Express C18 column (150 × 4.6 mm, I.D., 2.7 μm, Supelco Analytical, Bellefonte, PA, USA) with the following gradient system: water with 0.5% formic acid (v/v) (A) and acetonitrile (B); gradient program: 10% B to 90% B, 0–25 min; 90% B to 10% B. Flow rate was set to be at 0.3 mL/min, and all samples were injected with the volume of 10 μL.
Preparation of two-phase solvent system and sample solution
After determination of K value by HPLC-UV, the two-phase solvent system was selected: methylene chloride-methanol-n-butanol-water (5:4:3:5, v/v/v/v). The solvent system was thoroughly equilibrated in a separation funnel by repeatedly vigorously shaking at room temperature, and then separated shortly before use. The n-butanol fraction was dissolved in 5 mL of each phase of selected solvent system for HSCCC separation (1000 mg). The fraction was dissolved before use.
High-speed countercurrent chromatography separation procedure
The mobile phase of solvent system was selected to organic lower phase. The multilayer coil column was filled first with the stationary phase. Then, the mobile upper phase was pumped into the column by a chromatographic pump (L-6200, Hitachi, Japan) at a flow rate of 3 mL/min while preparative HSCCC apparatus (TBE-1000A, Shanghai Tauto Biotech, Co., Ltd., China) was rotated at a revolution speed of 500 rpm. After hydrodynamic equilibrium was established, prepared sample solution was subjected to HSCCC apparatus. The monitoring of HSCCC peak fractions was performed by combining effluent line of the HSCCC apparatus to the UV detector (UV/VIS-151, Gilson Inc., Middleton, WI, USA) at 330 nm. The eluent from the UV detector was collected by a fraction collector (FC-204, Gilson Inc.) in 3 min per each test tube. HSCCC systems were kept the internal column temperature at 25°C by circulatory temperature regulator (RW-0525G, Jeio Tech., Korea).
Identification of isolated peak fractions
HSCCC peak fractions were identified by comparing their 1H,13C NMR, and ESI-MS spectroscopic data with literature values. The optical rotation value was measured to determine the absolute configuration of compound 2 by polarimeter (FT-6500, JASCO Corp., Tokyo, Japan).1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data were obtained on a JEOL LA 300 spectrometer at 300 MHz and 75 MHz, respectively. ESI-MS spectroscopic data were obtained on the Finnigan LCQ advantage MAX with the Xcalibur® chromatographic software.
Evaluation of rat hepatocyte protective activities
Male Sprague Dawley rats were purchased from Koatech Co., Ltd. (Yongin, Korea) with body weights of 200–250 g, housed in conventional cages (two per each cage) at room temperature under a 12 h light-dark cycle and fed ad libitum with free access to water. Isolated rat hepatocytes were prepared from male Sprague Dawley rats by collagenase perfusion technique of Berry and Friend, by means of minor modifications. The isolated rat hepatocytes were plated onto each cell culture dishes (35 mm × 10 mm, 4 × 105 cells/dishes). After 18 h, the cultured cells were treated with or without each sample for 2 h. Then, the hepatocytes were exposed to 200 mM ethanol for 48 h to induce hepatotoxicity. Cell viability was detected by MTT assay which relies on mitochondrial metabolic capacity of viable cells. Prepared MTT solution (0.2 mL, 5 mg/mL in PBS) was added into each plate after 48 h incubation. After 2 h, the supernatant was removed and 0.6 mL of DMSO was added to each plate to dissolve the formazan crystals. The absorbance was measured by spectrophotometer (Spectra Max340PC, USA) at 540 nm. Data were expressed as the value of relative protection (%) calculated as 100 × (value for the ethanol-treated − value of sample)/(value for the ethanol-treated − value of control). Quercetin was chosen as a positive control against ethanol-intoxicated oxidative stress. All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Seoul National University and conducted with special care taken to avoid any undue animal pain or suffering.
Cellular glutathione content and activities of related enzyme assay
Cells from culture plates were pooled in 2 mL of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and homogenized. The homogenate was centrifuged for 25 min at 3000 g at 4°C and the supernatant was collected for the measurements of antioxidant enzyme and glutathione contents. Total glutathione (GSH + oxidized glutathione [GSSG]) in the supernatant was determined spectrophotometrically using the enzymatic cycling method. Glutathione reductase (GR) activity was measured according to the method based on the reduction of GSSG by GR in the presence of NADPH. The activity of glutathione peroxidase (GPx) was determined by quantifying the rate of oxidation of GSH to GSSG using cumene hydroperoxide., Each value was shown the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three experiments.
One-way analysis of variance procedures were used to assess significant differences among control groups and treatment groups. For each significant effect of treatment, the Student's t-test was used for comparisons of multiple group means. The criterion for statistical significance was set at P < 0.05, 0.01, or 0.001. The calculations were performed with the SAS 9.1 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
| Results and Discussion|| |
Selection of high-speed countercurrent chromatography solvent system
Through several trials with the change solvent systems, as shown in [Table 1], the K values of flavonoids were in the range of 0.2 < K <2 in the solvent system comprising methylene chloride-methanol-n-butanol-water (5:4:3:5, v/v/v/v). Chemical structures of flavonoids are shown in [Figure 1].
|Table 1: The K (partition coefficient) values of compound 1-4 in different solvent systems|
Click here to view
|Figure 1: Chemical structures of isolated flavonoids in Opuntia ficus-indica fruit extracts|
Click here to view
High-speed countercurrent chromatography separation
Four flavonoids were successfully separated by HSCCC. Quercetin 3-O-methyl ether (1, 312–251 min, 18 mg), (+)-taxifolin (2, 381–396 min, 11 mg), isorhamnetin 3-O-β-D-glucoside (3, 411–450 min, 7 mg), and narcissin (4, 462–522 min, 17 mg) were obtained [Figure 2]. The purity of isolated flavonoids was >90% as evaluated by HPLC-UV at 330 nm [Figure 3]. The structures of all compounds were confirmed by ESI-MS,1H, and 13C NMR spectra by comparing previous literature., The measured optical rotation value of compound 2 was + 40.1 (25°C, c = 0.3 in methanol) that confirm its structure to (+)-taxifolin. Spectroscopic data of quercetin 3-O-methyl ether (1), (+)-taxifolin (2), isorhamnetin 3-O-β-D-glucoside (3), and narcissin (4) were in agreement with published data (T1, 2 and F1 in Supplementary material).
|Figure 2: High-speed countercurrent chromatography chromatogram of the Opuntia ficus-indica fruit extracts n-butanol fraction. Solvent system consists of methylene chloride-methanol-n-butanol-water (5:4:3:5, v/v/v/v). 1,000 mg of n-BuOH fraction (dissolved in 5 mL of each phase of the solvent system) was injected; flow rate of 3 mL/min; rotation speed of 500 rpm; retention of stationary phase in (A) and (B) were approximately over 50%|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: High-performance liquid chromatography chromatograms of the (a) crude n-butanol fraction and (b) collected compounds by high-speed countercurrent chromatography. High-performance liquid chromatography experimental condition: an Ascentis® Express C18 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, I.D., 2.7 μm, Supelco Analytical, USA), with the following gradient system was used: water with 0.5% formic acid (v/v) (a) and acetonitrile (b); gradient program: 10% B to 90% B, 0–25 min; 90% B to 10% B. Flow rate was set to be at 0.3 mL/min. All samples were injected with the volume of 10 μL|
Click here to view
Evaluation of rat hepatocyte protective activities
Before evaluation of hepatoprotective activities, OFIEs showed no cytotoxic effect comparing with the control group (at 100 μg/mL of the extract, not shown). The OFIEs, its n- butanol fraction, and all of isolated flavonoids exhibited protective activities [Figure 4]. Among them, (+)-taxifolin (2) was showed the most significant protective activity (55.3% at 50 μM), which is higher than the level of 100 uM quercetin (47.3%). To elucidate the biochemical mechanism of the hepatoprotective activity of the (+)-taxifolin, their effects on the level of cellular GSH and activities of related enzymes (Gpx and GR) were measured. As shown in [Table 2], (+)-taxifolin preserved activities of Gpx and GR and elevated the level of reduced GSH against ethanol.
|Figure 4: Protective effects of Opuntia ficus-indica fruit extracts and n-BuOH fraction, isolated compounds (1–4), and quercetin (positive control) on intoxicated hepatocytes by ethanol exposure. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation (n = 9). ###Differs significantly from the untreated, control group at the level of P < 0.001. *,**,***Differs significantly from ethanol-treated group at the level P < 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively (analysis of variance test)|
Click here to view
|Table 2: Effect of (+)-taxifolin 50 μM on the oxidized glutathione/glutathione ratio and activities of glutathione reductase, and glutathione peroxidase on hepatocytes damaged by alcoholic oxidative stress|
Click here to view
| Conclusion|| |
Major flavonoids in OFIEs, quercetin 3-O-methyl ether (1), (+)-taxifolin (2), isorhamnetin 3-O-β-D-glucoside (3), and narcissin (4) were successfully separated by HSCCC. Among isolated compounds, (+)-taxifolin exhibited significant protection on hepatocytes against alcoholic oxidative stress. Effects of cellular glutathione and related enzymes indicate that the hepatoprotective activity of (+)-taxifolin may be due to maintaining the level of GSH. This result would be attributed to the powerful anti-oxidative activity of taxifolin., To sum, OFIEs and its active compound, (+)-taxifolin were suggested to reduce hepatic damage by alcoholic oxidative stress. Biological relevance of the (+)-taxifolin in vivo needs to be studied further.
Financial support and sponsorship
This work was supported by a grant of the Korea Healthcare technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (A110338-1202-0000200).
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Ahn DK. Illustrated Book of Korean Medicinal Herbs. Seoul: KyoHak Publishing Co., Ltd.; 1998.
Trejo-González A, Gabriel-Ortiz G, Puebla-Pérez AM, Huízar-Contreras MD, Munguía-Mazariegos MR, Mejía-Arreguín S, et al.
A purified extract from prickly pear cactus (Opuntia fuliginosa
) controls experimentally induced diabetes in rats. J Ethnopharmacol 1996;55:27-33.
Alimi H, Hfaiedh N, Bouoni Z, Hfaiedh M, Sakly M, Zourgui L, et al.
Antioxidant and antiulcerogenic activities of Opuntia ficus indica
f. inermis root extract in rats. Phytomedicine 2010;17:1120-6.
Vazquez-Ramirez R, Olguin-Martinez M, Kubli-Garfias C, Hernandez-Munoz R. Reversing gastric mucosal alterations during ethanol-induced chronic gastritis in rats by oral administration of Opuntia ficus-indica
mucilage. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:4318-24.
Kim SH, Jeon BJ, Kim DH, Kim TI, Lee HK, Han DS, et al.
Prickly pear cactus (Opuntia ficus indica
var. saboten) protects against stress-induced acute gastric lesions in rats. J Med Food 2012;15:968-73.
Lim KT. Inhibitory effect of glycoprotein isolated from Opuntia ficus-indica
var. saboten MAKINO on activities of allergy-mediators in compound 48/80-stimulated mast cells. Cell Immunol 2010;264:78-85.
Kim JM, Kim DH, Park SJ, Park DH, Jung SY, Kim HJ, et al.
The n-butanolic extract of Opuntia ficus-indica
var. saboten enhances long-term memory in the passive avoidance task in mice. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2010;34:1011-7.
Wiese J, McPherson S, Odden MC, Shlipak MG. Effect of Opuntia ficus indica
on symptoms of the alcohol hangover. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1334-40.
Alimi H, Hfaeidh N, Mbarki S, Bouoni Z, Sakly M, Ben Rouma K. Evaluation of Opuntia ficus indica
f. inermis fruit juice hepatoprotective effect upon ethanol toxicity in rats. Gen Physiol Biophys 2012;31:335-42.
Galati EM, Mondello MR, Lauriano ER, Taviano MF, Galluzzo M, Miceli N. Opuntia ficus indica
(L.) Mill. fruit juice protects liver from carbon tetrachloride-induced injury. Phytother Res 2005;19:796-800.
Morán-Ramos S, Avila-Nava A, Tovar AR, Pedraza-Chaverri J, López-Romero P, Torres N. Opuntia ficus indica
(nopal) attenuates hepatic steatosis and oxidative stress in obese Zucker (fa/fa) rats. J Nutr 2012;142:1956-63.
Ncibi S, Ben Othman M, Akacha A, Krifi MN, Zourgui L. Opuntia ficus indica
extract protects against chlorpyrifos-induced damage on mice liver. Food Chem Toxicol 2008;46:797-802.
Stintzing FC, Schieber A, Carle R. Identification of betalains from yellow beet (Beta vulgaris
L.) and cactus pear [Opuntia ficus-indica
(L.) Mill.] by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J Agric Food Chem 2002;50:2302-7.
Lee EH, Kim HJ, Song YS, Jin C, Lee KT, Cho J, et al.
Constituents of the stems and fruits of Opuntia ficus-indica
var. saboten. Arch Pharm Res 2003;26:1018-23.
Saleem M, Kim HJ, Han CK, Jin C, Lee YS. Secondary metabolites from Opuntia ficus-indica
var. saboten. Phytochemistry 2006;67:1390-4.
Ito Y. Efficient preparative countercurrent chromatography with a coil planet centrifuge. J Chromatogr 1981;214:122-5.
Berry MN, Friend DS. High-yield preparation of isolated rat liver parenchymal cells: A biochemical and fine structural study. J Cell Biol 1969;43:506-20.
Kim JW, Yang H, Cho N, Kim B, Kim YC, Sung SH. Hepatoprotective constituents of Firmiana simplex
stem bark against ethanol insult to primary rat hepatocytes. Pharmacogn Mag 2015;11:55-60.
Tietze F. Enzymic method for quantitative determination of nanogram amounts of total and oxidized glutathione: Applications to mammalian blood and other tissues. Anal Biochem 1969;27:502-22.
Carlberg I, Mannervik B. Purification and characterization of the flavoenzyme glutathione reductase from rat liver. J Biol Chem 1975;250:5475-80.
Flohé L, Günzler WA. Assays of glutathione peroxidase. Methods Enzymol 1984;105:114-21.
Li YL, Li J, Wang NL, Yao XS. Flavonoids and a new polyacetylene from Bidens parviflora
Willd. Molecules 2008;13:1931-41.
Lee YS, Lee S, Lee HS, Kim BK, Ohuchi K, Shin KH. Inhibitory effects of isorhamnetin-3-O-beta-D-glucoside from Salicornia herbacea
on rat lens aldose reductase and sorbitol accumulation in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat tissues. Biol Pharm Bull 2005;28:916-8.
Yun BS, Lee IK, Kim JP, Chung SH, Shim GS, Yoo ID. Lipid peroxidation inhibitory activity of some constituents isolated from the stem bark of Eucalyptus globulus
. Arch Pharm Res 2000;23:147-50.
Maroziene A, Kliukiene R, Sarlauskas J, Cenas N. Inhibition of phthalocyanine-sensitized photohemolysis of human erythrocytes by polyphenolic antioxidants: Description of quantitative structure-activity relationships. Cancer Lett 2000;157:39-44.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
[Table 1], [Table 2]