Home | About PM | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact us |  Login 
Pharmacognosy Magazine
Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
 

 
  Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 51  |  Page : 452-457  

Cytotoxic, antimitotic, and antiproliferation studies on Rasam: A South Indian traditional functional food


1 Department of Pharmaceutics, Hillside College of Pharmacy and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka; Department of Pharmacy, Centre for Research and Development, PRIST University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Pharmacy, Centre for Research and Development, PRIST University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Submission11-Apr-2017
Date of Acceptance18-May-2017
Date of Web Publication11-Oct-2017

Correspondence Address:
Agilandeswari Devarajan
Department of Pharmaceutics, Hillside College of Pharmacy and Research Centre, #9, Raguhuvanahalli, Kanakapura Main Road, Bengaluru - 560 062, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/pm.pm_138_17

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Background: Rasam is a traditional South Indian food, prepared using tamarind juice as a base, with a variety of spices. Rasam, with all its ingredients medicinally claimed for various ailments, is a functional food. Systematic consumption of traditional functional food provides an excellent preventive measure to ward off many diseases. Objective: To study rasam for cytotoxic, antimitotic, and antiproliferation potential beyond its culinary and nutritional effect. Materials and Methods: Brine shrimp lethality assay, onion root tip inhibition assay, and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay in Calu-6, HeLa, MCF-7 cell lines for four stage-wise samples in the preparation of rasam (RS1, RS2, RS3, and RS4) were studied. Results: RS4, the end product of rasam showed high lethality with an LC50value of 38.7 μ L/mL. It showed maximum antimitotic activity in a dose-dependent manner compared to other samples with an IC50value of 189.86 μ L/mL. RS4 also showed an IC50value of 350.22 and 410.15 μ L/mL in MCF-7 and Calu-6 cell lines, respectively. Conclusion: From this study, we suggest that rasam is a classic example of traditional functional food and it can treat breast and lung cancer on chronic use.
Abbreviations used: SS 316: Stainless Steel 316 grade; MTT: 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; DMEM: Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium; FBS: Fetal bovine serum media; TPVG: Trypsin phosphate versene glucose; EDTA: Ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid; PBS: Phosphate buffered saline; DMSO: Dimethyl sulfoxide.

Keywords: Brine shrimp lethality, Calu-6, HeLa, MCF-7, onion root tip inhibition, Saaru


How to cite this article:
Devarajan A, Mohan Maruga Raja M K. Cytotoxic, antimitotic, and antiproliferation studies on Rasam: A South Indian traditional functional food. Phcog Mag 2017;13, Suppl S3:452-7

How to cite this URL:
Devarajan A, Mohan Maruga Raja M K. Cytotoxic, antimitotic, and antiproliferation studies on Rasam: A South Indian traditional functional food. Phcog Mag [serial online] 2017 [cited 2021 Oct 26];13, Suppl S3:452-7. Available from: http://www.phcog.com/text.asp?2017/13/51/452/216338



Summary

  • Rasam, a South Indian traditional functional food, showed high lethality (LC50 = 38.7 μL/mL) against brine shrimps
  • Rasam also showed potential antimitotic activity (IC50 = 189.86 μL/mL) by inhibiting the onion root tips
  • Rasam showed an IC50 value of 350.22 and 410.15 μL/mL against MCF-7 and Calu-6 cell lines respectively
  • Rasam, when consumed on daily dietary basis, can treat breast and lung cancer.



   Introduction Top


The view that food can have an expanded role that goes well beyond providing a source of nutrients truly applies to traditional functional foods. The systematic consumption of traditional functional food provides an excellent preventive measure to ward off many diseases. Epidemiological randomized clinical trials carried out in different countries have demonstrated numerous health effects related to functional food consumption such as reduction of cancer risk, improvement of heart health, stimulation of immune system, decrease of menopause symptoms, improvement of gastrointestinal health, maintenance of urinary tract health, anti-inflammatory effects, reduction of blood pressure, maintenance of vision, antibacterial effect, antiviral effect, reduction of osteoporosis, and anti-obese effect.[1] Traditional functional foods can help prevent chronic disease or optimize health, therefore reducing health-care costs and improving the quality of life.

Spices play very important role in digestive function and the Indian tradition has a long history of use of spice in food as medicines to prevent and treat diseases.[2] Another epidemiological study suggested that curcumin, the bioactive compound of turmeric, as one of the most prevalent nutritional and medicinal compounds used by the Indian population, is responsible for the significantly reduced (4.4 times) prevalence of cardiovascular diseases, metabolic diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, and cancer in India compared to the United States of America.[3] It is also estimated that an adult in India consumes 80–200 mg/day of curcumin and 50 g of garlic in 1 week. Hence, there is a realistic possibility to reach a therapeutic dose by daily dietary consumption.[4],[5] The whole world realized only in the 20th century that food plays a major role in disease prevention, but centuries before ancient India has realized the importance of food in health and wellness.

Rasam is a very popular South Indian traditional spice soup. It is consumed on daily basis in every South Indian home. It is also called as rasam or chaaru or saaru in different South Indian languages. In a traditional South Indian meal, rasam is preceded by a sambar rice course and is followed by curd rice. Rasam is traditionally prepared using tamarind juice as a base, with a variety of spices which are considered to be good for health.[6] The main spices used in rasam preparation are coriander, garlic, curry leaves, tamarind, cumin, black pepper, mustard, turmeric, red chili, and asafetida.[7]Rasam is a functional food because all ingredients used in the preparation of rasam are medicinally claimed for various ailments. Sambar, another South Indian traditional dish, has shown preventive effect against colon cancer.[8] There is a need to understand traditional systems and visualize the future of medicine and health care. The linkage between “the past” and “the future” of medicine is much more important and can give us “new directions” for better understanding health, disease, and possible solutions.[9]

A study on rasam, which is being consumed from time immemorial, is only an approach of “drug rediscovery.” In view of all the above facts, rasam was studied for cytotoxic, antimitotic, and antiproliferation potential beyond its culinary and nutritional effect.


   Materials and Methods Top


Materials

All ingredients of rasam were purchased from Arokya Organic Shop, Vellore, Tamil Nadu. All utensils used for the preparation of rasam were of Stainless Steel 316 grade (SS 316). Brine shrimp eggs were purchased from Ocean Star International Inc., Snowville, UT, USA. Onion bulbs were purchased from Nutrisiree Organics, Bengaluru, Karnataka. MCF-7 (ATCC HTB-22, passage number 11), HeLa (ATCC CCL2, passage number 13), CALU-6 (ATCC HTB-56, passage number 19) cell lines were procured. 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) reagent, Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum (FBS) media, trypsin phosphate versene glucose (TPVG) solution, ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA), phosphate buffered saline (PBS), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), trypsin, acetocarmine, and cedar wood oil were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Bengaluru, India) and HiMedia Ltd., (Mumbai, India). All other chemicals and solvents were obtained from SD Fine Chemicals (Mumbai, India) and were of analytical grade.

Preparation of rasam

Rasam was prepared in five stages as mentioned below.

  1. Tamarind fruit pulp mixture (T1): 6.88 g of tamarind fruit pulp was immersed in 450 mL of water for 10 min, and then it was hand crushed for 45 times and strained. The strained liquid was rinsed with 5 mL water, to which 0.4 g of turmeric powder and 4 g of sea salt were added
  2. Tomato fruit mixture (T2): 82.44 g of fresh tomato fruits were cut and hand crushed for 60 times. The crushed fruit was rinsed with 5 mL of water
  3. Spice mixture (T3): 1.33 g of pepper drupes was crushed in an SS 316 mortar and pestle for 85 times. 2.67 g of cumin fruits was added over to the crushed pepper drupes and crushed for 100 times. To the above-crushed mixture, 0.82 g of chili pepper was added and crushed for 50 times; then, 9.63 g of garlic cloves was added and crushed for 90 times
  4. All mixture (T4): Tomato fruit mixture (T2) was rinsed with 10 mL of water and spice mixture (T3) was rinsed with 10 mL of water. Both rinsing were added to tamarind fruit pulp mixture (T1), which was designated as sample RS1
  5. Final product (T5): 4 ml of Indian sesame oil was heated at 60°C for 2 min. After 5 seconds 0.82 g of mustard seeds were added. After 3 s, 1.53 g of whole chili pepper was added. After 2 s, 0.61 g of curry leaves was added, which was designated as sample RS2. Immediately, all mixture (T4) was rinsed with 20 mL of water and added. The whole liquid was allowed to boil for 5 min. After 5 min, 1.50 g of coriander leaves was added; this was designated as sample RS3. When the liquid frothed, 0.05 g of asafetida was added and the heating was switched off to yield the final product, which was designated as sample RS4.


The stage-wise samples RS1, RS2, RS3, and RS4 in the preparation of rasam were studied to evaluate the significance of the traditional processing.

Cytotoxicity study

Cytotoxicity was studied by brine shrimp lethality bioassay as per the method of Meyer et al., 1982.[10] Brine shrimps (Artemia salina) were hatched from eggs in a conical-shaped vessel (1 L), filled with artificial seawater (prepared using sea salt 38 g/L and adjusted to pH 8.5 using 1 N NaOH) with constant aeration for 36 h at room temperature (20°C ± 5°C) under light. After hatching, active nauplii, free from egg shells, were collected from brighter portion of the hatching chamber and used for the assay. Ten nauplii were drawn through a glass capillary and placed in vials each containing 4.5 mL of brine solution (24% of NaCl in water). In every vial, 0.5 mL of water or sample was added to the brine solution and maintained at room temperature (20°C ± 5°C) under light. The number of surviving nauplii after 24 h was counted. Experiments were conducted at different concentrations (20, 40, 80, 120, 160, 200, and 400 μL/mL) of the samples (RS1, RS2, RS3, and RS4) diluents being water. Each concentration of the sample was studied in six vials along with a control group.

The %lethality was determined from the number of surviving nauplii in control and sample using the below-mentioned formula.



Control is number of surviving nauplii in control, and sample is number of surviving nauplii in sample. LC50 values were calculated from percentage lethality versus concentration best-fit line graph.

Antimitotic study

Antimitotic study was studied by onion root tip inhibition assay as per the method of Rai et al., 2007.[11] The old roots of Allium cepa bulbs (56.46 ± 4.14 g; values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation [SD]) were removed and grown in the dark over a small beaker containing 35 mL of tap water (the water was changed every 24 h) at 20°C ± 5°C until the root tips have grown to approximately 2–3 cm (in approximately 2–3 days). The bulbs with root tips grown up to 2–3 cm were selected. Ten root tips grown above 2 cm were kept as such, and rest of them were trimmed off. The bulbs with only 10 root tips were placed over water or sample solutions, and incubation was carried out at 20°C ± 5°C. Samples RS1, RS3, and RS4 each at a concentration of 1, 10, 100, and 200 μL/mL were studied in triplicate. The oil sample (RS3) would form a layer on the surface and never allow the growth of the root tip; hence, RS3 was omitted for this study.

In each bulb, root length and newly grown root tips were recorded at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h. One root in each bulb was cut using a scalpel between 8.00 to 13.00 h IST at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h. Extreme root tips (2–3 mm) of root were cut and put in a test tube containing water. The test tube was treated with 1.5 mL of 0.1 N HCl and incubated at 60°C for 12 min. The 0.1 N HCl was drained and the root tips were washed with water 4 times to remove the acid traces. Then, five drops of acetocarmine was added and incubated at 60°C for 24 min. The red turned root tip was transferred to a clean glass slide and a cover slip was placed over. Very gentle pressure was applied with thumb over the cover slip to provide uniform spread of the cells. The number of mitotic and total meristematic cells was counted in 5–6 fields using high power (×100) light microscope. For control and all samples, 500 cells were counted and cells manifesting different stages of mitosis, i.e., interphase and prophase (P), metaphase (M), anaphase (A), and telophase (T), were recorded. The mitotic index at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h was calculated using the following formula.

Mitotic index = (P + M + A + T)/(Total number of cells) × 100

P, M, A, and T is prophase, metaphase, anaphase, and telophase, respectively.

IC50 values were calculated from the concentration versus percentage of inhibition best-fit line graph. The values are expressed as mean ± SD. GraphPad Instat Version 4 software (GraphPad Software, USA) was used. Data were subjected to the one-way analysis of variance to determine the significance of changes followed by Dunnett's multiple comparisons.

Antiproliferation study

MCF-7, HeLa, and Calu-6 stock cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% inactivated FBS, penicillin (100 IU/mL), streptomycin (100 μg/mL), and amphotericin B (5 μg/mL) in humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C until confluent. The cells were dissociated with TPVG solution (0.2% trypsin, 0.02% EDTA, 0.05% glucose in PBS). The viability of the cells was checked and centrifuged.

MTT assay was carried out by the modified method of Lau et al., 2004.[12] The monolayer cell culture was trypsinized and the cell count was adjusted to 1 × 105 cells/mL using DMEM containing 10% FBS. To each well of the 96-well microtiter plate, 100 μL of the diluted cell suspension (5 × 104 cells/well) was added and incubated for 24 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. After 24 h, the supernatant was flicked off and the monolayer was washed with the medium once.[13] All samples were mixed with DMEM supplemented with 2% inactivated FBS to obtain different concentrations, ranging from 166.67 to 500 μL/mL. Samples were added onto the partial monolayer in microtiter plates. The plates were then incubated at 37°C for 72 h in 5% CO2 atmosphere. After 72 h, the test solutions in the wells were discarded and 50 μL of MTT (5 mg/10 mL of MTT in PBS) was added to each well. The plates were gently shaken and incubated for 4 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere. The supernatant was removed, 100 μl of DMSO was added, and the plates were gently shaken to solubilize the formed formazan. The absorbance was measured using a Tecan microplate reader at a wavelength of 590 nm. The percentage inhibition was calculated using the following formula.

Percentage inhibition = (ABS of control − ABS of samples)/(ABS of control) × 100

ABS is absorbance and IC50 values were calculated from the concentration versus percentage of inhibition best-fit line graph.


   Results and Discussion Top


Brine shrimp lethality assay is a rapid, reliable and has been used for over 30 years in cytotoxic, phototoxic, pesticidal, trypanocidal, enzyme inhibition, and ion regulation activities.[14] The nauplii after hatching at 0 and 24 h are shown in [Figure 1]. RS4, the final product of rasam, showed high lethality (38.7 μL/mL) than RS1 (165.6 μL/mL), RS2 (387.6 μL/mL), and RS3 (124.2 μL/mL) [Table 1]. The percentage of lethality was found to be directly proportional to the concentration of the samples. Stagewise preparation analysis shows 3.2-fold increase of cytotoxicity in RS4 as compared to of RS1, RS2, and RS3. It is evident that the process in preparation of rasam plays an important role in increasing the physiological action of the final product (RS4). Brine shrimp lethality bioassay has good correlation with the human solid tumor cell lines;[15] hence, it can be suggested that the sample RS4 is bioactive, with cytotoxic and antitumor activity.
Figure 1: Brine shrimp nauplii after hatching at 0 and 24 h

Click here to view
Table 1: The lethality effect of RS1, RS2, RS3, and RS4 on brine shrimps

Click here to view


Most of the plant-derived anticancer drugs affect the microtubule dynamics of the cell and induce persistent modification of biological processes and signaling pathways that ultimately lead to apoptotic death.[16] Onion root tip inhibition assay is a quick, efficient, simple but sensitive antimitotic bioassay and also known to give a similar result to the in vitro animal cytotoxicity test.[17] The study showed that at 72 h, RS1, RS3, and RS4 at all concentrations (1, 10, 100, and 200 μL/mL) significantly inhibits root growth [Table 2]. [Figure 2] shows the effect of RS1 (200 μL/mL), RS3 (200 μL/mL), and RS4 (200 μL/mL) on root tip growth at 72 h in comparison to the control group. It is evident that all samples affect cell division in long duration. There was no increase in root length for RS1 (200 μL/mL) and RS3 (200 μL/mL) after 24 h. The final product RS4 at 200 μL/mL showed no increase in root length even after 0 h, suggesting maximum root inhibition. RS3 (200 μL/mL) and RS4 (100 and 200 μL/mL) significantly prevented the growth of new root tips after 0 h [Table 2]. However, after 72 h, all samples at different concentrations also significantly inhibited the growth of new root tips. RS4 (200 μL/mL) not only significantly inhibits the root length but also prevents the growth of a new root tip after 0 h. The number of cells in prophase was nearly double the metaphase in RS1, RS3, and RS4 treated groups. The number of cells in telophase varied from 9 to 12 within the counted 500 cells of all sample-treated groups. The number of dividing cells affected and the mitotic index clearly confirms that RS4 (200 μL/mL) at 24 h significantly inhibits mitosis [Table 3]. RS3 (100 and 200 μL/mL) and RS4 (10 and 100 μL/mL) showed lesser number of dividing cells and lower mitotic index after 72 h. The IC50 value (189.86 μL/mL) of the final product of RS4 (rasam) only confirms maximum inhibition of mitosis in a dose-dependent manner compared to RS1 and RS3 [Table 3], and also, the IC50 value of RS4 was found to be 2.2 times lower than its constituents (RS1 and RS3). Antitumor drugs that interact with microtubules and tubulin are known to block mitosis and induce cell death by apoptosis.[18] Hence, it can be suggested that the exhibited antimitotic activity of RS4 may be due to its interaction with microtubules.
Table 2: Effect of RS1, RS3, and RS4 on root length and newly grown root tips at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h

Click here to view
Figure 2: Effect of RS1, RS3, and RS4 on onion root tip growth at 72 h

Click here to view
Table 3: Effect of RS1, RS3, and RS4 on total number of dividing cells, mitotic index at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h, and their IC50 values after 72 h

Click here to view


RS4 showed an IC50 value of 350.22 and 410.15 μL/mL in MCF-7 and Calu-6 cell lines, respectively [Table 4]. RS1, RS2, and RS3 showed an IC50 value more than 500 μL/mL in MCF-7, HeLa, and Calu-6 cell lines, respectively. The results showed that the final product RS4 may be active against breast and lung cancers. However, the mechanism for such an effect needs further evaluation.
Table 4: Percentage of inhibition and IC50 values of RS1, RS2, RS3, and RS4 in MCF-7, HeLa, and Calu-6 cell lines

Click here to view


The postmodern “preventive medicine” concept of the Western medicine has absolutely recognized that food plays an important role in the incidence of many diseases. Dietary choice remains the basis for maintaining a healthy lifestyle and well-being, especially relating to cardiovascular disease, diabetes, obesity, hypertension, some cancers, circulatory diseases, and stroke, despite remarkable advances in medicine and pharmaceutical drug development.[19],[20] According to the National Cancer Registry Programme of the India Council of Medical Research, more than 1300 Indians die every day due to cancer. Between 2012 and 2014, the mortality rate due to cancer increased by approximately 6%. The risk of cancer incidence may also be due to the deviation from traditional functional food toward fast, junk, and westernized foods.

The different ingredients used in rasam have been individually attributed to various pharmacological effects in preclinical and clinical studies. It is trouble-free to ascertain that the rasam's effects are due to the antioxidant effect of tamarind fruit pulp;[21],[22] antioxidant and anticarcinogenic effect of turmeric;[23] antioxidant and anticancer activity of chili pepper;[21] antioxidant activity of cumin;[21] anticancer and antioxidant effects of garlic bulbs;[21],[24],[25],[26],[27] antioxidant and bioavailability enhancing effect of black pepper;[28],[29] and antioxidant activity of coriander leaves.[30] However, if all ingredients and/or active constituents of rasam were scientifically formulated together using available technology, it may not yield the desired physiological result; however, somehow in the preparation of rasam, the traditional processing naturally ensures higher cytotoxic, antimitotic, and antiproliferation activity in the final product. The LC50 and IC50 values of rasam may not be very significant compared to active pharmaceutical agents that are administered in a fixed dose but consuming rasam as daily diet can ensure healing effect. The real challenge lies not in proving whether rasam is functional foods having health benefits, but in defining what these benefits are and developing the methods to expose them by scientific means.


   Conclusion Top


Rasam is a South Indian traditional functional food that can treat breast and lung cancer on chronic use.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Choudhary R, Tandon RV. Consumption of functional food and our health concerns. Pak J Physiol 2009;5:76-83.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Weiss RS. Recipes for Immortality: Healing, Religion, and Community in South India. 1st ed. Wellington: Oxford University Press; 2009.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Calabrese V, Cornelius C, Dinkova-Kostova AT, Calabrese EJ, Mattson MP. Cellular stress responses, the hormesis paradigm, and vitagenes: Novel targets for therapeutic intervention in neurodegenerative disorders. Antioxid Redox Signal 2010;13:1763-811.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Tapsell LC, Hemphill I, Cobiac L, Patch CS, Sullivan DR, Fenech M, et al. Health benefits of herbs and spices: The past, the present, the future. Med J Aust 2006;185:S4-24.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Sainani GS, Desai DB, Gorhe NH, Natu SM, Pise DV, Sainani PG, et al. Dietary garlic, onion and some coagulation parameters in Jain community. J Assoc Physicians India 1979;27:707-12.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Todiwala C. Mr Todiwala's Spice Box: 120 Recipes with Just 10 Spices. 1st ed. London: Octopus Publishing Group; 2016.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Srinivasan K. Spices as influencers of body metabolism; an overview of three decades of research. Food Res Int 2005;38:77-86.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Prasad VG, Reddy N, Francis A, Nayak PG, Kishore A, Nandakumar K, et al. Sambar, an Indian dish prevents the development of dimethyl hydrazine-induced colon cancer: A preclinical study. Pharmacogn Mag 2016;12 Suppl 4:S441-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Patwardhan B, Khambholja K. Drug discovery and ayurveda: Win-win relationship between contemporary and ancient sciences. In: Kapetanovic I, editor. Drug Discovery and Development – Present and Future. Croatia: In Tech; 2011. p. 9-10.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Meyer BN, Ferrigni NR, Putnam JE, Jacobsen LB, Nichols DE, McLaughlin JL, et al. Brine shrimp: A convenient general bioassay for active plant constituents. Planta Med 1982;45:31-4.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Rai KM, Basavaraju YB, Sadashivamurthy B. Biological assay and antimitotic activity of novel analogues of β-apopicropodophyllin. Indian J Pharm Sci 2007;69:116-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Lau CB, Ho CY, Kim CF, Leung KN, Fung KP, Tse TF, et al. Cytotoxic activities of Coriolus versicolor (Yunzhi) extract on human leukemia and lymphoma cells by induction of apoptosis. Life Sci 2004;75:797-808.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Mallone R, Mannering SI, Brooks-Worrell BM, Durinovic-Belló I, Cilio CM, Wong FS, et al. Isolation and preservation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells for analysis of islet antigen-reactive T cell responses: Position statement of the T-cell workshop committee of the immunology of diabetes society. Clin Exp Immunol 2011;163:33-49.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Solis PN, Wright CW, Anderson MM, Gupta MP, Phillipson JD. A microwell cytotoxicity assay using Artemia salina (brine shrimp). Planta Med 1993;59:250-2.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Anderson JE, Goetz CM, McLaughlin JL, Suffness M. A blind comparison of simple bench-top bioassays and human tumour cell cytotoxicities as antitumor prescreens. Phytochem Anal 1991;2:107-11.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Mollinedo F, Gajate C. Microtubules, microtubule-interfering agents and apoptosis. Apoptosis 2003;8:413-50.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Babatunde B, Anabuike F.In vivo cytogenotoxicity of electronic waste leachate from Iloabuchi electronic market, Diobu, Rivers State, Nigeria on Allium cepa. Challenges 2015;6:173-87.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Jordan MA, Wilson L. Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs. Nat Rev Cancer 2004;4:253-65.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Zarraga IG, Schwarz ER. Impact of dietary patterns and interventions on cardiovascular health. Circulation 2006;114:961-73.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Retelny VS, Neuendorf A, Roth JL. Nutrition protocols for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Nutr Clin Pract 2008;23:468-76.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Parthasarathy VA, Chempakam B, Zachariah TJ, editors. Chemistry of Spices. 1st ed. Oxfordshire: CAB International; 2008.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Caluwe EDe, Halamova K, Damme PV. Tamarindus indica L. – A review of traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology. Afrika Focus 2010;23:53-83.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Itokawa H, Shi Q, Akiyama T, Morris-Natschke SL, Lee KH. Recent advances in the investigation of curcuminoids. Chin Med 2008;3:11.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Banerjee SK, Dinda AK, Manchanda SC, Maulik SK. Chronic garlic administration protects rat heart against oxidative stress induced by ischemic reperfusion injury. BMC Pharmacol 2002;2:16.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Hassan HT. Ajoene (natural garlic compound): A new anti-leukaemia agent for AML therapy. Leuk Res 2004;28:667-71.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Tilli CM, Stavast-Kooy AJ, Vuerstaek JD, Thissen MR, Krekels GA, Ramaekers FC, et al. The garlic-derived organosulfur component ajoene decreases basal cell carcinoma tumor size by inducing apoptosis. Arch Dermatol Res 2003;295:117-23.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Terrasson J, Xu B, Li M, Allart S, Davignon JL, Zhang LH, et al. Activities of Z-ajoene against tumour and viral spreading in vitro. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2007;21:281-9.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Vijayakumar RS, Surya D, Nalini N. Antioxidant efficacy of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) and piperine in rats with high fat diet induced oxidative stress. Redox Rep 2004;9:105-10.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Khajuria A, Thusu N, Zutshi U. Piperine modulates permeability characteristics of intestine by inducing alterations in membrane dynamics: Influence on brush border membrane fluidity, ultrastructure and enzyme kinetics. Phytomedicine 2002;9:224-31.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Melo EA, Bion FM, Filho JM, Guerra NB.In vivo antioxidant effect of aqueous and etheric coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) extracts. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 2003;105:483-7.  Back to cited text no. 30
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
     Introduction
   Materials and Me...
   Results and Disc...
     Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2212    
    Printed33    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded88    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal