Close
  Indian J Med Microbiol
 

Figure 5: Effects of AMK, PCW, CUP, and M. officinalis on Kv2.2 currents. (Aa, Ba, Ca, and Da) Current–voltage relationships of Kv2.2 channel currents in the presence and absence of AMK, PCW, CUP and M. officinalis (Ab, Bb, Cb, and Db). Average concentration dependence of Kv2.2 channel current inhibition by AMK and M. officinalis. However, PCW and CUP had no effect on Kv2.2 channel currents. AMK: Atractylodes macrocephala Koidzumi; PCW: Poria cocos Wolf; CUP: Citrus unshiu peel; M. officinalis: Magnolia officinalis Bark; Kv: Voltage-dependent K+

Figure 5: Effects of AMK, PCW, CUP, and <i>M. officinalis</i> on Kv2.2 currents. (Aa, Ba, Ca, and Da) Current–voltage relationships of Kv2.2 channel currents in the presence and absence of AMK, PCW, CUP and <i>M. officinalis</i> (Ab, Bb, Cb, and Db). Average concentration dependence of Kv2.2 channel current inhibition by AMK and <i>M. officinalis</i>. However, PCW and CUP had no effect on Kv2.2 channel currents. AMK: <i>Atractylodes macrocephala</i> Koidzumi; PCW: <i>Poria cocos</i> Wolf; CUP: <i>Citrus unshiu</i> peel; <i>M. officinalis</i>: <i>Magnolia officinalis</i> Bark; Kv: Voltage-dependent K<sup>+</sup>