Close
  Indian J Med Microbiol
 

Figure 5: Impairment over behavioral phenotype parameters after the I.P. administration of EB1151 to male mice. (a) General activity, (b) Response to touch, in the second stage of experiment are shown. Kruskall–Wallis statistics (n = 10; ntotal= 40) were used for all the parameters but defecation, which was analyzed. Differences among means after Dunn's multiple comparison tests are given, α<0.05. *P <0.05; **P <0.01

Figure 5: Impairment over behavioral phenotype parameters after the I.P. administration of EB1151 to male mice. (a) General activity, (b) Response to touch, in the second stage of experiment are shown. Kruskall–Wallis statistics (<i>n</i> = 10; <i>n</i><sub>total</sub>= 40) were used for all the parameters but defecation, which was analyzed. Differences among means after Dunn's multiple comparison tests are given, α<0.05. *<i>P</i> <0.05; **<i>P</i> <0.01