Close
  Indian J Med Microbiol
 

Figure 3: Cytotoxicity of Physalis virginiana screened against Artemia salina in concentrations of 10, 100, and 1000 μg/ml. Error bars indicate upper and lower 95% confi dence intervals. Linear regression ANOVA results: (negative control) R2 = 0, Prob > F = 1.000, r = 0.0000. (shoots) R2 = 0.1429, Prob > F = 0.6297, r = 0.1614; (fruits) R2 = 0.5588, Prob > F = 0.0859, r = – 0.1465; (roots) R2 = 0.1, Prob > F = 0.7290, r = – 0.3152; (gentamicin) R2 = 0.9887, Prob > F = <.0001, r = – 0.9934

Figure 3: Cytotoxicity of <i>Physalis virginiana</i> screened against <i>Artemia salina</i> in concentrations of 10, 100, and 1000 μg/ml. Error bars indicate upper and lower 95% confi dence intervals. Linear regression ANOVA results: (negative control) <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0, Prob > <i>F</i> = 1.000, r = 0.0000. (shoots) <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.1429, Prob > <i>F</i> = 0.6297, <i>r</i> = 0.1614; (fruits) <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.5588, Prob > <i>F</i> = 0.0859, <i>r</i> = – 0.1465; (roots) <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.1, Prob > <i>F</i> = 0.7290, r = – 0.3152; (gentamicin) <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.9887, Prob > <i>F</i> = <.0001, <i>r</i> = – 0.9934