Close
  Indian J Med Microbiol
 

Figure 5: Urine oxalate concentration in experimental groups. (A) Control group (n=7), (B)ethylene glycol group (n=8), (C) group treated with aqueous-ethanolic extract of NS (250 mg/kg, n=7), (D) group treated with remnant phase of N-butanol (250 mg/kg, n=7), (E) group treated with N-butanol fraction of NS (250 mg/kg, n=8). Data were expressed as mean ± SEM, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs. group A

Figure 5: Urine oxalate concentration in experimental groups. (A) Control group (n=7), (B)ethylene glycol group (n=8), (C) group treated with aqueous-ethanolic extract of NS (250 mg/kg, n=7), (D) group treated with remnant phase of <i>N</i>-butanol (250 mg/kg, n=7), (E) group treated with <i>N</i>-butanol fraction of NS (250 mg/kg, n=8). Data were expressed as mean ± SEM, *<i>P</i> < 0.05, **<i>P</i> < 0.01, ***<i>P</i> < 0.001 vs. group A