Home | About PM | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact us |  Login 
Pharmacognosy Magazine
Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 14  |  Issue : 58  |  Page : 647-658

Development and evaluation of sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) seed oil nanoemulsion gel for wound healing


Himalayan Center of Excellence in Nanotechnology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Himachal Pradesh, India

Correspondence Address:
Deepak N Kapoor
Himalayan Center of Excellence in Nanotechnology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Post Box No. 9, Solan - 173 212, Himachal Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/pm.pm_375_18

Rights and Permissions

Background: Sea buckthorn (SBT) seed oil is reported to have significant wound-healing activity. However, the oil presents with problems such as poor skin permeation and retention in the deeper layers of skin, as well as leakage, dripping, and spreading during application. These issues can be overcome by formulating nanoemulsion (NE) gel of SBT seed oil. Objective: The present study involves the development of SBT seed oil NE gels for wound healing. Materials and Methods: The NE formulations were prepared by the spontaneous emulsification method. Based on the results of pseudoternary phase diagrams, different NE formulations were prepared using SBT seed oil, surfactant/cosurfactant, and water. The selected NE formulation NEA1 was used to prepare two NE gels containing 0.5% w/w (NG1) and 1% w/w (NG2) of carbopol 940. Results: The optimized formulation NEA1 was selected on the basis of stability and conductivity studies. The NG2 NE gel was selected as the final formulation on the basis of viscosity, spreadability, extrudability, and texture analysis. This optimized NG2 formulation was further evaluated for in vivo wound-healing activity and ex vivo skin penetration studies. A significant improvement was found in NG2-treated group of animals in comparison with SBT seed oil-treated animals w.r.t wound contraction, hydroxyproline, hexosamine content, breaking strength, tensile strength, and epithelialization time of the wound. The optimized formulation also showed improved antibacterial and antifungal activity. Conclusion: The formulated NE gel of SBT seed oil showed better wound-healing, antibacterial, and antifungal activity in comparison to pure SBT seed oil. Abbreviations used: CPCSEA: Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals; DMSO: Dimethyl sulfoxide; FITC: Fluorescein isothiocyanate; FAME: Methyl esters formation of fatty acids; GC: Gas chromatography; IAEC: Institutional Animal Ethics Committee; MIC: Minimum inhibitory concentration; MHA: Mueller-Hinton agar media; MHB: Mueller-Hinton broth; MDS: Mean droplet size; NIPER: National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research; NEs: Nanoemulsions; KOH: Potassium hydroxide; PDI: Polydispersity index; RPMI-1640: Roswell Park Memorial Institute-1640 medium; STZ: Streptozotocin; SBT: Sea buckthorn; Smix: surfactant/cosurfactant; TEA: Triethanolamine; TEM: Transmission electron microscopy; YPD: Yeast extract-peptone-dextrose.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed149    
    Printed7    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded5    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal