Home | About PM | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact us |  Login 
Pharmacognosy Magazine
Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
 


 
  Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 52  |  Page : 553-558  

Evaluating the feasibility of five candidate DNA Barcoding Loci for Philippine Lasianthus Jack (Lasiantheae: Rubiaceae)


1 The Graduate School, University of Santo Tomas, España Blvd., 1015 Manila, Philippines
2 Department of Biological Sciences, Institute of Arts and Sciences, Far Eastern University, Nicanor Reyes Street, Sampaloc, 1008 Manila, Philippines
3 The Graduate School and Research Center for the Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, España Blvd, 1015 Manila, Philippines

Date of Submission02-Jan-2017
Date of Acceptance01-Feb-2017
Date of Web Publication13-Nov-2017

Correspondence Address:
Grecebio Jonathan D Alejandro
Rm. 302, Plant Sciences Laboratory, Research Center for the Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, España Blvd., 1015 Manila
Philippines
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/pm.pm_1_17

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Introduction: The pantropical genus Lasianthus Jack is identified for high phenotypic plasticity making traditional taxonomic identification difficult. Having some members with important medicinal properties, a precise complimentary identification through DNA barcoding is needed for species delineation. Materials and Methods: In this study, 12 samples representing six Philippine Lasianthus species were used to determine the most efficient barcoding loci among the cpDNA markers (matK, rbcL, rps16, and trnT-F) and nrDNA (ITS) based on the criteria of universality, discriminatory power, and resolution of species. Results: The results revealed that ITS has the recommended primer universality, greatest interspecific divergences, and average resolution of species. Among the cpDNA markers, matK and rbcL are recommended but with minimal resolution of species. While trnT-F showed moderate interspecific variations and resolution of Lasianthus species, rps16 has the lowest interspecific divergence and resolution of species. Conclusion: Consequently, ITS is the potential ideal DNA barcode for Lasianthus species.
Abbreviations used: ITS: Internal Transcribe Spacer, matK: maturase K, rbcL: ribulose-1,5-biphospahte-carboxylase, rps16: ribosomal protein 16 small subunit gene.

Keywords: cpDNA, DNA barcoding, Lasianthus, nrDNA, Philippines


How to cite this article:
Arshed MC, Valdez MB, Alejandro GD. Evaluating the feasibility of five candidate DNA Barcoding Loci for Philippine Lasianthus Jack (Lasiantheae: Rubiaceae). Phcog Mag 2017;13:553-8

How to cite this URL:
Arshed MC, Valdez MB, Alejandro GD. Evaluating the feasibility of five candidate DNA Barcoding Loci for Philippine Lasianthus Jack (Lasiantheae: Rubiaceae). Phcog Mag [serial online] 2017 [cited 2017 Nov 17];13:553-8. Available from: http://www.phcog.com/text.asp?2017/13/52/553/218106



Summary

  • ITS, matK, and rps16 markers have the excellent amplification and sequence quality
  • ITS marker has the highest interspecific divergence with the maximum values, followed by matK, rbcL, trnT-F, and rps16, respectively
  • All markers except rps16 yielded average resolution to Lasianthus species
  • ITS marker is the most ideal locus in terms of excellent universality, high interspecific discriminatory ability, and average species resolution.



   Introduction Top


Lasianthus Jack is the largest genus of the four genera comprising the tribe Lasiantheae of family Rubiaceae. The genus consists of about 225 species with the highest diversity in tropical and subtropical Asia.[1]Lasianthus is characterized as drupes with thick wall that develop from the ovaries with 3–9 locules.[2] It represents an ecologically important element specifically in its distribution pattern, which is significant in the field of biogeography and speciation patterns in the assemblage of tropical rainforest.[3] Moreover, Lasianthus exhibits medicinal uses such as Lasianthus lucidus Blume that is used to ease fever, blood loss and has hepatoprotective potential;[4]Lasianthus verticillatus (Lour.) Merr. is traditionally used by the Onges tribe as antidote;[5]Lasianthus oblongus King and Gamble is applied orally to hasten constriction of the organs for postpartum mothers;[6] and other several species of the genus are with known active chemical constituents such as alkaloids, terpenoids, and glycosides (e.g., L. attenuatus Jack, L. fordii Hance, and L. lucidus Blume).[7],[8] Close analysis of literature, protologs, and herbarium specimens reveals uncertainties and difficulties in discriminating Lasianthus species based on morphology. The genus is identified for high phenotypic plasticity making traditional taxonomic identification difficult. Knowing some Lasianthus species exhibits medicinal and pharmaceutical importance; accurate species identification is necessary.

Modern molecular biology tools offer excellent approaches for rapid characterization and precise identification of species. Using short sequences as molecular markers for species-level identification is known as DNA barcoding.[9],[10],[11],[12] Applications of DNA barcoding are enormous especially in scenario where morphological approaches cannot resolve identification in species having sexual dimorphism and phenotypic plasticity within species of the same genus.[13] Several genomic regions were proposed for the plant DNA barcoding and the plant working group of the Consortium for the Barcode of Life (CBOL)[14] recommended using matK and rbcL as the standard barcodes. Aside from using these two markers, additional three markers were utilized in this study, namely (1) rps16, an intron in the single large copy region of the plastid genome[15] that can provide good resolution[16] and has higher divergence than other cpDNA markers;[17] (2) trnT-F, a noncoding chloroplast gene that has high variability and useful for species and genus level resolutions for phylogenetic studies (e.g., family Arecaceae and Rhamnaceae);[18] and (3) ITS, a nuclear locus that has ability to infer closely related genera[19] due to its high repeating units that promote good amplification and sequencing.[20] Moreover, these markers have been utilized in molecular analyses of Lasianthus species.[1],[17] In this paper, five barcoding loci (matK, rbcL, rps16, trnT-F, and ITS) were evaluated for Philippine Lasianthus species to identify the ideal DNA barcode of the genus based on universality, discriminatory ability, and resolution of species.


   Materials and Methods Top


Sampling of plant materials

Collections of Philippine Lasianthus species [Table 1] from the provinces of Antique, Camiguin, Cebu, Davao, Mindoro, and Quezon, Philippines, by the Thomasian Angiosperm Phylogeny and Barcoding Group (TAPBG) of the University of Santo Tomas (UST), Manila, were used in this study. Field images of Lasianthus [Figure 1] and voucher specimens were deposited at the UST Herbarium (USTH) provided with accession numbers [Table 1]. Leaf samples from two different populations were collected and stored in a zip-lock with silica gel.[21] A total of 12 samples representing six Philippine Lasianthus species were used in this study. Seven additional sequences of three Lasianthus species retrieved in the GenBank were used in the analysis [Table 2].
Table 1: Thomasian Angiosperm Phylogeny and Barcoding Group Lasianthus collection used in the study

Click here to view
Figure 1: Field images of some Lasianthus species. Lasianthus fordii Hance: (a) leaves; (b) infructescence; (C) flowers; Lasianthus clementis Merr.: (d) habit; (e) infructescence; (f) fruits

Click here to view
Table 2: Accession numbers of Lasianthus species obtained from National Center for Biotechnology Information-GenBank

Click here to view


DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction amplification, and sequencing

Silica gel-dried leaf samples were used for the extraction of genomic DNA using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen®, Germany) following the manufacturer's protocol. The Biometra T-gradient (Germany) was used for the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. DNA was amplified using KAPA Taq PCR kit (USA). The universal primers and amplification protocol used are listed in [Table 3]. The PCR cocktail of 25 μL reaction for the chloroplast markers (rps16, trnT-F, matK, and rbcL) was as follows: 17.35 μL nuclease free water, 2.5 μL × 10 PCR buffer, 1.0 μL 25 MgCl2, 2.0 μL deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTP), 1.0 μL of 10 μM forward and reverse primers, 0.15 μL Taq DNA polymerase, and 0.5 μL DNA template. For ITS marker, the PCR cocktail of 25 μL reaction was mixed as follows: 15.3 μL nuclease free water, 2.5 μL × 10 PCR buffer, 2.0 μL MgCl2, 1.5 μL dNTP, 1.0 μL of 10 μM forward and reverse primers, 0.2 μL Taq DNA polymerase, and 1.5 μL DNA. The presence of amplified DNA bands was confirmed using 1% concentration of agarose gel with ×1 tris-borate-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid buffer [Figure 2]. Amplified DNA was purified using the QIA-quick Purification Kit (Qiagen®, Germany) and were sent to Macrogen, South Korea, for bidirectional sequencing. DNA sequences were assembled and edited using the Codon Code Aligner v. 4.1.1. (CodonCode Co., USA).
Table 3: Primers used for the amplification of DNA barcodes

Click here to view
Figure 2: Sample of gel autoradiograph showing polymerase chain reaction products (ITS marker)

Click here to view


Sequence analyses

For determining the most effective barcode marker for the discrimination of Lasianthus species, the following conventional barcoding parameters such as mean length of base pair (bp), PCR success rate (%), intra- and inter-specific divergences (%), and the mean sequence divergence in each marker and between the different markers were analyzed using MEGA v. 7.0.14 (Pennsylvania State University), (K2P, Kimura-2-Parameter with pairwise deletion). This was followed by the Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney test to establish if the mean sequence divergence is statistically significant using SPSS 15.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). To assess the resolution of species, percentage was calculated base from the neighbor-joining (NJ) tree that was constructed for further evaluation of markers.


   Results Top


From the five markers, a total of sixty newly sequences of Lasianthus were produced [Appendix 1 [Additional file 1] ]. Sequence characteristics for the five barcode loci are presented in [Table 4] with their overall results. The longest mean length was from trnT-F with 2101 bp followed by rps16, matK, ITS, and rbcL. As for the most parsimonious informative sites, the trnT-F marker was the highest with 164 informative bp from 270 variable sites, followed by ITS, rbcL, and matK. Interestingly, rps16 with the second highest mean bp still fall short for having the least informative characters of 11 from 54 variable sites. Primer universality was determined using the PCR amplification efficiency and sequence quality. PCR amplification was generally 100% successful to all the candidate barcodes. For the sequence quality, ITS, matK, and rps16 exhibited 100% success rates, followed by rbcL with 92% sequencing success and trnT-F with 75% which was the least efficient.
Table 4: Characteristics of the different barcoding loci

Click here to view


Pairwise divergence analyses for each candidate barcodes using the two parameters to characterize the inter- and intra-specific divergences are presented in [Table 5]. The ITS has the highest interspecific divergence (0.1623 ± 0.0810), followed by matK (0.0951 ± 0.0982), trnT-F (0.0621 ± 0.0356), rbcL (0.0563 ± 0.0232), and rps16 (0.0238 ± 0.0376). Results for the intraspecific variations revealed that trnT-F (0.0121 ± 0.0122) has the lowest average in all the parameters, followed by rbcL (0.0155 ± 0.0161), matK (0.0207 ± 0.0172), rps16 (0.0243 ± 0.0469), and ITS (0.0999 ± 0.0613).
Table 5: Inter- and intra-specific divergences among loci

Click here to view


NJ tree was used to generate the topology of Lasianthus species in each candidate barcodes to determine the species resolution. Using BLAST, all of the candidate barcodes were able to classify each species as to genus Lasianthus, but the generated tree for each barcodes was unable to categorize some species to its specific resolutions [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Neighbor-joining bootstrap trees (based on Kimura-2-Parameter) illustrating the resolution of the species for the five barcoding loci: (a) ITS sequences showing 50% species resolution; (b) matK sequences showing 50% species resolution; (c) rbcL sequences showing 67% species resolution; (d) rps16 showing 33% species resolution; (e) trnT-F showing 50% species resolution

Click here to view


None of the markers can completely resolve taxa with closely related species (e.g., L. lucidus, L. fordii, L. verticillatus, L. trichophlebus). Nevertheless, some markers can give better resolution with higher bootstrap (BS) support than other markers used in the study. The rbcL marker followed by matK and trnT-F can resolve some of the difficult species with greater support value. For ITS, it cannot group same species fully just like rps16, but it can generate higher confidence level compared to rps16.


   Discussion Top


A suitable barcode should exhibit the following criteria: (1) high universality (PCR and sequencing success rates), (2) high discriminatory power based on the inter- and intra-specific divergences, and (3) high species resolution.[14] The results of the study were assessed and vis-a-vis against the criteria.

Universality

PCR amplification efficiency and sequence quality: Amplified and generated sequences of the five barcoding loci were evaluated based on the sequence quality that each barcodes produced. ITS, matK, and rps16 markers have the excellent amplification and sequence quality. The rbcL and trnT-F markers yielded successful amplification but less sequencing success rates. Results show that ITS, matK, and rps16 markers are the most universal in terms of quality and coverage of sequences among the barcodes utilized. This corresponds to previous studies[9],[27],[28] that ITS has high amplification [Figure 2] and sequence capabilities. Likewise, the results confirmed matK exhibiting amplification and sequencing efficiency[29],[30],[31] and this was one of the markers recommended by CBOL as a standard barcode in plants. Furthermore, rps16 marker also provides high amplification and sequencing success, indicating its universality as it has been used in discriminating taxonomic uncertainties in Rubiaceae.[32]

Discriminatory: Inter- versus intra-specific genetic divergence

An ideal barcode should exhibit high interspecific divergences but low intraspecific variation.[9],[33],[34] Using the Wilcoxon two-sample tests, significant differences between the inter- and intra-specific divergences of the five candidate barcodes were analyzed [Table 6]. Interspecific differences were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than their related intraspecific divergences. Thus, settled differences exhibited by both specific divergences give a good lead for the discriminatory efficiency of the markers used.
Table 6: Wilcoxon two-sample test for inter- versus intra-specific divergences

Click here to view


In comparison of the five barcodes, ITS maker has the highest interspecific divergence with the maximum values, followed by matK, rbcL, trnT-F, and rps16, respectively [Table 5]. The ITS has the second highest number of variable and informative sites. It also yields the highest interspecific mean which corroborates in other studies.[34],[35] However, results for intraspecific variations revealed that ITS has the highest value, followed by rps16, matK, rbcL, and trnT-F markers. An ideal barcode should have low intraspecific variations which ITS failed to have. Thus, ITS has high discriminatory power on interspecific level as this marker is useful for identification efficiency of closely related species among numerous genera. Furthermore, ITS region is regarded as more varied than any of the chloroplast genes.[36],[37],[38] Results obtained from Wilcoxon signed-rank test [Table 7] support ITS to possess the highest interspecific divergence with almost high significant differences. However, ITS is not a good marker for intraspecific identification of Lasianthus species for having the least intraspecific variations among other barcodes. Consequently, trnT-F should be the ideal barcode for discriminating species for intraspecific level in genus Lasianthus. Furthermore, this marker has the highest number of variable and informative sites. Results obtained using Wilcoxon signed-rank test of intraspecific divergence among loci [Table 8] suggest rps16 as the lowest, followed by trnT-F and matK with equal rank and then rbcL and ITS as the highest. The significant differences were exhibited by rps16 and trnT-F when compared to ITS alone, making the results inconclusive for the ideal barcode for intraspecific level. There should be a significant difference between all the markers to establish the efficiency of the particular marker to discriminate up to intraspecific level.
Table 7: Wilcoxon signed-rank tests of interspecific divergence among loci

Click here to view
Table 8: Wilcoxon signed-rank tests of intraspecific divergence among loci

Click here to view


Resolution of species

Alignments for each barcodes were used to generate phylogenetic analysis using NJ tree to evaluate the species resolution if each barcode can generate taxonomic groupings per species and a monophyletic tree. In addition, the BS values were included to give partial tree reliability for each barcodes. All of the markers have insufficient conspecific groupings [Figure 3] where rbcL has the highest species resolution of only 67%. The ITS, matK, and trnT-F were able to have 50% species resolution and least was from rps16 with 33%. Thus, candidate barcodes used in the study were inadequate for species resolution; nevertheless, inference from this study suggests that most of the barcodes, except for rps16, can give average resolution to Lasianthus species.


   Conclusion Top


This study provides baseline information on the potential barcodes for Philippine Lasianthus species. The ITS marker has the most feasible ideal locus for this genus, having excellent universality, high interspecific discriminatory ability, and average species resolution, which can be supplemented by rbcL and matK. It would be suitable to increase the sample size of Lasianthus species to facilitate more definite results for rapid authentication of Philippine Lasianthus.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the TAPBG collectors, USTH, for granting access to herbarium collections and the Research Center for Natural and Applied Sciences, UST, for the laboratory facility.

Financial support and sponsorship

The present work is part of the graduate thesis of MJCA in which financial grant has been obtained from DOST-Science Education Institute. GJDA thanks DOST-Philippine Council for Health, Research and Development and CHED-Philippine Higher Education Research Network, for the funding.

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Smedmark JE, Razafimandimbison SG, Wikström N, Bremer B. Inferring geographic range evolution of a pantropical tribe in the coffee family (Lasiantheae, Rubiaceae) in the face of topological uncertainty. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2014;70:182-94.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Zhu H. Paralasianthus (Rubiaceae), a new genus from Southeast Asia. Phytotaxa 2015;202:273-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Zhu H, Roos MC, Ridsdale CE. A taxonomic revision of the Malesian species of Lasianthus (Rubiaceae). Blumea Biodivers Evol Biogeogr Plants 2012;57:1-102.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Choudhury KD, Choudhury MD, Baruah MK. Hepatoprotective potential of Lasianthus lucidus leaf extracts against carbon tetrachloride induced liver damage in Swiss albino mice. World J Pharma Pharm Sci 2014;3:1536-47.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Sharief MU. Plants folk medicine of Negrito tribes of Bay Islands. Indian J Tradit Knowl 2007;6:468-76.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Ong HC, Faezah AW, Milow P. Medicinal plants used by the Jah Hut Orang Asli at Kampung Pos Penderas, Pahang, Malaysia. Ethno Med 2012;1:11-5.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Takeda Y, Shimidzu H, Mizuno K, Inouchi S, Masuda T, Hirata E, et al. An iridoid glucoside dimer and a non-glycosidic iridoid from the leaves of Lasianthus wallichii. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 2002;50:1395-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Choudhury KD, Dutta C, Anupam DT. Chemical constituents and biological activities of the genus Lasianthus Jack: A review. Assam Univ J Sci Technol 2010;6:129-38.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Gao T, Yao H, Song J, Zhu Y, Liu C, Chen S. Evaluating the feasibility of using candidate DNA barcodes in discriminating species of the large Asteraceae family. BMC Evol Biol 2010;10:324.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
Yu X, Xie Z, Wu J, Tao J, Xu X. DNA barcoding identification of Kadsurae caulis and Spatholobi caulis based on internal transcribed spacer 2 region and secondary structure prediction. Pharmacogn Mag 2016;12 Suppl 2:S165-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Zhou J, Wang W, Liu M, Liu Z. Molecular authentication of the traditional medicinal plant Peucedanum praeruptorum and its substitutes and adulterants by DNA-barcoding technique. Pharmacogn Mag 2014;10:385-90.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.
Mahadani P, Sharma GD, Ghosh SK. Identification of ethnomedicinal plants (Rauvolfioideae: Apocynaceae) through DNA barcoding from northeast India. Pharmacogn Mag 2013;9:255-63.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.
Chapple DG, Ritchie PA. A retrospective approach to testing the DNA barcoding method. PLoS One 2013;8:e77882.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.
CBOL Plant Working Group. A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:12794-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.
Lee J, Hymowitz T. A molecular phylogenetic study of the subtribe Glycininae (Leguminosae) derived from the chloroplast DNA rps16 intron sequences. Am J Bot 2001;88:2064-73.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    
16.
Marazzi B, Endress PK, Queiroz LP, Conti E. Phylogenetic relationships within Senna (Leguminosae, Cassiinae) based on three chloroplast DNA regions: Patterns in the evolution of floral symmetry and extrafloral nectaries. Am J Bot 2006;93:288-303.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.
Xiao LQ, Zhu H. Paraphyly and phylogenetic relationship in Lasianthus (Rubiaceae) inferred from chloroplast rps16 data. Bot Stud 2007;48:227-32.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Borsch T, Hilu KW, Quand, D, Wilde V, Neihuis C, Barthlott W. Noncoding plastid trnT-F sequences reveal a well resolve phylogeny of basal Angiosperms. J Evol Biol 2003;16:558-76.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Soltis DE, Soltis PS. Choosing an approach and an appropriate gene for phylogenetic analysis. In: Soltis PS, Doyle JJ, editors. Molecular Systematics of Plants. Boston, Massachusetts: Kluwer; 1998. p. 1-42.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Baldwin B, Sanderson MJ, Porter JM, Wojciechowski MF, Donoughe MJ. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: A valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Ann Mo Bot Gard 1995;82:247-77.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Chase MW, Hills HH. Silica gel: An ideal material for preservation of leaf samples for DNA studies. Taxon 1991;40:215-20.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Popp M, Oxelman B. Inferring the history of the polyploid Silene aegaea (Caryophyllaceae) using plastid and homoeologous nuclear DNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2001;20:474-81.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]    
23.
Razafimandimbison SG, Bremer B. Phylogeny and classification of Naucleeae s.l. (Rubiaceae) inferred from molecular (ITS, rBCL, and tRNT-F) and morphological data. Am J Bot 2002;89:1027-41.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G, Bouvet J. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol Biol 1991;17:1105-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]    
25.
Oxelman B, Lidén M, Berglund D. Chloroplast rps16 intron phylogeny of the tribe Sileneae (Caryophyllaceae). Plant Syst Evol 1997;206:393-410.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Kress WJ, Erickson DL. A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: The coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS One 2007;2:e508.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]    
27.
Yao H, Song J, Liu C, Luo K, Han J, Li Y, et al. Use of ITS2 region as the universal DNA barcode for plants and animals. PLoS One 2010;5. pii: e13102.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Gu W, Song J, Cao Y, Sun Q, Yao H, Wu Q, et al. Application of the ITS2 region for barcoding medicinal plants of Selaginellaceae in Pteridophyta. PLoS One 2013;8:E67818.  Back to cited text no. 28
[PUBMED]    
29.
Yu H, Wu K, Song J, Zhu Y, Luo K, Lin Y. Expedient identification of magnoliaceae species by DNA barcoding. Plant Omics 2014;7:47-53.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Cabelin VL, Santor PJ, Alejandro GJ. Evaluation of DNA barcoding efficiency of cpDNA barcodes in selected Philippine Leea L. (Vitaceae). Acta Bot Gallica 2015;162:317-3.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Cabelin VL, Alejandro GJ. Efficiency of matK, rbcL, trnH-psbA, and trnL-F (cpDNA) to molecularly authenticate Philippine ethnomedicinal Apocynaceae through DNA barcoding. Pharmacogn Mag 2016;12 Suppl 3:S384-8.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Shaw J, Lickey EB, Beck JT, Farmer SB, Liu W, Miller J, et al. The tortoise and the hare II: Relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Am J Bot 2005;92:142-66.  Back to cited text no. 32
[PUBMED]    
33.
Lahaye R, van der Bank M, Bogarin D, Warner J, Pupulin F, Gigot G, et al. DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:2923-8.  Back to cited text no. 33
[PUBMED]    
34.
Li HQ, Chen JY, Wang S, Xiong SZ. Evaluation of six candidate DNA barcoding loci in Ficus (Moraceae) of China. Mol Ecol Resour 2012;12:783-90.  Back to cited text no. 34
[PUBMED]    
35.
Chase MW, Salamin N, Wilkinson M, Dunwell J, Kesanakurthi RP, Haidar N, et al. Land plants and DNA barcodes: Short-term and long-term goals. Philos Trans R Soc Biol Sci 2005;360:1889-95.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Chase MW, Cowan RS, Hollingsworth PM, van den Berg C, Madriñán S, Petersen G, et al. A proposal for a standardized protocol to barcode all land plants. Taxon 2007;56:295-9.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Roy S, Tyagi A, Shukla V, Kumar A, Singh UM, Chaudhary LB, et al. Universal plant DNA barcode loci may not work in complex groups: A case study with Indian berberis species. PLoS One 2010;5:e13674.  Back to cited text no. 37
[PUBMED]    
38.
Liu Y, Zhang L, Liu Z, Luo K, Chen S, Chen K. Species identification of Rhododendron (Ericaceae) using the chloroplast deoxyribonucleic acid PsbA-trnH genetic marker. Pharmacogn Mag 2012;8:29-36.  Back to cited text no. 38
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7], [Table 8]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed36    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal