|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 43 | Page : 657-664
Quantification of maltol in Korean ginseng ( Panax ginseng) products by high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detector
Hyun Cheol Jeong, Hee-Do Hong, Young-Chan Kim, Young Kyoung Rhee, Sang Yoon Choi, Kyung-Tack Kim, Sung Soo Kim, Young-Chul Lee, Chang-Won Cho
Ginseng Research Center, Food Research Institute, Seongnam, Gyeonggi 463-746, Korea
|Date of Submission||16-Jul-2014|
|Date of Acceptance||13-Aug-2015|
|Date of Web Publication||10-Jul-2015|
Ginseng Research Center, Food Research Institute, Seongnam, Gyeonggi 463-746
Source of Support: This work was supported by research grants from the Korea Food Research Institute (Project No. E0132202), Conflict of Interest: None declared.
| Abstract|| |
Background: Maltol, as a type of phenolic compounds, is produced by the browning reaction during the high temperature treatment of ginseng. Thus, maltol can be used as a marker for the quality control of various ginseng products manufactured by high temperature treatment including red ginseng. For the quantification of maltol in Korean ginseng products, an effective high performance liquid chromatography diode array detector (HPLC DAD) method was developed. Materials and Methods: The HPLC DAD method for maltol quantification coupled with a liquid liquid extraction (LLE) method was developed and validated in terms of linearity, precision, and accuracy. An HPLC separation was performed on a C18 column. Results: The LLE methods and HPLC running conditions for maltol quantification were optimized. The calibration curve of the maltol exhibited good linearity (R2 = 1.00). The limit of detection value of maltol was 0.26 μg/mL, and the limit of quantification value was 0.79 μg/mL. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) of the data of the intra and inter day experiments were <1.27% and 0.61%, respectively. The results of the recovery test were 101.35–101.75% with an RSD value of 0.21–1.65%. The developed method was applied successfully to quantify the maltol in three ginseng products manufactured by different methods. Conclusion: The results of validation demonstrated that the proposed HPLC DAD method was useful for the quantification of maltol in various ginseng products.
Keywords: High performance liquid chromatography diode array detector, maltol, Panax ginseng, quantification, validation
|How to cite this article:|
Jeong HC, Hong HD, Kim YC, Rhee YK, Choi SY, Kim KT, Kim SS, Lee YC, Cho CW. Quantification of maltol in Korean ginseng ( Panax ginseng) products by high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detector. Phcog Mag 2015;11:657-64
|How to cite this URL:|
Jeong HC, Hong HD, Kim YC, Rhee YK, Choi SY, Kim KT, Kim SS, Lee YC, Cho CW. Quantification of maltol in Korean ginseng ( Panax ginseng) products by high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detector. Phcog Mag [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 May 24];11:657-64. Available from: http://www.phcog.com/text.asp?2015/11/43/657/160452
| Introduction|| |
Korean ginseng (Panax ginseng Meyer), a traditional herbal medicine, belongs to the family Araliaceae within the genus Panax. It is mainly cultivated in Korea, China, and Eastern Siberia. Currently, ginseng products in the market can be largely classified as fresh ginseng and processed products, dried ginseng (DG) and red ginseng (RG). DG is manufactured by simple drying process of fresh ginseng, but RG is manufactured by steaming and drying process of fresh ginseng. Various Korean ginseng products have been reported to have many beneficial effects such as anti tumor, anti diabetic, immunostimulatory, anti oxidant, and protection against gastric damage. The major bioactive substances of ginseng are ginsenosides, polyacetylenes, phenolic compounds, alkaloids, acidic polysaccharides, and amino acids.
Among major bioactive substances of ginseng, maltol, which is type of phenolic compounds, exists in a very small amount in fresh ginseng or DG but in high concentrations in RG. Maltol has been reported to have anti oxidative effects and to inhibit aging related lipid peroxidation. Maltol is produced by the browning reaction during the high temperature treatment of ginseng. Therefore, maltol tends to increase in ginseng products processed by high temperature and high pressure (HTHP), including RG processed by hot steam. Thus, maltol can be used as a marker compound for the quality control of various ginseng products manufactured by high temperature treatment including RG. Several analytical methods for the detection of maltol in ginseng have been reported to date. Selective ion monitoring mode for gas chromatography/mass spectrometry was used for maltol analysis in RG. The most common method for the identification and quantification of maltol in RG involves a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system combined with diode array detector (DAD)., In case of HTHP RG, however, HTHP process resulted in various unidentified compounds production. Therefore, it is very hard to separate and quantify maltol exactly in HTHP RG.
This study was conducted to develop improved and validated HPLC DAD method for the quantification of maltol in various ginseng products, especially in HTHP ginseng product.
| Materials and methods|| |
Materials and chemicals
A 4 year old fresh P. ginseng was obtained from a ginseng market in Korea (Seoul, Korea). HPLC grade water, acetonitrile, and methanol were obtained from J. T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ, USA), and other solvents and reagents of analytical grade were procured. Maltol standard was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Preparation of ginseng products
All of the ginseng products were prepared after washing and removing the rootlets of fresh ginseng. The DG was prepared by hot air drying at 50°C for 5 days. The RG was prepared by steaming the ginseng at 95°C for 3 h, followed by hot air drying at 50°C for 48 h. HTHP RG was made by drying at 50°C for 36 h followed by autoclaving at 140°C (3 kg/cm2) for 20 min, and then hot air drying at 50°C. Ginseng products prepared by different manufacturing methods (DG, RG, and HTHP RG) are presented in [Figure 1]. The moisture content of the final products was reduced to <15%, which is within the inspection criterion that is defined in the domestic ginseng related regulations.
|Figure 1: Ginseng products prepared by different preparation methods. Dried ginseng (a), red ginseng (RG) (b), and high-temperature and high-pressure-RG (c)|
Click here to view
Sample preparation for high-performance liquid chromatography analysis
One gram of HTHP RG powder was extracted using 20 mL of 80% methanol at 80°C for 1 h. The samples were re extracted by the same method and then filtered with an 8 μm filter paper (Whatman, Maidstone, UK) for vacuum concentration. After the sample was completely concentrated, it was dissolved in 5 mL of HPLC methanol and filtered using a 0.2 μm polyvinyl difluoride (PVDF) syringe filter (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) for HPLC analysis.
Liquid liquid extraction
Dried ginseng, RG, and HTHP RG powder (1 g each) were extracted using 20 mL of 80% methanol at 80°C for 1 h. The samples were re extracted by the same method and then filtered with an 8 μm filter paper (Whatman) for vacuum concentration. After the samples were concentrated until only the water was left, 10 mL of water and 10 mL of ethyl acetate were added. The samples were then separated as layers, and the supernatant (ethyl acetate layer) was decanted into the evaporation flask. Another 10 mL of ethyl acetate was added to the water layer, after which the extraction was repeated. The ethyl acetate layer from the two extractions was then combined and subjected to vacuum concentration. The DG extract was dissolved in 5 mL of HPLC methanol and filtered using a 0.2 μm PVDF syringe filter (Waters) for HPLC analysis.
Preparation of standard stock solution
Standard stock solutions of maltol were prepared by dissolving 1 mg of maltol standard in 1 mL methanol. The analytical working solutions were prepared by diluting this stock solution with methanol. These working solutions were used for the calibration curves and validation of the proposed method. The stock solutions were stored at 4°C.
High-performance liquid chromatography analysis
Analysis of the maltol was conducted in a Jasco (Tokyo, Japan) HPLC system with PU 2089 Plus gradient pump equipped with a degasser, an AS 2075 Plus autosampler, and a MD 2010 Plus DAD. Data were collected with the Jasco Chrompass Software. Comparative analysis was carried out using a SunFire (Waters) C18 column (particle size: 5 μm, id: 4.6 mm, length: 250 mm). The mobile phase consisting of eluent of A (2% acetic acid in water) and B (0.5% acetic acid in acetonitrile) was run at 1.2 mL/min. The linear gradient elution program was set as follows: 100% A at 0–20 min, 100–97% A at 20–24 min, and 10% A at 24–30 min. The eluted maltol was detected at 274 nm. The injection volume was 10 μL, and the column temperature was maintained at 40°C.
The HPLC method was validated in terms of linearity, precision, and accuracy according to the guidelines of the International Conference on the Harmonization of Technical Requirements for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use.,
Linearity, limit of detection and limit of quantification
To obtain a calibration curve for the linearity evaluation, the maltol standard material was diluted stepwise to five concentrations using methanol, and HPLC analysis was performed 12 times. A linear regression equation (y = ax + b; a = slope, b = y intercept, x = sample concentration, y = peak area) was calculated, and linearity was confirmed through the correlation coefficient (R2).
The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were measured to examine the lowest concentration of analytic samples for possible detection and quantification. The LOD and LOQ were calculated through the calibration curve and measured at signal to noise ratio of 3 and 10, respective
The precision of the method was evaluated by repetitive testing, intra day and inter day. The intra day variability test was performed to check the degree of changes in results caused by a varying experimental environment in the same sample. Intra day variability was evaluated by obtaining the relative standard deviation (RSD) through five repetitive measurements of samples with three different concentrations within the concentration with confirmed linearity. The inter day variability was evaluated by calculating the RSD through five repetitive experiments and by changing the experiment dates on the 1st, 3rd, and 5th day based on three different concentrations within the concentration with confirmed linearity. The RSD was taken as the measurement of precision: RSD (%) = (standard deviation/mean measured amount) ×100. The appropriate RSD value for precision is within 3%.
To evaluate the accuracy, the DG samples with known concentration were spiked with different concentrations of maltol standard solution and subsequently extracted, and the recovery was calculated. The recovery of the added standard was calculated by the following equation: Recovery (%) = (amount found – original amount)/amount spiked × 100. The ideal range of recovery was 90–110%.
Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical comparison was performed using a One way analysis of variance test followed by Duncan’s multiple range tests. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
| Results and discussion|| |
Optimization of high-performance liquid chromatography condition
For the analysis of maltol in HTHP RG, an HTHP RG extract was analyzed by the previous HPLC method developed for the analysis of maltol in RG. As exhibited in [Figure 2]a, maltol (Retention time: 19.4 min) was not completely separated from the previous peak (19.1 min). To obtain chromatograms with good separation of maltol in HTHP RG, we modified the previous HPLC method in terms of the elution condition and flow rate. As exhibited in [Figure 2b], the maltol (20.1 min) peak was well separated from the peak that appeared at 18.8 min. This result suggests that the developed HPLC DAD method separates maltol without any interference.
|Figure 2: High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) chromatograms of high-temperature and high-pressure red ginseng sample assayed by the previous HPLC method (a), and the modified HPLC method for maltol analysis (b). An HPLC separation was performed on a C18 column|
Click here to view
Optimization of the extraction method
The chromatograms obtained by HPLC using the two different sample preparation methods under the selected chromatographic conditions are presented in [Figure 3]. As displayed in the results, foreign material was confirmed to have been mixed in the maltol peak in the direct extraction (DE) method [Figure 3a], but such foreign material was eliminated in the liquid liquid extraction (LLE) method [Figure 3b]. The DE method is considered to be a simple, less time consuming method than LLE. However, this co extraction with other components of the matrix can occur during the DE process, thus lowering its selectivity. As such, this study decided to use the LLE method as an extraction method for maltol analysis.
|Figure 3: High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) elution profiles obtained using two different sample preparation methods. High-temperature and high-pressure red ginseng sample for HPLC analysis was prepared by direct extraction method (a), and liquid-liquid extraction method (b). An HPLC separation was performed on a C18 column|
Click here to view
The experiments were performed using various concentrations of methanol (0, 50, 80, and 100%) for the optimization of extraction solvent. The results indicated that 80% methanol extraction demonstrated the highest maltol content [Figure 4]. Thus, 80% methanol was selected for the optimal solvent for LLE extraction.
|Figure 4: Extraction efficiencies of maltol as a function of extraction solvent concentration in high-temperature and high-pressure red ginseng (HTHP-RG) sample. HTHP-RG sample for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis was prepared by liquid-liquid extraction method. An HPLC separation was performed on a C18 column. Values represent the mean of the intra-day (n = 3) analyses ± standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05)|
Click here to view
Linearity, limit of detection, and limit of quantification
The stock solution of the maltol was diluted with methanol to come up with five concentrations. To establish the calibration curve, standard solutions of five different concentrations were analyzed 12 times. The correlation coefficient values of the maltol exhibited good linearity (R2 = 1.00). The LOD value of the maltol was 0.26 μg/mL, and its LOQ value was 0.79 μg/mL [Table 1].
The RSD values of the intra day and inter day tests for maltol were 0.49–1.27% and 0.08–0.61%, respectively, with accuracy ranges of 99.93–100.04% for the intra day test and 99.38–100.46% for the inter day test [Table 2]. These results indicate that this method demonstrates good precision.
In the results of the recovery rate, maltol ranged from 101.35% to 101.75%, RSD 0.21–1.65%. Based on the results of the recovery test, the analysis method used for the maltol of the ginseng sample exhibited excellent accuracy [Table 3]. [Figure 4] presents the difference in the chromatograms between the standard [Figure 5]a, blank DG sample [Figure 5b], and spiked DG sample [Figure 5c].
|Figure 5: High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) chromatograms for the determination of maltol in dried ginseng (DG) sample. Standard solution (a), blank DG sample (b), and spiked DG sample (c). Blank DG and spiked DG samples for HPLC analysis were prepared by liquid-liquid extraction method. An HPLC separation was performed on a C18 column|
Click here to view
Analysis of maltol in various ginseng products
The three ginseng products prepared by different manufacturing methods were analyzed using the developed HPLC DAD method. The maltol content was calculated from the calibration curve of the standards. The amounts of maltol in the three ginseng products are displayed in [Table 4]. The maltol contents in the assayed samples were found to be significantly different. In particular, the HTHP RG exhibited the highest maltol content. This result suggests that the amount of maltol in ginseng was influenced by the HTHP treatment. Maltol is formed by thermal degradation of starch or pyrolysis of sucrose. During the heating process of ginseng, amino acid compounds take browning reaction with maltose to produce 4 O α D glucosyl 1 deoxy 2,3 diketosaccharide. Since this compound is unstable, 2 ketone group and C 6 hydroxyl group condensate to be glycoside B. After that, glycoside B takes further hydrolysis of glucose and rearrangement to be maltol. Therefore, it was considered that extensive heating treatment for HTHP RG may accelerate the increase of maltol than DG or RG. This was consistent with the finding in the previous study wherein the changes in the maltol content in ginseng treated by HTHP (puffed RG) were analyzed using a gas chromatography mass selective detector. In that study, the maltol content of HTHP RG was higher compared to that of the general RG.
| Conclusion|| |
Health functional foods based on ginseng contain various active compounds, and these active compounds compositions are changed by processing methods. Thus, it is important to conduct regular quality control to show its physiological efficacy and effects in health functional foods consistently. In this study, we developed the HPLC DAD method for the detection of maltol in various ginseng products. Optimization of the extraction method and HPLC conditions was performed. Validation of the method was accomplished in terms of linearity, precision, and accuracy. The results of the validation demonstrated that this method offers good linearity, precision, and accuracy. The developed assay method was applied successfully to quantify the maltol in three ginseng products manufactured by different methods. Thus, this analytical method is considered to be usable when maltol is used as a marker for the quality control of various ginseng products such as RG manufactured under the HTHP treatment condition. It may also be used in studies on the correlation between the maltol content in ginseng products and physiological activities.
| Acknowledgments|| |
This work was supported by research grants from the Korea Food Research Institute (Project No. E0132202).
| References|| |
Lee Y, Kim KT, Kim SS, Hur J, Ha SK, Cho CW, et al
. Inhibitory effects of ginseng seed on melanin biosynthesis. Pharmacogn Mag 2014;10:S272 5.
Cho CW, Kim YC, Kang JH, Rhee YK, Choi SY, Kim KT, et al
. Characteristic study on the chemical components of Korean curved ginseng products. J Ginseng Res 2013;37:349 54.
Kim HJ, Cho CW, Hwang JT, Son N, Choi JH, Shim GS, et al
. LC MS based metabolomic analysis of serum and livers from red ginseng fed rats. J Ginseng Res 2013;37:371 8.
Bachran C, Bachran S, Sutherland M, Bachran D, Fuchs H. Saponins in tumor therapy. Mini Rev Med Chem 2008;8:575 84.
Xie JT, Mchendale S, Yuan CS. Ginseng and diabetes. Am J Chin Med 2005;33:397 404.
Sohn SH, Kim SK, Kim YO, Kim HD, Shin YS, Yang SO, et al
comparison of antioxidant activity of Korean White and Red Ginsengs on H2O2 induced oxidative stress in HepG2 hepatoma cells. J Ginseng Res 2013;37:442 50.
Yeo M, Kim DK, Cho SW, Hong HD. Ginseng, the root of Panax ginseng
C.A. Meyer, protects ethanol induced gastric damages in rat through the induction of cytoprotective heat shock protein 27. Dig Dis Sci 2008;53:606 13.
Attele AS, Wu JA, Yuan CS. Ginseng pharmacology: Multiple constituents and multiple actions. Biochem Pharmacol 1999;58:1685 93.
Lee YS, Im DH, Yang JC, Noh DS, Kim KI, Oh SK, et al
. Study on the qualitative discrimination of white, red, and black ginseng extract. Korean J Food Nutr 2011;24:138 43.
Choi HJ, Zhang YB, Bae MJ, Choi C. Identification of biologically active compounds from Panax ginseng
C. A. Meyer. Korean J Food Sci Technol 2002;34:493 7.
Lee SJ, Moon TW, Lee J. Increases of 2 furanmethanol and maltol in Korean red ginseng during explosive puffing process. J Food Sci 2010;75:C147 51.
Cho HJ, Yoo DC, Cho HN, Fan LA, Kim HJ, Khang KW, et al
. Analysis of phytochemicals in popular medicinal herbs by HPLC and GC MS. Korean J Food Sci Technol 2008;40:277 82.
Jung KH, Hong HD, Cho CW, Lee MY, Choi UK, Kim YC. Phenolic acid composition and antioxidative activity of red ginseng prepared by high temperature and high pressure process. Korean J Food Nurt 2012;25:827 32.
Manufacturing standards for ginseng products, Law for Ginseng Industry, No. 12417. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Korea; 2014.
Cheng X, Wang D, Jiang L, Yang D. Simultaneous determination of eight bioactive alkaloids in Corydalis
saxicola by high performance liquid chromatography coupled with diode array detection. Phytochem Anal 2008;19:420 8.
Jeong HC, Shim YS, Rhee YK, Choi SY, Hong HD, Chung J, et al
. Quantification of marker compounds in Cirsium setidens
Nakai by HPLC DAD. Food Sci Biotechnol 2013;22:1481 6.
Hong HD, Sim EM, Kim KT, Rho J, Rhee YK, Cho CW. Comparison of preparation methods for the quantification of ginsenosides in raw Korean ginseng. Food Sci Biotechnol 2009;18:565 9.
Sabbioni C, Ferranti A, Bugamelli F, Forti GC, Raggi MA. Simultaneous HPLC analysis, with isocratic elution, of glycyrrhizin and glycyrrhetic acid in liquorice roots and confectionery products. Phytochem Anal 2006;17:25 31.
Li XG. Studies on the transforming mechanism of amino acid components in ginseng in the course of ginseng processing. Korean J. Ginseng Sci. 1992;16:64 7.
Kim DK, Baik MY, Kim HK, Hahm YT, Kim BY. Standardization of ginseng processing for maximizing the phytonurtrients of ginseng. Food Sci Biotechnol 2013;22 Suppl: 221 6.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]