|Year : 2014 | Volume
| Issue : 39 | Page : 241-248
LC-MS/MS determination and pharmacokinetics study of puerarin and daidzein in rat plasma after oral administration of Gegenqinlian decoction and Radix Puerariae extract
Yifan Zhang1, Jin Yuan2, Ying Wang2, Yue Wang2, Rui An2, Xinhong Wang2
1 Department of Chemistry, School of Chinese Materia Medica, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Department of Pharmacy, Institute of Health Science, Shanghai - 201 318, China
2 Department of Chemistry, School of Chinese Materia Medica, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
|Date of Submission||18-May-2013|
|Date of Acceptance||05-Jul-2013|
|Date of Web Publication||24-Jul-2014|
No. 1200, Cailun Road, Shanghai - 201 203
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background: Gegenqinlian decoction (GQD) is a famous traditional medicine recipe. It is composed of four herbs including Radix Puerariae (GG), Radix Scutellariae (HQ), Rhizoma Coptidis (HL) and Radix Glycyrrhizae (GC), which is widely used for treating gastro-intestinal disorders in the clinical practice of Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of puerarin and daidzein in rats following oral administration of Gegenqinlian Decoction and Radix puerariae extract. Thus, a sensitive and selective liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated for simultaneous determination of puerarin and daidzein in rat plasma following oral administration of Gegenqinlian Decoction and Radix Puerariae extract. Materials and Methods: Chromatographic separation was performed on a Shiseido CAPCELL PAK C 18 analytical column (100 mm × 2.0 mm i.d., 5 μm) by linear gradient elution, with water (0.1% formic acid)-acetonitrile (0.1% formic acid) as mobile phase. Detection was carried out by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode using electrospray ionization in the positive ion mode. Results: The calibration curves were linear over a range of 7.80-1560 ng/mL for puerarin and 6.30-1260 ng/mL for daidzein. The intra- and inter-day precision values were less than 13.6% and their average recoveries was in the range of 77.8% and 88.6% for puerarin and was between 76.3 and 86.8% for daidzein, respectively. Conclusion: The validated method was applied to the comparative pharmacokinetic studies of puerarin and daidzein after oral administration of Gegenqinlian Decoction and Radix Puerariae extract. The pharmacokinetic parameters showed that puerarin and daidzein from Gegenqinlian Decoction were absorbed more effectively with slower elimination in rat plasma than that from Radix Puerariae extract. These results revealed that as far as the Radix Puerariae extract was concerned, it is very valuable to be used as a clinical directions of Gegenqinlian Decoction.
Keywords: Daidzein, gegenqinlian decoction, liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry, pharmacokinetics, puerarin, Radix Puerariae
|How to cite this article:|
Zhang Y, Yuan J, Wang Y, Wang Y, An R, Wang X. LC-MS/MS determination and pharmacokinetics study of puerarin and daidzein in rat plasma after oral administration of Gegenqinlian decoction and Radix Puerariae extract. Phcog Mag 2014;10:241-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Zhang Y, Yuan J, Wang Y, Wang Y, An R, Wang X. LC-MS/MS determination and pharmacokinetics study of puerarin and daidzein in rat plasma after oral administration of Gegenqinlian decoction and Radix Puerariae extract. Phcog Mag [serial online] 2014 [cited 2020 Apr 6];10:241-8. Available from: http://www.phcog.com/text.asp?2014/10/39/241/137363
| Introduction|| |
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formula, which is prescribed in combinations that are aimed either to obtain synergistic effects or to reduce possible adverse reactions. Pharmacokinetic studies could help greatly in understanding and confirming the efficacy and action mechanism of drugs as well as optimizing benefit and reducing harm.  Therefore, it is valuable to perform pharmacokinetic studies to evaluate the rationality and compatibility of TCM formula.
Gegenqinlian Decoction (GQD) is a famous traditional medicine recipe and was first described in Shang Han Lun, a treatise on exogenous febrile diseases written by the famous Chinese physician Zhang Zhongjing (150 to 219 A.D. in the Chinese Eastern Han Dynasty). It is composed of four herbs including Radix Puerariae lobatae, Radix Scutellariae, Rhizoma Coptidis and Radix Glycyrrhizae. Gegenqinlian Decoction has been used to treat gastro-intestinal disorders  in the clinical practice of TCM with a long history. Recent pharmacological studies have demonstrated that Gegenqinlian Decoction has a variety of therapeutic effects. It has bacteriostatic and anti-diarrhea effect,  and it also has anti-inflammatory effects,  antipyretic  and anti-hyperglycemic properties. 
Radix Puerariae (GG) is a well-known TCM acts as the emperor herb in Gegenqinlian Decoction to treat inflammation, fever, hepatitis, allergic diseases and hypertension. , Puerarin and daidzein are the major bioactive isoflavonoids isolated from the roots of Radix Puerariae. Puerarin is used as a phytochemical marker for the quality control of Radix Puerariae in the Chinese pharmacopoeia and daidzein is also a major isoflavonoid. It has been reported that recent investigations reveal that puerarin shows antioxidant and neuro-protective activities, antihyperglycemic effects. , Daidzein also shows anti-thrombotic, anti-allergic, antioxidant and anti-diabetic activities. , Their chemical structures are shown in [Figure 1].
|Figure 1: Chemical structures of puerarin (a), daidzein (b) and internal standard naringin (c)|
Click here to view
Up until now, the separation and quantification of puerarin and daidzein in Radix Puerariae or related preparations have been reported by using capillary electrophoresis (CE),  high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), ,,, near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)  micellar electrokinetic chromatography,  flow injection chemiluminescence (FIC),  high-performance capillary electrophoresis (HPCE)  etc. Nevertheless, these methods above were not sensitive enough for pharmacokinetic studies. To improve sensitivity in vivo studies, Liu et al., developed a on-line Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) coupled with ultra high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) with fluorescence detection method for the determination of puerarin and daidzein in human urine and serum.  Wang et al., evaluated puerarin and daidzein in rat plasma following administration of Gegenqinlian Decoction using ultra-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS).  However, there was no comparative studies on pharmacokinetics of puerarin and daidzein on the prescription to analyze the mechanism of the combination. In this paper, a sensitive and selective method of liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is presented for the simultaneous determination of puerarin and daidzein in rat plasma. This assay was then applied to an inter-comparsion pharmacokinetic study of the two constituents after oral administration of Gegenqinlian Decoction and Radix Puerariae extract to rats.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Materials and reagents
The reference standards of puerarin, daidzein and internal standard of naringin with a purity of over 98.0% were all obtained from the National Institute for Control of Pharmaceutical and Biological Products (Beijing, China). Acetonitrile, methanol and formic acid of HPLC grade were purchased from Tedia Company Inc (Beijing, China). Purified water was prepared using a Milli Q-plus system (Millipore, Billerica, USA), the other reagents were of analytical grade. Radix Puerariae lobatae, Radix Scutellaria, Radix Coptidis and Radix Glycyrrhizae were all purchased from Kangqiao Medicinal Materials Electuary Co. Ltd (Shanghai, China).
Instruments and analytical conditions
The LC-MS/MS analyses were carried out with a Shimadzu liquid chromatography system and a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer API 3200. The HPLC system consisted of Shimadzu liquid chromatography system (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan), equipped with two LC-20AD pumps, a SIL-HTC auto-sampler and an online DGU-20A3 vacuum degasser. Chromatographic separation was carried out on a Shiseido CAPCELL PAK C 18 column (100 mm × 2.0 mm i.d., 5 μm) coupled with a Phenomenex C 18 ( 4.0 mm × 3.0 mm i.d., 5 μm) guard column at room temperature. The mobile phase consisted of water with 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (B), A linear gradient at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min B was run at 18% over 0-1 min, 18-55% over 1-3 min, 55-85% over 3-7 min and maintained at 85% for 1 min and then returned to initial condition. The samples were kept at 4°C in the auto-sampler and a volume of 10μL was injected onto the HPLC system.
Mass spectrometric detection was performed on a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer API 3200 (Applied Biosystems/MDS Sciex, Toronto, Canada) equipped with a turbo ion spray source operated in the positive ionization mode. The MS operating conditions were optimized as follows: The ion spray voltage was set at 2 KV and the source temperature was maintained at 450°C; The collision energy for puerarin, daidzein and naringin was set at 35, 35 and 23 V, respectively. Nitrogen was used as the collision gas. The flow rates of the curtain gas, nebulizer gas1 and gas2 were set at 12, 8, 12 L/min, respectively. The operation of the LC-MS/MS and data analysis were performed using the analyst 1.4 software (Applied Biosystems/MDS Sciex, Toronto, Canada).Quantification was obtained by using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode of the transitions at m/z 417.1 → 296.9 for puerarin, at m/z 255.2 → 199.0 for daidzein and at m/z 581.4 → 273.0 for naringin (IS) respectively.
Preparation of Gegenqinlian decoction and Radix Puerariae extract
Pieces of Radix Puerariae 30.0 g, Radix Scutellaria 18.0 g, Radix Coptidis 18.0 g and Radix Glycyrrhizae 12.0 gm were mixed and decocted twice with water (800 mL and then 600 mL) for 1 h.The extracted solution was concentrated to 78 mL to obtain Gegenqinlian Decoction. Radix Puerariae 30.0 gm was decocted with water as the same manner above for 1h and the extracted solution was concentrated to 30 mL to obtain Radix Puerariae extract. To calculate the administration dose, the contents of puerarin and daidzein in Gegenqinlian Decoction and Radix Puerariae extract were determined by LC-MS/MS described in this paper. The contents of puerarin and daidzein were 4.86 and 0.29 mg/g in Gegenqinlian Decoction and 10.75 and 0.61 mg/gm in Radix Puerariae extract, respectively.
Preparation of the standard and quality control samples
Stock solutions of puerarin, daidzein and naringin (IS) were prepared by dissolving the accurately weighed reference compounds in methanol. A series of working solutions at concentrations over 7.80-1560 ng/mL for puerarin, 6.30-1260 ng/mL for daidzein and 100 ng/mL for naringin were obtained by diluting the stock solutions with the mixture of methanol and water (1:1, v/v). All solutions were stored at 4°C.
Calibration standards of puerarin (7.80, 23.4, 78.0, 312.0, 624.0, 780.0 and 1560 ng/mL) and daidzein (6.30, 18.9, 63.0, 252.0, 504.0, 630.0 and 1260 ng/mL) were prepared by spiking the blank rat plasma (100 μL) with 10 μL of standard working solutions. Quality control (QC) samples were prepared in the same way at concentrations corresponding to 23.4, 312.0 and 780.0 ng/mL for puerarin and 18.9, 252.0 and 630.0 ng/mL for daidzein.
Male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats weighing 220-240 gm were supplied by Sino-British Sippr/BK Lab Animal Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The rats were maintained in an air-conditioned animal quarter at a temperature of 22 ± 2°C and a relative humidity of 50 ± 10%, free access to water and feeding with a laboratory rodent chow (Shanghai, China). All the experimental procedures had been approved by the University Ethics Committee for the use of experimental animals and all animal studies were carried out according to the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
Twelve rats were divided into two groups randomly (n = 6) and after oral administration of Gegenqinlian Decoction of 15.0 g/kg of rat weight (containing 72.90 mg/g for puerarin and 4.35 mg/g for daidzein) and Radix Puerariae extract at a dose of 7.0 g/kg (containing 75.25 mg/g for puerarin and 4.27 mg/g for daidzein) to rats. Blood samples (300 μL) were collected from the suborbital vein prior to dosage (0 min) and at 0.083, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 12.0, 24.0 and 32.0 h, thereafter. The blood samples were immediately transferred to heparinized tubes and centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 5 min. The plasma samples obtained were stored at −20°C until analysis.
Rat plasma 100 µL was mixed with 10 µL internal standard solution (naringin, 1.03 µg/mL) 350 µL hydrochloric acid (0.5 mol/L) and 1 mL ethyl acetate in an eppendorf tube, after vortex-mixing 3 min and centrifugation for 12,000 rpm for 5 min, the supernatant was separated out and blown to dryness with nitrogen at 37°C. Then the residue was reconstituted in 100 µL mobile phase and a 10 µL aliquot of the final testing samples was injected onto the LC-MS/MS system for analysis.
Following the bio-analytical method validation guidance (FDA, 2001), the analytical method was validated to demonstrate the specificity, linearity, precision and accuracy, recovery, matrix effects and stability of samples. Specificity was assessed by a comparison of the chromatograms from blank plasma with those obtained from the corresponding plasma spiked with puerarin, daidzein and IS and plasma samples after the oral administration of Gegenqinlian Decoction and Radix Puerariae extract. Linearity was obtained by plotting the measured peak area ratios of analytes to IS. Calibration curves representing peak area ratios versus analyte concentrations were described in the form of y = a + bx (weighing factor 1/x).The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), defined as the lowest concentration at which both precision and accuracy were less than or equal to 20%, was evaluated by analyzing samples in six replicates.The intra-day and inter-day precision and accuracy were evaluated from the results of QC samples. Five replicates of QC samples at three concentration levels (low, medium and high concentrations) were determined on the same day and on three consecutive validation days, respectively. Precision was expressed as the relative standard deviation (RSD in %) and accuracy was expressed by (mean measured concentration/spiked concentration) × 100%. The extraction recoveries of puerarin and daidzein at three QC levels were measured in a set of six replicates by comparing the peak areas of the extracted (pre-spiked) QC samples with those of the post-spiked standard plasma samples at an equivalent concentration at the same concentrations. The recovery of the IS was measured in the same way at the concentration of 100 ng/mL. The matrix effects were performed by comparing the peak areas obtained from samples where the extracted matrix was spiked with standard solutions to those obtained from the pure reference standards solutions at the same concentration. The stability of puerarin and daidzein in rat plasma was evaluated by analyzing samples at three QC concentrations under different storage conditions: In the auto-sampler at 4°C for 24 h, frozen at −70°C for 4 weeks and three freeze-thaw cycles from −70°C to 20°C, Stability was assessed by comparing the mean concentration of the three stored QC samples with that of the freshly prepared ones.
Twelve male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were randomly divided into two groups. The animals were acclimatized to the facilities for 5 days and then fasted, free access to water for 12h prior to experiment. Six in each group: Animals in the first group were administered an oral dose of 15.0 gm/kg Gegenqinlian Decoction (72.90 mg/kg puerarin and 4.35 mg/kg daidzein) and animals in the second group were administered an oral dose of 7.0 g/kg Radix Puerariae extract (75.25 mg/kg puerarin and 4.27 mg/kg daidzein). Blood samples (300 μL) were obtained from the oculi chorioideae vein before dosing and subsequently at 0.083, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 12.0, 24.0 and 32.0 h following administration, transferred to a heparinized eppendorf tube and centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 10 min. The plasma obtained was frozen at −70°C until analysis. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using Data Acquisition Station (DAS) 2.0 software (Mathematical Pharmacology Professional Committee of China, Shanghai, China).The results were expressed as mean ± SD. The differences in pharmacokinetic parameters among groups were performed by SPSS 19.0 (Statistical Package for the Social Science) using independent samples t-tests. P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant for all the tests. Pharmacokinetic parameters including half-life (t 1/2 ), time of maximum plasma concentration (T max) , area under the curve (AUC 0-t) , peak concentration (C max ) and the elimination rate (CL/F).
| Results and Discussion|| |
Optimization of the mass spectrometric and chromatographic conditions
The determination of puerarin and daidzein was done with MRM detection since higher ion intensities were observed using positive relative mode Electronic Spray Ion (ESI). According to the full-scan ESI (+) mass spectra, the protonated molecule [M + H] + was observed for all of the analytes. By manual optimization using infusion with a syringe pump, the most suitable ion transitions and collision energy with MRM for all target analytes were selected. As shown in [Figure 2], those precursor and product ions were m/z 417.1/296.9 for puerarin, m/z 255.2/199.0 for daidzein and m/z 581.4/273.0 for naringin (IS).
|Figure 2: MRM chromatograms of the two analytes and IS in rat blank plasma (a), spiked with standard solution in blank plasma (b), plasma sample obtained 1 h after oral administration of GQD (c), plasma sample obtained 1 h after oral administration of GG extract (d)|
Click here to view
To achieve symmetric peak shape as well as a short run time for the simultaneous analysis of the three compounds, the chromatographic conditions were optimized through trials and errors. In positive ionization mode, the use of an acidic solvent in mobile phase further enhanced the response of [M + H] + ions It was found that addition of formic acid in the mobile phase provided a higher response and better peak shape. Finally, water (0.1% formic acid)-acetonitrile (0.1% formic acid) as mobile phase by linear gradient elution was employed and low background noise and proper retention time were provided.
Typical chromatograms obtained from a blank, a spiked plasma sample with the analytes and IS and a plasma sample after an oral dose are presented in [Figure 2]. The retention time of puerarin, daidzein and naringin was found to be approximately 2.30, 6.78 and 5.25 min, respectively, There was no significant chromatographic interference around the retention times of the analytes and IS. in drug-free specimens [Figure 2], indicating good resolution of the two isoflavonoids and the IS.
Linearity of calibration curves and LLOQ
The calibration curve of puerarin was y = 0.00365x + 0.00364 (r = 0.9984) and y = 0.00410x + 0.00191 (r = 0.9994) for daidzein, the concentration range of 7.80-1560 ng/mL for puerarin and 6.30-1260 ng/mL for daidzein. All calibration curves showed good linearity. LLOQ was set at 7.80 ng/mL for puerarin and 6.30 ng/mL for daidzein in rat plasma. The LLOQs are appropriate for quantitative detection of analytes in the pharmacokinetic studies.
Precision and accuracy
The intra-day and inter-day precision and accuracy data are shown in [Table 1]. The intra- and inter-day precision were less than 10.8 and 13.6% for puerarin and 8.6 and 12.9% for daidzein. The accuracy ranged from 89.32 to 95.17% for puerarin and from 94.97 to 107.4% for Daidzein. The results revealed good precision and accuracy of this present method.
Recovery and matrix effect
The extraction recoveries of two analytes under the liquid-liquid extraction conditions with ethyl acetate from rat plasma were shown in [Table 2]. The recovery of the QC samples of three concentration levels was in the range of 77.8% and 88.6% for puerarin and was between 76.3% and 86.8% for daidzein. The recovery of the IS was 91.3 ± 5.2% at the concentration used (100 ng/mL). The observed matrix effects ranged from 88.0 to 92.4% for puerarin and from 82.2 to 96.3% for daidzein. It is suggested that the method to be considered reliable and free from the matrix effect.
The stability of the analytes during the sample processing procedures and storing was evaluated by analysis three levels of QC samples. These results were summarized in [Table 3].The results showed that the two analytes remained stable after 24 h in the auto-sampler at 4°C, 4 weeks storage at −70°C and three freeze-thaw cycles.
The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of puerarin and daidzein in rats following oral administration of Gegenqinlian Decoction (GQD) and Radix puerariae extract. The clinical dosage of GQD is 39 g crude drug per day for human, A dose of 3.5 gm GQD (crude drug) per day for rats was corresponding to the recommended dose of 39 g GQD (crude drug) per day in clinic based on body surface area (BSA). A series of doses of 7.5, 15.0 and 30.0 g/kg/day were designed by pilot experiments to rats. As a result, with the dose of 7.5 g/kg/day after administration, the content of daidzein was too low to measure. Meanwile, the reasonable dose 15.0g/kg/day other than 30.0 g/kg/day was finally chosen in this study not only to let the rat dose more equivalent to the clinic human dose but to get the lowest dose to gain the perspective influence to compare differences on pharmacokinetic behavior.
The validated method was successfully applied to the pharmacokinetic study of puerarin and daidzein in rat plasma after oral administration of Gegenqinlian Decoction and Radix Puerariae extract. The mean concentration time curves in the two treatments are shown in [Figure 3] and the pharmacokinetic parameters are summarized in [Table 4]. Both the concentration time curves of puerarin and daidzein were adequately described by a two-compartment open model which were consistent with the literature.  That these two analytes had the similar pharmacokinetic behavior could be tentatively explained based on their similar structures. These two analytes exhibited consistent tendencies in plasma concentration-time profiles and similar T max values after oral administration of either GQD or GG extract.
|Figure 3: Plasma concentration-time profiles of puerarin (a) and daidzein (b) after the oral administration of GQD (15 gm/Kg of rat weight) and GG extract (7 gm/Kg) (n=6)|
Click here to view
|Table 4: The pharmacokinetic data for puerarin and daidzein after oral administration of GQD (15 g/Kg of rat weight) and GG extract (7 g/Kg of rat weight) (mean±SD, n=6) |
Click here to view
In this paper, we found that the T max and t 1/2α values of neither puerarin nor daidzein had significant differences when orally administering Gegenqinlian Decoction and Radix Puerariae extract [Table 4]. However, as shown in [Table 4], some other pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC 0-t , C max and CL/F) were obviously different at almost the same dosages of puerarin or daidzein in the two preparations. The AUC 0-t of puerarin and daidzein after oral administration of Gegenqinlian Decoction (GQD) group was about 1.5, 1.2 fold higher than that of puerarin of oral administration of Radix Puerariae extract (GG) group. After oral administration of GQD, puerarin and daidzein were absorbed with C max being 4.46 ± 0.48, 1.84 ± 0.16 mg/mL respectively and after oral administration of GG group, the absorption of puerarin and daidzein was sharply decreased with the C max being 0.84 ± 0.21, 0.73 ± 0.11 mg/mL for both. Interestingly, however, Compared with the elimination rate (CL/F) of puerarin (19.76 ± 2.75 L/h/kg) and daidzein (7.34 ± 1.07 L/h/kg) after oral administration of GQD group, a remarkably increased CL/F of puerarin and daidzein (26.54 ± 4.06 L/h/kg for puerarin and 8.21 ± 0.55 L/h/kg for daidzein) was observed after oral administration of GG group. Therefore, it can be speculated that the slower elimination rate was a greater contribution to the improvement of the bioavailability of these compounds in GQD. In addition, a remarkable increase in the t 1/2β values of puerarin was observed in the GQD group compared with the GG group, there was no obviously difference in the t 1/2β values of daidzein. According to the pharmacokinetic results mentioned above, it can be inferred that the bioavailability of GQD group is better than the GG group, indicating that the coexisting constituents of other ingredients might accelerate the absorption rate of puerarin and daidzein from the gastrointestinal tract. The difference in the two treatment groups was significant (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01) by unpaired Student's t-test, suggesting that drug interactions occurred in this compound prescription formula, which possibly increased the absorption of puerarin and daidzein and accelerated the elimination of puerarin and daidzein in rats, it needs further clarification. These results were in agreement with those observed in our previous studies , on the effect of the intestinal absorption of puerarin and daidzein in GQD by using averted the rat gut sac model and Caco-2 cell monolayer model which verified that co-administration of other drugs in GQD could significantly elevate the intestinal absorption of puerarin in comparison with that of Radix puerariae alone. The pharmacokinetic parameters of puerarin and daidzein determined in the present study may imply that compound TCM prescriptions may be effective than a single Chinese medicine. Possible compound-compound interactions in GQD should be studied to further elucidate the pharmacokinetic differences between GQD and GG extracts for clinical applications.
| Conclusion|| |
A LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for simultaneous determination of puerarin and daidzein in rat plasma after oral administration of Gegenqinlian Decoction (GQD) and Radix Puerariae (GG) extract. The method was successfully applied to comparative pharmacokinetic study of the two analytes in rat plasma after oral administration of GQD and GG extract. The results of this study showed that the pharmacokinetic parameters of the two analytes of AUC 0-t , C max and CL/F were quite different between GQD and GG extract, the pharmacokinetic parameters showed that puerarin and daidzein from GQD were absorbed more effectively with slower elimination in rat plasma than that from GG extract. Furthermore, these results revealed that as far as the GG extract was concerned, it is very valuable to be used as a clinical directions of GQD. The pharmacokinetic results may be useful for further study of the mechanism of GQD formula.
| Acknowledgments|| |
This study was kindly supported by Shanghai Municipal Education Commission Innovative Research Projects (11ZZ110, 11YZ69, 12YZ199), Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20093107110011), Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (12ZR1431500), The Budget Project of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (2012JW06).
| References|| |
|1.||Yu H. Application of compatibility of traditional Chinese medicine theory. Chin Tradit Herb Drug 2003;4:12-3. |
|2.||Duan FJ. Formulaology. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press; 1995. p. 66. |
|3.||Yu LZ, Wu JY, Luo JB, Chen YR, Lin H. Effects of different compositions of Gegenqinlian Decoction on experimental shigellosis in rabbits. J First Mil Med Unit 2005;25:1132-4. |
|4.||Li X, Wei LB, Luo BD, et al. Effects of Gegen Qin Lian Tang on serum IL-1, IL-2, IL-6 in rat models of large intestine damp-heat syndrome. Med J Chin PAPF 2004;15:586-8. |
|5.||Yu LZ, Wu JY, Luo JB, Huang XG, Shao HX, Lin H. Experimental study on anti-pyretic effect of Gegen Qin Lian decoction and its compounds. China J Chin Mater Med 2004;29:663-6. |
|6.||Pan JQ, Han C, Liu HC, Du JW Li KJExperimental study on hypoglycemic effects of Gegenqinliantang. Chin J New Drugs 2000;9:167-70. |
|7.||Zhang R Hu Y Yuan J Wu D. Effects of Puerariae radix extract on the increasing intestinal permeability in rat with alcohol-induced liver injury. J Ethnopharmacol 2009;126:207-14. |
|8.||Cai RL, Li M, Xie SH, Song Y, Zou ZM, Zhu CY, et al. Antihypertensive effect of total flavone extracts from Puerariae Radix. J Ethnopharmacol 2011;133:177-83. |
|9.||He Y, He W. Extraction, Purification puerarin and daidzein by the method of ultrasonic wave extraction and hydrolization from the root of Pueraria lobata (Wild) Ohwi. Nat Prod Res Dev 2005;17:328-30. |
|10.||Xiong FL, Sun XH, Gan L, Yang XL, Xu HB. Puerarin protects rat pancreatic islets from damage by hydrogen peroxide. Eur J Pharmacol 2006;529:1-7. |
|11.||Chen XF, Dong M, Lei KF,Guan Y,Jin LQ.Antihyperglycemic Effect of Puerarin in experimental diabetes mellitus Rats.Chin Pharm J 2010;45:1242-6. |
|12.||Vedavanam K, Srijayanta S, O'Reilly J, Raman A, Wiseman H. Antioxidant action and potential antidiabetic properties of an isoflavonoid containing soyabean phytochemical extract (SPE). Phytother Res 1999;13:601-8. |
|13.||Choo MK, Park EK, Yoon HK, Kim DH. Antithrombotic and antiallergic Activities of daidzein, a metabolite of puerarin and daidzin produced by human intestinal microflora. Biol Pharm Bull 2002;25:1328-32. |
|14.||Chen G, Zhang JX, Ye JN. Determination of puerarin, daidzein and rutin in Pueraria lobata (Wild.) Ohwi by capillary electrophoresis with electrochemical detection. J Chromatogr A 2001;923:255-62. |
|15.||Zhou HY, Wang JH, Yan FY. RP- HPLC determination of puerarin, daidzin and daidzein in Radix Puerariae Thomsonii of different cultivated species. Chin J Pharm Anal 2006;26:1668-70. |
|16.||Long Y, Yu YZ, Zhu M. Contents determination of puerarin and daidzein in Gegenbao soft capsule by HPLC. Chin Med Herald 2007;4:101-2. |
|17.||Yan B, Wang W, Zhang L, Xing D, Wang D, Du L. Determination of puerarin in rat cortex by high-performance liquid chromatography after intravenous administration of Puerariae flavonoids. Biomed Chromatogr 2006;20:180-4. |
|18.||Zing A, Xing J, Wang C, Song J, Li C, Yang X, et al. Simultaneous analysis and retention behavior of major bioflavonoids in Radix Puerariae lobatae and Radix Puerariae thomsonii by high performance liquid chromatography with cyclodextrins as a mobile phase modifier. Anal Chim Acta 2012;712:145-51. |
|19.||Lau CC, Chan CO, Chau FT, Mok DK. Rapid analysis of Radix puerariae by near-infrared spectroscopy. J Chromatogr A 2009;1216:2130-5. |
|20.||Huang HY, Hsieh YZ. Determination of puerarin, daidzein, paeoniflorin, cinnamic acid glycyrrhizin, ephedrine and 6-gingero1 in Ge-gen-tang by micellar electrokinetic chromatography. Anal Chim Acta 1997;351:49-55. |
|21.||Zhang Q, Myint A, Liu L, Ge X, Cui H. Flow injection-chemiluminescence determination of puerarin in pharmaceutical preparations. J Pharm Anal 2004;36:587-92. |
|22.||Liu LZ, Feng F, Shuang SR. Determination of puerarin and daidzein in Radix Puerariae and Naodesheng tablets by HPCE. Journal of Shanxi Datong University (Natural Science) 2012;28:28-31. |
|23.||Liu YK, Jia XY, Liu X, Zhang ZQ. On-line solid-phase extraction-HPLC-fluorescence detection for simultaneous determination of puerarin and daidzein in human serum. Talanta 2010;82:1212-7. |
|24.||Wang Y, Yao YM, An R, You LS, Wang XH. Simultaneous determination of puerarin, daidzein, baicalin, wogonoside and liquiritin of Gegenqinlian Decoction in rat plasma by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B 2009;877:1820-6. |
|25.||Zhang H, An R, Xu R, Zhang Y, Zhang B, Wang X. Absorption of flavones in Gegenqinlian Decoction and different compatibilities in rat everted gut sac. Chin J Chin Mater Med 2011;36:3332-7. |
|26.||Zhang BS, An R, Wang Y, Wang XH. Cellular Absorption of the active ingredients in different compatibilities of gegenqinlian decoction in human intestinal Caco-2 cells. Zhong Yao Cai 2012;35:1460-3. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]
|This article has been cited by|
||Pharmacokinetics and Safety of DW1029M, a Botanical Drug for the Treatment of Diabetic Nephropathy, Following Single Doses in Healthy Subjects
| ||Yunjeong Kim,Ji-Young Jeon,Eun-Young Kim,Cheol-Hee Lim,Hwan Bong Jang,Min-Gul Kim |
| ||Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development. 2017; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Phase 1 and Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction Study of Metformin, Losartan, and Linagliptin Coadministered With DW1029M in Healthy Volunteers
| ||Seol Ju Moon,Sun-Young Kim,Cheol-Hee Lim,Hwan Bong Jang,Min-Gul Kim,Ji-Young Jeon |
| ||Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development. 2016; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The Applications and Features of Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry in the Analysis of Traditional Chinese Medicine
| ||Bingyao Pang,Ying Zhu,Longqing Lu,Fangbing Gu,Hailong Chen |
| ||Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2016; 2016: 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Dietary Isoflavones as Modulators of Drug Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters: Effect on Prescription Medicines
| ||Isha Taneja,Kanumuri Siva Rama Raju,Kanumuri Siva Rama Wahajuddin |
| ||Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2015; : 00 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Preparative separation of isoflavones in plant extract of Pueraria lobata by high performance counter-current chromatography
| ||Bo Li,Li Li,Anqi Zhao,Binhua Han,Yajun Fan,Chunming Liu,Jianjun Liu |
| ||Anal. Methods. 2015; 7(4): 1321 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|