Home | About PM | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact us |  Login 
Pharmacognosy Magazine
Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
 


 
  Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 31  |  Page : 209-214  

Antimicrobial activity of Marcetia DC species (Melastomataceae) and analysis of its flavonoids by reverse phase-high performance liquid chromatography coupled-diode array detector


1 Laboratory of Phytochemistry, Department of Health, State University of Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil
2 Federal Institute for Education, Science and Technology of Pernambuco - Campus Barreiras, Barreiras, Pernambuco, Brazil
3 Department of Biological Sciences, State University of Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil
4 Institute of Multidisciplinary Health - Campus Anísio Teixeira, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil
5 Microbiology Laboratory of Agribusiness, Department of Biological Sciences, State University of Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil

Date of Submission07-Sep-2011
Date of Decision05-Oct-2011
Date of Web Publication02-Aug-2012

Correspondence Address:
Alexsandro Branco
Laboratory of Phytochemistry, Department of Health, State University of Feira de Santana, Av. Transnordestina, s/nº, Bairro Novo Horizonte, 44.036-900, Feira de Santana, Bahia
Brazil
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-1296.99286

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background: Marcetia genera currently comprises 29 species, with approximately 90% inhabiting Bahia (Brazil), and most are endemic to the highlands of the Chapada Diamantina (Bahia). Among the species, only M. taxifolia (A.St.-Hil.) DC. populates Brazil (state of Roraima to Paranα) and also Venezuela, Colombia, and Guyana. Objective: This work evaluated the antimicrobial activity of hexane, ethyl acetate, and methanol extracts of three species of Marcetia (Marcetia canescens Naud., M. macrophylla Wurdack, and M. taxifolia A.StHil) against several microorganism. In addition, the flavonoids were analyzed in extracts by HPLC-DAD. Materials and methods: The tests were made using Gram-positive (three strains of Staphylococcus aureus) and Gram-negative (two strains of Escherichia coli, a strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and another of Salmonella choleraesius) bacteria resistant and nonresistant to antibiotics and yeasts (two strains of Candida albicans and one of C. parapsilosis) by the disk diffusion method. Solid-phase extraction (SPE) was performed on the above extracts to isolate flavonoids, which were subsequently analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography coupled diode array detector (HPLC-DAD). Results: Results showed that extracts inhibited the Gram-positive bacteria and yeast. The hexane extracts possessed the lowest activity, while the ethyl acetate and methanolic extracts were more active. Conclusion: Marcetia taxifolia was more effective (active against 10 microorganisms studied), and only its methanol extract inhibited Gram-negative bacteria (P. aeruginosa and S. choleraesius). SPE and HPLC-DAD analysis showed that M. canescens and M. macrophylla contain glycosylated flavonoids, while the majority of extracts from M. taxifolia were aglycone flavonoids.

Keywords: Antimicrobial activity, flavonoids, high performance liquid chromatography coupled-diode array detector, Marcetia


How to cite this article:
Leite TC, de Sena AR, Santos Silva TR, dos Santos AK, Uetanabaro AT, Branco A. Antimicrobial activity of Marcetia DC species (Melastomataceae) and analysis of its flavonoids by reverse phase-high performance liquid chromatography coupled-diode array detector. Phcog Mag 2012;8:209-14

How to cite this URL:
Leite TC, de Sena AR, Santos Silva TR, dos Santos AK, Uetanabaro AT, Branco A. Antimicrobial activity of Marcetia DC species (Melastomataceae) and analysis of its flavonoids by reverse phase-high performance liquid chromatography coupled-diode array detector. Phcog Mag [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Jul 19];8:209-14. Available from: http://www.phcog.com/text.asp?2012/8/31/209/99286


   Introduction Top


Brazil has a high biodiversity, comprising approximately 20% of the total species of terrestrial flora, including endemic plants, which have hardly been explored. [1] The Melastomataceae family comprises 166 genera and 4,500 species. [2] In Brazil, this family is the sixth major family between the Angiospermas, with 68 genera and more than 1,300 species. [3],[4] The genus Marcetia is characterized by the combination of scored leaves without glandular tetramer flowers, by isomorphic or subisomorfos stamens, and by connective thickened dorsally, shortly or not prolonged below the teak. [5] Additionally, this genus currently comprises 29 species, with approximately 90% inhabiting Bahia (Brazil), and most are endemic to the highlands of the Chapada Diamantina (Bahia). Among the species, only M. taxifolia (A.St.-Hil.) DC populates Brazil (state of Roraima to Paranα) and also Venezuela, Colombia, and Guyana. [5],[6]

The use of antibiotics has increased considerably in recent years due to developing microorganism resistance. [7] Microorganism resistance has intensified in severe medical cases, for example, in immunocompromised patients, opportunistic infections, post-transplant therapy and chemotherapy treatments, necessitating the search for new compounds. Thus, the secondary metabolism of plants or their synthetic derivatives have become a source of new active compounds against these microorganisms. [8]

Phenolic compounds are widely distributed in the plant kingdom, [9] and they possess biological action, especially antimicrobial [10] and antioxidant activities. [11] Sample preparation is a key procedure in biological and chemical analysis; however, various nonpolar compounds within plant materials affect their preparation. Thus, the method of sample preparation must be simple and effective to obtain the best response. Solid-phase extraction (SPE) is one of the simplest methods for concentrating natural products. [12] Components of interest within a plant extract can be separated from other metabolites by applying the extract to an appropriately chosen solid sorbent, which is prepacked and disposable in cartridges, and selectively eluting the desired components. [13] In the specific case of phenols, the coupling of SPE with reverse phase-high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) allows for crucial analytical characterization of flavonoids in plant extracts. [14],[15] Furthermore, diode array detection (DAD) facilitates characterization of the main flavonoid structures present in a crude extract. [16],[17] Thus, the HPLC-DAD analysis provides information about the flavonoid structure from retention time in a specific solvent phase and from absorption bands. [18] Band A is more significant in the following absorption ranges: 310-350 nm for flavones, 350-385 nm for flavonols, and 300-330 nm for flavanones and dihydroflavonols. [19] In addition, several authors have demonstrated that these techniques are rapid, inexpensive, and efficient. Unknown flavonoids can be identified based on their UV spectra and the correlation with standard compounds isolated from others fonts using other techniques. [20] Additionally, chemotaxonomic data of the family may aid in its identification. [21]

The present study shows the evaluation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of Marcetia extracts, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative resistant and nonresistant bacteria and yeast, using the disk-diffusion method. In addition, after clean-up by SPE, flavonoid analysis was performed on these extracts by HPLC-DAD.


   Material and Methods Top


Plant material

Marcetia canescens Naud., M. macrophylla Wurdack, and M. taxifolia were collected in Morro-do-Chapéu and Rio-de-Contas (Chapada Diamantina, state of Bahia, Brazil). The plants were identified by Dr. Andrea K. A. Santos and Dr. Tβnia R. S. Silva. Voucher specimens were deposited in the Herbarium of the Department of Biology of the State University of Feira de Santana (HUEFS) with the following numbers: T.R.S.Silva 246, A.K.A.Santos 269 and A.K.A.Santos 438, respectively.

Crude extract preparation

The dried aerial part of the plant (125 g of Marcetia canescens, 151 g of M. macrophylla and 44 g of M. taxifolia) was powdered and extracted at room temperature with hexane, ethyl acetate and methanol, successively for 48 hours for each solvent. The solvents were evaporated under reduced pressure to obtain the hexane extract [HE: 2.6 g (yielding 2.1%), 3.8 g (2.5%) and 0.9 g (2.0%), respectively)], ethyl acetate extract [EE: 1.4 g (1.1%), 4.1 g (2.7%) and 0.5 SS]g (1.1%), respectively] and methanol extract [ME: 3.0 g (2.4%), 5.2 g (3.4%) and 1.3 g (3.0%), respectively].

Microorganisms

The strains of bacteria and yeast used were obtained from the Culture Collection of Microorganisms of Bahia (CCMB) at the State University of Feira de Santana, Brazil. We tested four Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli CCMB 261 sensitive to trimethoprim and sulfonamide-resistant, Escherichia coli CCMB 258, Pseudomonas aeruginosa CCMB 268 and Salmonella choleraesius CCMB 281), three Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus CCMB 262 resistant to streptomycin and dihydrostreptomycin, S. aureus CCMB 264 resistant to novobiocin and S. aureus CCMB 263) and three yeast cultures (Candida albicans CCMB 266, C. albicans CCMB 286 resistant to fluconazole and amphotericin B and C. parapsilosis CCMB 288 resistant to fluconazole and amphotericin). Cultures were grown on Müeller-Hinton agar (MHA) at 37 °C for 24 h for bacteria and at 28 °C for 48 h for yeast.

Antimicrobial activity

The antimicrobial activity of extracts was carried out using the agar diffusion method. [22] This test was performed on sterile filter paper disks (6 mm), as recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standard. [23] An aliquot of each extract (100 mg/ml) was sterilized by 0.22 μm membrane filtration (TPP), and the filter paper disks were then impregnated with an aliquot of 5 μl. A suspension with 100 μl of the test microorganism (0.1 ml of 1.5 × 10 8 CFU ml-1 for bacteria and 0.1 ml of 1.5×10 5 CFU ml -1 for yeast) was spread on the surface of the Müeller Hinton Agar solid media (MHA) in Petri dishes (15 ×90 mm). Afterward, the disk impregnated with extracts was placed on the plates inoculated with the test microorganisms. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h for bacteria and 28 °C for 48 h for yeast. After this period, visual readings were performed by observing the presence of a bacterial growth inhibition zone measured in millimeters, with the aid of a millimeter ruler. As a positive control, the disks were impregnated with 5 μl of antimicrobial substance at concentrations of 10 mg/ ml erythromycin for bacteria and 20 mg/ml nystatin for yeast. As a negative control, the disks were impregnated with hexane (5 μl). All tests were performed in triplicate.

Flavonoid analysis

The flavonoid used as a reference was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The calycopterin was previously obtained in our laboratory from Marcetia latifolia Naud. [24] Prior to HPLC-DAD analysis from the Marcetia ethyl acetate and methanol extracts, a purification step was carried out using solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges to concentrate the flavonoid compounds. One milliliter of each extract was passed through a C 18 Sep-pak cartridge (Strata-X, Phenomenex). Flavonoids were adsorbed onto the column and eluted with methanol. The methanol was removed under vacuum, and the flavonoid content was redissolved in Milli-Q water. The flavonoid analyses were made using a reverse-phase HPLC column on a Hitachi equipped with an autoinjector, a photodiode array detector (PAD) and Lachrom software. Spectra data were recorded from to 200 to 400 nm during the entire run. An Elite LiCospher 100 RP 18 (5 μm, 150 × 4 mm) column (Merck) and a 4.6 mm × 2.0 mm guard column were used for flavonoid analysis at 30°C. The mobile phase was composed of solvent (A) H 2 O/H 3 PO 4 0.1% and solvent (B) MeOH. The solvent gradient was composed of A (75-0%) and B (25-100%) for 25 minutes. A flow rate of 1.0 ml/min was used, and 20 μl of each sample was injected. Samples and mobile phases were filtered through a 0.22 μm Millipore filter prior to HPLC injection. Flavonoids were characterized by comparing their retention time and UV-Vis spectral data to that of known standards.


   Results Top


The data for antibacterial and antifungal activities for the crude extracts of Marcetia canescens, M. macrophylla and M. taxifolia are shown in [Table 1] and [Table 2], respectively. The antimicrobial activities assay was performed for the crude extract against three strains of Gram-positive bacteria, four strains of Gram-negative bacteria and three strains of yeast. The SPE procedures were applied to ethyl acetate and methanol extracts to obtain concentrated flavonoids in Marcetia species. The samples of each extract were later analyzed by HPLC-DAD. [Figure 1] shows chromatograms of the samples, and [Figure 2] shows the UV λ max values of peaks eluted in Marcetia samples.
Figure 1: High performance liquid chromatography coupled Chromatogram of Marcetia species. Chromatograms to the left represent the ethyl acetate extraction, and chromatograms to the right represent the methanolic extraction

Click here to view
Figure 2: UV spectra of the peaks shown in the high performance liquid chromatography coupled chromatogram of Marcetia species

Click here to view
Table 1: Antibacterial activity of the crude extracts from Marcetia species using the diffusion methodh

Click here to view
Table 2: Antifungal activity of the crude extracts from Marcetia species using the diffusion methodh

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The extracts that were studied had lower inhibition against yeast, except for the methanolic extract of M. taxifolia that inhibits the microorganisms P. aeruginosa (8.20 mm) and S. choleraesius (12.92 mm). All extracts inhibited the growth of S. aureus that is resistant and nonresistant to antibiotics, but they were inactive against Gram-negative bacteria. Erythromycin, which was used as a positive experimental control against all assayed bacteria strains, produced a zone of inhibition of 14-31 mm [Table 1].

The inhibition zone analysis of the organisms tested suggest that the ethyl acetate extracts and methanol extracts of M. taxifolia were the most active, inhibiting the grown of five and seven microorganisms, respectively. Ethyl acetate extracts of M. canescens and methanol extracts of M. taxifolia yielded the largest inhibition zone diameters, with a 19.85 mm diameter against S. aureus and a 15.5 mm diameter against C. parapsilosis.

After the evaluation and comparison of antimicrobial activity between different extracts of Marcetia species collected in the Brazilian semiarid region, it was notable that a principal class of natural products was responsible for their actions. Furthermore, the large variety of natural products may each possess antimicrobial activity. In the present study, the hexane extracts (apolar) of three Marcetia species showed that the low ranges of antimicrobial properties were different for the more methanol extracts. Gas chromatography analysis of these extracts showed the presence of a majority of hydrocarbonets and a minority of terpenoids, which are common in the Melastomataceae family. [25] On the other hand, polar extracts from species within this family exhibited a wide range of antimicrobial activity with varying strengths against the tested Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and also some fungi. [26],[27],[28],[29] Chemical investigation of the antimicrobial active extract of Melastomataceae cited in literature showed the presence of flavonoid, e.g., Miconia cabucu Hoehne, M. rubiginosa (Bonpl.) DC, M. stenostachya DC, [30] and Tibouchina grandifolia Cogn. [31] These facts suggest that flavonoid is truly active against several microorganisms due to its ability to react with extracellular and soluble proteins and to form complexes with bacterial cell walls, [32] allowing us to investigate the presence of flavonoids in the extracts of Marcetia.

To perform HPLC-DAD analysis, the same patterns of flavonoids were eluted in the same experimental HPLC-DAD conditions: three glycosylated flavonoids (naringin tR 8.5 minutes, hesperidin tR 8.9 minutes and rutin tR 9.2 minutes), one polyhydroxylated flavonoid (quercetin tR 11.9 minutes), and one polymethoxylated flavonoid (tR 15.5 minutes calycopterin). This polymethoxylated flavonoid was isolated from M. latifolia. [24] Thus, three regions of elution were determined in this system: glycosylated (between 8 and 10 minutes), hydroxylated (approximately 12 minutes) and polymethoxylated (14-17 minutes) flavonoids.

Thus, the ethyl acetate extract of M. taxifolia (peaks 9, 10, and 11) primarily contained polymethoxylated flavonoids, while the methanol extracts of M. canescens (peaks 3, 4, and 5) and M. macrophylla (peaks 7 and 8) contained glycosylated flavonoid. The other chromatograms lacked flavonoids. It can be deduced from the UV spectra that flavonoids present in chromatograms were of the flavonol class due the absorption between 342 and 359 nm (band I), characteristic of this flavonoid class.

There was a correlation between the presence of glycosylated flavonoids and good antimicrobial activity from the extracts against S. aureus, except the methanol extract of M. taxifolia did not show glycosylated flavonoid and showed good inhibition against this microorganism.


   Conclusion Top


This is the first study focused on antimicrobial activity and flavonoid profile in the Marcetia species. The hexane, ethyl acetate, and methanolic extracts of the species of Marcetia tested in this work showed some antimicrobial activity. The flavonoids present in the extracts were extracted using SPE followed by HPLC-DAD analysis. This method illustrates a good and rapid technique to analyze flavonoids in Marcetia species. Thus, M. canescens and M. macrophylla were used to derive glycosylated flavonols, while the majority of extracts from M. taxifolia were aglycone flavonols.

 
   References Top

1.Barreto-de-Castro LA. Sustainable use of biodiversity - components of a model project from Brazil. Braz J Med Bio Res 1996;29:687-99.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Renner SS. Phylogeny and classification of the Melastomataceae and Memecylaceae. Nord J Bot 1993;13:519-40  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Baumgratz JF, Bernardo KF, Chiavegatto B, Goldenberg R, Guimarães PJ, Kriebel R, et al. In: Forzza RC, Baumgratz JF, Bicudo CE, Carvalho Jr AA, Costa A, Costa DP, et al. editors. Catalogue of Plants and Fungi of Brazil Vol. 2. Rio de Janeiro: Andrea Jakobsson Estúdio Editorial; 2010. p. 880-1699.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Clausing G, Meyer K, Renner SS. Correlations among fruits and evolution of different fruits within Melastomataceae. Bot J Linn Soc 2000;133:303-26.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Martins AB, Woodgyer EM. A new species of Marcetia (Melastomataceae) from Brazil. Kew Bulletin 2000;55:189-93.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Santos AK, Martins AB, Silva TR. Marcetia candolleana (Melastomeae - Melastomataceae), a new species from Bahia (Brazil). Kew Bulletin 2008;63:315-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Farr BM, Salgado CD, Karchmer TB, Sherertz RJ. Can antibiotic-resistant nosocomial infections be controlled. Lancet Infect Dis 2001;1:38-45.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Seddon J, Bhagani S. Antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of opportunistic infections in HIV/AIDS patients: a critical appraisal. HIV AIDS (Auckl) 2011;3:19-33.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Haslam E. Natural polyphenols (vegetable tannins) as drugs: possible modes of action. J Nat Prod 1996;59:205-15.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Lacombe A, Wu VCH, Tyler S, Edwards K. Antimicrobial action of the American cranberry constituents; phenolic, anthocyanins, and organic acids, against Escherichia coli O157:H7. Int J Food Microbiol 2010;139:102-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Pietta PG. Flavonoids as antioxidants. J Nat Prod 2000;63:1035-42.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Rodriguez I, Llompart MP, Cela R. Solid-phase extraction of phenols. J Chromatogr A 2000;885:291-304.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Hennion MC. Solid-phase extraction: method development, sorbents, and coupling with liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1999;856:3-54.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Klejdus B, Vitamvásová D, Kubán V. Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of isoflavones in plant materials after isolation by solid-phase extraction. J Chromatogr A 1999;839:261-3.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Michalkiewicz A, Biesaga M, Pyrzynska K. Solid-phase extraction procedure for determination of phenolic acids and some flavonols in honey. J Chromatogr A 2008;1187:18-24.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Jockovic N, Andrade PB, Valentão P, Sabovljevic M. HPLC-DAD of phenolics in briophytes Lunularia cruciata, Brachytheciastrum velutinum and Kindbergia praelonga. J Serb Chem Soc 2008;73:1161-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Viera FV, Grayer RJ, Paton AJ. Chemical profiling of Ocimum americanum using external flavonoids. Phytochemistry 2003;63:555-67.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Luo C, Zou X, Li Y, Sun C, Jiang Y, Wu Z. Determination of flavonoids in propolis-rich functional foods by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection. Food Chem 2011;127:314-20.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Robards K, Antolovich M. Analytical chemistry of fruits bioflavonoids - A review. Analyst 1997;122:11R-34R.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Nováková L, Spácil Z, Seifrtová M, Opletal L, Solich P. Rapid qualitative and quantitative ultra high performance liquid chromatography method for simultaneous analysis of twenty nine common phenolic compounds of various structures. Talanta 2010;80:1970-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Hegnauer R. Phytochemistry and plant taxonomy - an essay on the chemotaxonomy of higher plants. Phytochemistry 1986;25:1519-35.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Balakrishnan N, Bhaskar VH, Jayakar B, Sangameswaran B. Antibacterial activity of Mimosa pudica, Aegle marmelos and Sida cordifolia. Phcog Mag 2006;2:198-9.   Back to cited text no. 22
    
23. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. Approved standard M2-A8. 8 th ed. Wayne, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 2003.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Leite TCC. Evaluation of antimicrobial activity and chemical study of the genus Marcetia (Melastomataceae). Biotech. M. Thesis. Feira de Santana, BA: State University of Feira de Santana; 2009.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Crevelin EJ, Turatti IC, Crotti AE, Veneziani RC, Lopes JL, Lopes NP, et al. Identification of biologically active triterpenes and sterols present in hexane extracts from Miconia species using high-resolution gas chromatography. Biomed Chromatogr 2006;20:827-30.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Celloto AC, Nazario DZ, Spessoto MA, Martins CH, Cunha WR. Evaluation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of crude extracts of three Miconia species. Braz J Microbiol 2003;34:339-40.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Wang YC, Hsu HW, Liao WL. Antibacterial activity of Melastoma candidum D. Don. Food Sci Technol 2008;26:01-6.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Ventura CP, Oliveira AB, Braga FC. Antimicrobial activity of Trembleya laniflora, Xyris platystachia and Xyris pterygoblephara. Braz J Pharmacogn 2007;17:17-22.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Hullatti KK, Rai VR. Antimicrobial activity of Memecylon malabaricum leaves. Fitoterapia 2004;75:409-11.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.Rodrigues J, Michelin DC, Rinaldo D, Zocolo GJ, dos Santos LC, Vilegas W, et al. Antimicrobial activity of Miconia species (Melastomataceae). J Med Food 2008;11:120-6.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.Kuster RM, Arnold N, Wessjohann L. Anti-fungal flavonoids from Tibouchina grandifolia. Biochem Syst Ecol 2009;37:63-5.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Cowan MM. Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev 2002;12:564-82.  Back to cited text no. 32
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


This article has been cited by
1 In vitro photoprotective effects of Marcetia taxifolia ethanolic extract and its potential for sunscreen formulations
Sônia C.C. Costa,Cassia B. Detoni,Carla R.C. Branco,Mariana B. Botura,Alexsandro Branco
Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia. 2015; 25(4): 413
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Floral-like destiny induced by a galling Cecidomyiidae on the axillary buds of Marcetia taxifolia (Melastomataceae)
Bruno Garcia Ferreira,Rosy Mary dos Santos Isaias
Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants. 2014; 209(8): 391
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 developmental stem anatomy and tissue redifferentiation induced by a galling lepidoptera on marcetia taxifolia (melastomataceae)
ferreira, b.g. and isaias, r.m.s.
botany. 2013; 91(11): 752-760
[Pubmed]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Material and Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2989    
    Printed164    
    Emailed5    
    PDF Downloaded21    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal